Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Differences among Selected EU Countries

Vukic, Nikolina Markota

doi:10.1515/bsrj-2015-0012

Abstract

Background: Greater transparency has become a relevant topic for companies around the world. Information and communication technologies revolution (ICT revolution) has forced companies to become more transparent. With the intention of increasing companies’ transparency, the European Union (hereinafter: the EU) has presented a new Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU which makes Corporate Social Reporting (hereinafter: CSR reporting) mandatory for certain companies.

Objectives: EU Directives should be the same for all Member States; however, some authors have concluded that CSR reporting is different in companies of different sizes, industries or from different countries. The main objective of this paper is to research into differences of CSR reporting among selected EU countries.

Methods/Approach: The Global Reporting Initiative (hereinafter: GRI) has shaped a reporting framework for CSR reporting. In this research the GRI will be used for comparison of CSR reports of different countries.

Results: Results of this research revealed that the difference in CSR reporting is statistically significant among selected EU countries.

Conclusions: As CSR reporting in the EU will become mandatory for certain companies, it will be a challenge for Member States to harmonize their national legislation to a degree which will increase companies’ transparency and at the same time protect local resources and interests of stakeholders.

References

1. Aktas, R., Kayalidere, K., Kargin, M. (2013), “Corporate sustainability reporting and analysis of sustainability reports in Turkey“, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 113-125.10.5539/ijef.v5n3p113
Search in Google Scholar
2. Burnett, R., Skousen, C., Wright, C. (2011), “Eco-effective management: an empirical link between firm value and corporate sustainability“, Accounting and the Public Interest, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-15.10.2308/apin-10075
Search in Google Scholar
3. Commission of the European Communities (2011), “Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility”, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-01-9_en.pdf (15 May 2015)
Search in Google Scholar
4. Cornelissen, J. (2008), Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice, London, Sage.
Search in Google Scholar
5. Elkington, J. (1997), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21 Century Business, Oxford, Capstone Publishing.10.1002/tqem.3310080106
Search in Google Scholar
6. Global Reporting Initiative (2013a), Carrots and Sticks - Sustainability reporting policies worldwide – today’s best practice, tomorrow’s trends, 2013 edition.
Search in Google Scholar
7. Global Reporting Initiative (2013b), “Sustainability Disclosure Database“, available at http://database.globalreporting.org/ (12 March 2015)
Search in Google Scholar
8. Kolk, A. (2010), “Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs“, Journal of World Business, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 367-374.10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.001
Search in Google Scholar
9. KPMG (2013), “The KPMG survey of corporate social responsibility reporting”, available at https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013-exec-summary.pdf (12 March 2015)
Search in Google Scholar
10. Michelon, G., Parbonetti, A. (2010), “The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure“, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 477-509.10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3
Search in Google Scholar
11. Schreck, P. (2013), „Disclosure (CSR Reporting)“,.in Idowu, S. O. et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 801-810, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_145
Search in Google Scholar
12. Spence, C., Gray, R. (2007), Social and Environmental Reporting and the Business Case, London, Certified Accountants Educational Trust.
Search in Google Scholar
13. Tangen, S. (2005), „Analysing the requirements of performance measurement systems”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol.9, No.4, pp. 46-54.10.1108/13683040510634835
Search in Google Scholar

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Differences among Selected EU Countries

Abstract

Paradigm

My account