Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘Access to Justice’ and the Development of the Van Gend En Loos Doctrine: The Role of Courts and of the Individual in EU Law Cover

‘Access to Justice’ and the Development of the Van Gend En Loos Doctrine: The Role of Courts and of the Individual in EU Law

By: Nasiya Daminova  
Open Access
|Mar 2018

References

  1. 1. Arestis, George. “Fundamental rights in the EU: three years after Lisbon, the Luxembourg perspective.” Research Paper in Law No. 2/2013 (2012): 1-13 // http://aei.pitt.edu/43293/.
  2. 2. Arnull, Anthony. “The Principle of Effective Judicial Protection in EU Law: An Unruly Horse?” European Law Review No. 36 (2011): 51–70.
  3. 3. Benvenisti, Eyal, and George Downs. “The Premises, Assumptions, and Implications of Van Gend en Loos: Viewed from the Perspectives of Democracy and Legitimacy of International Institutions.” European Journal of International Law No. 25 (2014): 85–102.10.1093/ejil/cht084
  4. 4. Broberg, Morten. “Judicial Coherence and the Preliminary Reference Procedure: Article 267 TFEU as a Private Party Remedy for ensuring Judicial Coherence in Europe.” Review of European Administrative Law No. 8 (2015): 9–37.10.7590/187479815X14465419060262
  5. 5. Broberg, Morten. Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  6. 6. Garth, Bryant, and Mauro Cappelletti. “Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective.” Buffalo Law Review No. 27 (1978): 181–292.
  7. 7. Halberstam, Daniel. “Of Power and Responsibility: The Political Morality of Federal Systems.” Virginia Law Review No. 90 (2004): 732–834.10.2307/3202399
  8. 8. Kilpatrick, Claire, Tonia Novitz, and Paul Skidmore. The Future of Remedies in Europe. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000.
  9. 9. Klamert, Marcus. The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.001.0001
  10. 10. Lenaerts, Koen, Ignace Maselis, and Kathleen Gutman. EU Procedural law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  11. 11. Mastroianni, Roberto, and Andrea Pezza. “Access of Individuals to the European Court of Justice of the European Union Under the New Text of Article 263, Para 4, TFEU.” Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico communitario No. 5 (2014): 923–948.
  12. 12. Méndez Pinedo, Elvira. “Access to Justice as Hope in the Dark: In Search for a New Concept in European Law.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science No. 1 (2011): 9–19.
  13. 13. Micklitz, Hans. “Social Justice and Access Justice in Private Law.” European University Institute Working Paper LAW No. 2011/02 (2011): 1-32 // http://ssrn.com/abstract=1824225.
  14. 14. Schütze, Robert. From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238583.001.0001
  15. 15. Tuori, Kaarlo. European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.10.1017/CBO9781316091883
  16. 1. Alassini and Others. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2010, Joined Cases C-317/08 to C-320/08.
  17. 2. Aziz Melki and Sélim Abdeli. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2010, Joined Cases C-188/10 and C-189/10.
  18. 3. Beschluss der 3. Kammer des Zweiten Senats. Bundesverfassungsgericht. The Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2014, 2 BvR 1549/07.
  19. 4. Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Ireland. The European Court of Human Rights, 2005, no. 45036/98.
  20. 5. Chalkor v. Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, C-386/10 P.
  21. 6. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 2010, OJ C83/02.
  22. 7. Comet v Produktschap voor Siergewassen. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1976, Case 45/76.
  23. 8. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008, OJ C115.
  24. 9. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008, OJ C115/01.
  25. 10. Council of the European Union and Others v Vereniging Milieudefensie and Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2015, Joined Cases C-401/12 P and C-403/12 P.
  26. 11. Deutsche Energiehandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2010, C-279/09.
  27. 12. Dhahbi v Italy. The European Court of Human Rights, 2014, no. 17120/09.
  28. 13. Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Official Journal of the European Union, 2007, OJ C303/02.
  29. 14. Foto-Frost v Hauptzollamt Lübeck-Ost. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1987, Case 314/85.
  30. 15. Global Starnet Ltd v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Amministrazione Autonoma Monopoli di Stato. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2017, Case C-322/16.
  31. 16. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2015, C-398/13 P.
  32. 17. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, C-583/11 P.
  33. 18. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, Order in T-18/10.
  34. 19. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, T-526/10.
  35. 20. Jégo-Quéré v Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2002, T-177/01.
  36. 21. João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others v Estado Português. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2015, C-160/14.
  37. 22. Juan Carlos Sánchez Morcillo and María del Carmen Abril García v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2014, C-169/14.
  38. 23. Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, C-240/09.
  39. 24. Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1990, C-106/89.
  40. 25. NV Algemene Transporten Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratis der Belastingen. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1963, Case 26/62.
  41. 26. Opinion 2/13, Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2014.
  42. 27. Orizzonte Salute - Studio Infermieristico Associato v Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona San Valentino – Città di Levico Terme and Others. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2015, C-61/14.
  43. 28. Plaumann v Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1963, Case 25/62.
  44. 29. Rewe v Landwirtschaftskammer fuer das Saarland. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1976, Case 33/76.
  45. 30. Schipani and Others v Italy. The European Court of Human Rights, 2015, no. 38369/09.
  46. 31. T & L Sugars Ltd and Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, T-279/11.
  47. 32. Telefónica SA v European Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, C-274/12 P.
  48. 33. Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitiekanslern. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2007, C-432/05.
  49. 34. Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2002, C-50/00 P.
  50. 35. ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, C-300/11.
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 153
Submitted on: Sep 6, 2017
Accepted on: Dec 14, 2017
Published on: Mar 7, 2018
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Nasiya Daminova, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.