Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of the Nonparametric DEA Meta-frontier Approach with Undesirable Outputs in the Case of EU Regions Cover

Application of the Nonparametric DEA Meta-frontier Approach with Undesirable Outputs in the Case of EU Regions

Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. 1. Annoni, P., Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU Regional Competitiveness Index 2013. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
  2. 2. Barnes, A., Revoredo-Giha, C. (2011), “A Metafrontier Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Selected European Agricultures”, paper prepared for presentation at the EAAE 2011 Congress Change and Uncertainty, available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/114807/2/Revoredo-Giha_Cesar_416.pdf (10 July 2016)
  3. 3. Chiu, Ching-Ren et al. (2012), “Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output”, Energy Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 1392–1399.10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.003
  4. 4. Chung, Y. et al. (1997), “Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 229–240.10.1006/jema.1997.0146
  5. 5. European Commission (2013), “Regional Policy Inforegio. Draft EU Regional Competitiveness Index: RCI 2013”, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/cs/information/publications/studies/2013/draft-eu-regional-competitiveness-index-rci-2013 (28 January 2016)
  6. 6. Eurostat (2015) “Data. Regional Statistics by NUTS classification”, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (20 December 2015)
  7. 7. Färe, R. et al. (2006), “Productivity growth and convergence in the European Union”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 25, pp. 111–141.10.1007/s11123-006-7134-x
  8. 8. Färe, R. et al. (2015). “Distance Functions in Primal and Dual Spaces”, in Zhu, J. et al. (Eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis. A Handbook of Models and Methods, Springer, New York, pp. 12–32.
  9. 9. Halkos, G. E. et al. (2015), “Regional sustainability efficiency index in Europe: an additive two-stage DEA approach. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/s12351-015-0170-4
  10. 10. Hanclova, J. (2015), “Comparison of production performance in information and communication sectors in the EU selected countries“, in IDIMT-2015: Information Technology and Society Interaction and Interdependence: 23rd Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks, Sept. 9-11, 2015, Poděbrady, Czech Republic, Trauner, Linz, pp. 111–118.
  11. 11. Macpherson, A.J., Principe, P.P., Smith, E.R. (2010), “A Directional distance function approach to regional environmental-economic assessments”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, pp. 1918–1925.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.012
  12. 12. Mandak, J. (2014), “ICT and technical efficiency of 15 EU countries: A stochastic frontier analysis approach”, in Mathematical Methods in Economics, MME 2014: 32nd international conference: September 10-12, Olomouc, Czech Republic, Palacký University, Olomouc, pp. 602–607.
  13. 13. O’Donell, C.J., Rao, D.S.P., Battese, G.E. (2008), “Metafrontier Frameworks for Study of Firm-level Efficiencies and Technology ratios”, Empirical Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 231–255.10.1007/s00181-007-0119-4
  14. 14. Oh, D. (2010), “A Metafrontier Approach for Measuring an Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth Index”, Energy Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 146–157.10.1016/j.eneco.2009.07.006
  15. 15. Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Reig-Martínez, E., Hernández_Sancho, F. (2005), “Directional Distance Functions and Environmental Regulation”, Energy Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 131–142.10.1016/j.reseneeco.2004.07.001
  16. 16. Rehacek, P. (2011), “Risk management and FMEA”, in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Strategic Management and its Support by Information Systems (SMSIS 2011), 5th - 7th September, Čeladná, Czech Republic, Ostrava, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, pp. 154–158.
  17. 17. Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  18. 18. Song, M. et al. (2012), “Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, pp. 4465–4469.10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.052
  19. 19. Stanickova, M. (2014), “Competitiveness Factors in Regional Growth: the Case of Central and Eastern European Countries”, in Honova, I. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on European Integration 2014, VŠB-TUO, Ostrava, pp. 634–643.
  20. 20. Tran, L.T. et al. (2006), “A generalized distance measure for integrating multiple environmental assessment indicators”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 21. No. 4, pp. 469–476.10.1007/s10980-005-5324-y
  21. 21. World Economic Forum (2013), “The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014”, WEF, Lausanne.
  22. 22. Yuan, P.et al. (2013), “Measuring the environmental efficiency of the Chinese industrial sector: A directional distance function approach”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 58, pp. 936–947.10.1016/j.mcm.2012.10.024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bsrj-2016-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1847-9375 | Journal ISSN: 1847-8344
Language: English
Page range: 65 - 77
Submitted on: Feb 7, 2016
|
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2016
|
Published on: Oct 17, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Jana Hančlová, Lukáš Melecký, published by IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.