The Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law: A Horizontal Perspective

Parchomiuk, Jerzy

doi:10.1515/bjlp-2017-0010

References

1. Achterberg, Norbert. Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 1986.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Battini, Stefano. “Globalisation and Extraterritorial Regulation: An Unexceptional Exception”: 61–80. In: Gordon Anthony, Jean-Bernard Auby, John Morison, and Tom Zwart, eds. Values in Global Administrative Law. Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing, 2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Bauer, Hartmut. Die Bundestreue. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Dogmatik des Bundesstaatsrechts und zur Rechtsverhältnislehre. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Bull, Hans P., and Veith Mehde. Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht mit Verwaltungslehre. Heidelberg, München, Landsberg, Frechen, Hamburg: C.F. Müller, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Burmeister, Joachim. Vertrauensschutz im Prozeβrecht. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 1979.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Cassese, Sabino. Istituzioni di diritto amministrativo. Milano: Giuffré Editore, 2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Castillo Blanco, Fernando. Protección de Confianza en el Derecho Administrativo. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 1998.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Chapus, René. Droit administratif général, Tome 1. Paris: Montchrestien, 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Díez Sastre, Silvia, and Kevin Weyand. “Spanien”: 181–369. In: Jens-Peter Schneider, Hans-Werner Rengeling, Oliver Dörr, and Albrecht Weber, eds. Verwaltungsrecht in Europa. Band 1. England und Wales, Spanien, Niederlande. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Endicott, Thomas. Administrative Law. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press 2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. García de Enterría, Eduardo. “El principio de protección de la confianza legítima como supuesto título justificatiovo de la responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado legislador.” Revista de Administración Pública No. 159 (2002): 173–180.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Gaudemet, Yves. Traité de droit administratif. Tome I. Paris: L.G.D.J., 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Gächter, Thomas. Rechtsmissbrauch im öffentlichen Rechts. Zürich/Basel/Genf: Schulthess, 2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Häfelin, Ulrich, and Georg Müller. Grundriss des Allgemeinen Verwaltungsrechts. Zürich: Schulthess, 1998.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Hufen, Friedhelm. Verwaltungsprozessrecht. 9^th ed. München: C.H. Beck 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Kopp, Ferdinand O., and Ulrich Ramsauer. Verwaltungsverfahrensgezetz. 13^th ed. München: C. H. Beck 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Kaiser, Anna-Bettina. “Bauordnungsrecht”: 208–301. In: Dirk Ehlers, Michael Fehling, and Hermann Pünder, eds. Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, Band 2, Planungs-, Bau- und Straβenrecht, Umweltrecht, Gesundheitsrecht, Medien- und Informationsrecht. 3^th ed. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Knödler, Christoph. Miβbrauch von Rechten, selbstwidersprüchliches Verhalten und Verwirkung im öffentlichen Recht. Herbolzheim: Centaurus Verlag, 2000.10.1007/978-3-658-14541-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Küch, Florian. Vertrauensschutz durch Staatshaftungsrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Lemańska, Joanna. Uzasadnione oczekiwania w perspektywie prawa krajowego i regulacji europejskich. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Lewis, Clive. Judicial Remedies in Public Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Maurer, Hartmut. Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Pagone, Gaetano (Tony). “Estoppel in Public Law: Theory, Fact and Fiction.” University of New South Wales Law Journal Vol. 7, No. 2 (1984): 267–284.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Paul, Joel R. “Comity in International Law.” Harvard International Law Review Vol. 32, No 1 (1991): 1–44.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Sachs, Michael. “§ 53 Hemmung der Verjährung durch Verwaltungakt”; in: Paul Stelkens, Heinz J. Bonk, and Michael Sachs, eds., Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz. Kommentar, 7^th ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Schmidt-Preuβ, Michael. Kollidierende Privatinteressen im Verwaltungsrecht (Das subjektive öffentliche Recht im multipolaren Verwaltungsrechtsverhältniss). Berlin, 1992.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Schmitt, Karl H. Treu und Glauben im Verwaltungsrecht. Berlin: Junker und Dünnhaupt, 1935.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Schønberg, Soeren J. Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law. London: Oxford University Press, 2000.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299479.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Seerden, Rene, and Fritz Stroink. “Administrative law in the Netherlands”: 145–192. In: Rene Seerden and Fritz Stroink, Administrative law of the European Union, its member states and the United States: a comparative analysis. Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Seinfeld, Gil. “Reflections on Comity in the Law of American Federalism.” Notre Dame Law Rev. 90, No. 3 (2015): 1309–1343.10.2139/ssrn.2592495
