Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
TOPSIS Modification with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Numbers Cover

TOPSIS Modification with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Numbers

Cybernetics and Information Technologies
Volume 16 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2016
References

References

  1. 1. Angelova, V. Investigations in the Area of Soft Computing Targeted State of the Art Report. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 1, pp. 18-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Ashtiani, B., F. Haghighirad, A. Makui, G. Montazer. Extension of Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Based on Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets. - Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 9, 2009, No 2, pp. 457-461.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Behzadia n, М., S. Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, J. Ignatius. A State-of the-Art Survey of TOPSIS Applications. - Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, 2012, Issue 17, pp. 13051-13069.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Celik, E., M. Gul, N. Aydin, A. Taskin Gumus, A. Fuat Guneri. A Comprehensive Review of Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches Based on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. - Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 85, 2015, pp. 329-341.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Chen, C.-T. Extensions of the TOPSISfor Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment. - Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 114, 2000, No 1, pp. 1-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Chen, S.-M., L.-W. Lee. Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Group Decision-Making Based on the Interval Type-2 TOPSIS Method. - Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 37, 2010, No 4, pp. 790-2798.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Chu, T. C., Y. C. Lin. A Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Robot Selection. - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 21, 2003, pp. 284-290.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Dymova, L., P. Sevastjano v, A. Tikhonenko. An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Extension of the TOPSIS Method Using Alpha Cuts. - Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 83, 2015, Issue C, pp. 116-127.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Gartner. Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms. Annual Report, 2016. https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-2XXET8P&ct=160204&st=sb
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Ghazanfari, M., S. Rouhani, M. Jafari. A Fuzzy TOPSIS Model to Calculate the Business Intelligence Competencies of Port Community Systems. - Polish Maritime Research 2(82), Vol. 21, 2014, pp. 86-96.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Ilieva, G. A Fuzzy Approach for Bidding Strategy Selection. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 12, 2012, No 1, pp. 61-69.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Jahanshahloo, G. R., H. F. Lotfi, M. Izadikhah. Extension of the TOPSIS Method for Decision-Making Problems with Fuzzy Data. - Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 181, 2006, No 2, pp. 1544-1551.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Kahraman, C., B. Oztaysi, E. Turanoglu. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. - Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 59, 2014, pp. 48-57.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Mardani, A., A. Jusoh, E. K. Zavadskas. Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques and Applications - Two Decades Review from 1994 to 2014 Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, 2015, Issue 8, pp. 4126-4148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Mendel, J. M., R. I. John. Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple. - IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 14, 2006, No 6, pp. 808-821.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. An Algorithm for Comparison of Fuzzy Sets. - Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 60, 1993, Issue 1, pp. 59-65.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Algorithms. - Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., Vol. 63, 2010, No 7, pp. 979-992.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Models for Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Fuzzy Numbers for Criteria Evaluations. - Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., Vol. 62, 2009, No 10, pp. 1217-1222.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Weighting Functions for the Criteria. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 4, pp. 58-71.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Radeva, I. Multi-Criteria Models for Cluster Design. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 13, 2013, pp. 18-33.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Rezvani, S. Representation of Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers with Shape Function. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, Vol. 8, 2014, No 1, pp. 89-112.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Rouhani, S., M. Ghazanfari, M. Jafari. Evaluation Model of Business Intelligence for Enterprise Systems Using Fuzzy TOPSIS. - Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, 2012, pp. 3764-3771.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Soloukdar, A., A. Parpanci. Comparing Fuzzy AHPand Fuzzy TOPSISfor Evaluation of Business Intelligence Vendors. - Decision Science Letters, Vol. 4, 2015, pp. 137-164.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cait-2016-0020 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702 (formerly 1314-4081)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 60 - 68
Published on: Jun 22, 2016
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Multi-criteria decision making,
TOPSIS,
interval type-2 fuzzy sets,
business intelligence
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Information technology

© 2016 Galina Ilieva, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 16 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Previous article
Next article