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Stelkens, Ulrich. “§ 41 Bekanntgabe des Verwaltungsaktes”; in: Paul Stelkens, Heinz J. Bonk, and Michael Sachs, eds., Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz. Kommentar, 7^th ed. (München: C.H. Beck, 2008)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Stern, Klaus. Das Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Band I. München: C.H. Beck, 1984
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Stich, Rudolf. “Die Verwirkung im Verwaltungsrecht.” DVBl (1959): 234–239.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Thomas, Robert. Legitimate Expectations and Proportionality in Administrative Law. Oxford-Portland: Hart Publishing, 2000.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Waline, Jean. Droit administrative. Paris: Dalloz, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. de Wall, Heinrich. Die Anwendbarkeit privatrechtlicher Vorschriften im Verwaltungsrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Wolff, Hans J., Otto Bachof, and Rolf Stober. Verwaltungsrecht I. München: C.H. Beck, 1994.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Zimmermann, Jan, Aksjomaty prawa administracyjnego. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
1. Act of June 30, 2000, on Industrial Property. [2017] Dziennik Ustaw, p. 776.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht). 8 December 1965 (BVerwGE 23, 25).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Federal Administrative Court. 10 August 2000 (NVwZ 2001, 206).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Federal Administrative Court. 20 June 1967 (BVerwGE 27, 215).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Federal Administrative Court. 23 Mai 1975 (BVerwGE 48, 247).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Federal Administrative Court. 25 January 1974 (BVerwGE 44, 294).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Federal Administrative Court. 27 April 2006 (3 C 23.05) // www.bverwg.de.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Federal Administrative Court. 29 Mai 1980 (BVerwGE 60, 208).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht). 26 January 1972 (BVerfGE 32, 305).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Good Administration. Adopted on 20 June 2007 // rm.coe.int/16807096b9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Supreme Administrative Court (Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny). 22 September 1983 (SA/Wr 367/83, “Orzecznictwo Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego – ONSA” 1983/2/75).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Supreme Administrative Court. 13 July 2004 (GSK 246/04) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Supreme Administrative Court. 14 December 1993 (SA/Po 280/93, “Monitor Podatkowy” 1994/10, p. 315).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Supreme Administrative Court. 15 December 1987 (I SA 177/87, ONSA 1987/2/88).10.1007/BF02980527
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Supreme Administrative Court. 15 December 1998 (I SA 649/98, LEX no 45696).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Supreme Administrative Court. 17 July 2003 (II SA 1165/02) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Supreme Administrative Court. 18 Mai 2011 (I OSK 124/11) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Supreme Administrative Court. 20 March 2003 (II SA/Po 1053/01) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Supreme Administrative Court. 20 November 2003 (IV SA 4138/01) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Supreme Administrative Court. 25 September 2009 (I OSK 1403/08) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Supreme Administrative Court. 29 Mai 2012 r. (II GSK 519/11) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Supreme Administrative Court. 5 March 2008 (II OSK 113/07) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Supreme Administrative Court. 9 July 1998 (I SA 2224/97, Legal Information System LEX no 44515).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Supreme Administrative Court. 9 November 1999 (I SA/Wr 1495/97) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour. Resolution of the European Parliament of 6 September 2001; Decision on Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, [2011] OJ C 285/3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz (VwVfG, Administrative Procedure Act) of May 25, 1976. [2003] Bundesgesetzblatt I, p. 102.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Woivodship Administrative Court (Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny) of Gliwice. 13 October 2004 (II SA/Ka 2188/02) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Woivodship Administrative Court of Lodz. 16 October 2014 (III SA/Łd 692/14) //orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Woivodship Administrative Court of Lublin. 14 February 2013 (III SA/Lu 801/12) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Woivodship Administrative Court of Wrocław. 28 April 2004 (I SA/Wr 709/03) // orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law: A Horizontal Perspective

References

Paradigm

My account