Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Factors that Influence Parole Boards’ and Judges’ Decisions on Parole Application in Lithuania Cover

Factors that Influence Parole Boards’ and Judges’ Decisions on Parole Application in Lithuania

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. 1. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative research in psychology 3 (2) (2006): 77−101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  2. 2. Danziger, Shai, Jonathan Levav, and Liora Avnam-Pesso. “Extraneous factors in judicial decisions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (17) (April 2011): 6889-6892 // DOI:10.1073/pnas.1018033108.10.1073/pnas.1018033108
  3. 3. Englich, Birte, Thomas Mussweiler, and Fritz Strack. “The last word in court − a hidden disadvantage for the defense.” Law and Human Behavior 29 (6) (2005): 705−722 // DOI:10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7.10.1007/s10979-005-8380-7
  4. 4. George, Tracy E., and Lee Epstein. “On the nature of Supreme Court decision making.” American Political Science Review 86 (2) (1992): 323–337.10.2307/1964223
  5. 5. Gobeil, Renée, and Ralph C. Serin. “Preliminary evidence of adaptive decision making techniques used by parole board members.” International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 8.2 (September 2009): 97–104 // DOI: 10.1080/14999010903199258.10.1080/14999010903199258
  6. 6. Huebner, Beth M., and Timothy S. Bynum. “An analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders: A focal concerns perspective.” Criminology 44(4) (2006): 961–991.10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00069.x
  7. 7. Malouff, John, and Nicola S. Schutte. “Shaping juror attitudes: Effects of requesting different damage amounts in personal injury trials.” The Journal of Social Psychology 129 (4) (1989): 491−497.10.1080/00224545.1989.9712067
  8. 8. Morgan, Kathryn D., and Brent Smith. “The impact of race on parole decision-making.” Justice Quarterly 25 (2) (2008): 411–435.10.1080/07418820802024986
  9. 9. Mussweiler, Thomas. “Sentencing Under Uncertainty: Anchoring Effects in the Courtroom.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31 (7) (2001): 1535–1551.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02687.x
  10. 10. Proctor, John L. “The ‘new parole’: An analysis of Parole board decision making as a function of eligibility.” Journal of Crime & Justice 22 (2) (1999): 193–217.10.1080/0735648X.1999.9721100
  11. 11. Report of the Supervision Unit of the Prison Department under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania on Parole Process and Parole Boards’ and Courts’s Motives of Parole Declination in Year 2015. March 14th, 2016, no. LV-948.
  12. 12. Sakalauskas, Gintautas. “Kalinimo sąlygos ir kalinių resocializacijos prielaidos” (Prison conditions and premises of prisoners’ resocialization). Teisės problemos 2 (2015): 5–53.
  13. 13. Sakalauskas, Gintautas. “Lygtinis paleidimas iš įkalinimo įstaigų įsigaliojus Probacijos įstatymui: teorija ir praktika” (Parole application after the enactment of Probation act: theory and practice). Teisės problemos 4 (82) (2013): 5–39.
  14. 14. Sakalauskas, Gintautas. “Nuteistųjų laisvės atėmimo bausme užimtumas: padėtis ir galimybės” (Employment of imprisoned persons: current situation and opportunities). Teisės e-aktualijos 2 (8) (2015): 4–20.
  15. 15. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgement under uncertainity: Heuristics and biases.” Science 185 (4157) (1974): 1124−1131.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  16. 16. Vosyliūtė, Andželika. “Lygtinio paleidimo iš pataisos įstaigų taikymo teismų praktikoje probleminiai aspektai” (Problematic aspects of parole application in court practice): 95–115. In: Gintaras Švedas, ed. Bausmių vykdymo sistemos teisinis reguliavimas ir perspektyvos Lietuvos Respublikoje (Legal regulation and perspectives of penal system in Lithuania). Vilnius: Prison Department under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania, 2010.
  17. 1. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 37-1341.
  18. 2. Law of Changes of the 11, 17, 18, 21, 25, 30 and 31 Articles of Probation Act of the Republic of Lithuania. Register of Legal Acts, 2015, no. 11079.
  19. 3. Law on Changes of the 18, 19, 66, 90, 91, 126, 138, 140, 152, 154, 157, 158, 159, 164, 176 Articles and invalidation of the 127, 160, 161, 162, 163, 179 Articles of Penal Enforcement Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2012, no. 4-110.
  20. 4. Law on Changes of the Penal Enforcement Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Register of Legal Acts, 2015, no. 11069.
  21. 5. Law on Courts of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1994, no. 46-851.
  22. 6. Order of Minister of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania No 1R-154 on Confirmation of Parole Boards Rules. Official Gazette, 2012, no. 65-3314.
  23. 7. Order of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania on the Approval of the Form of Social Research Report and Methodical Recommendations for the Preparation of Social Research Report. Official Gazette, 2012, no. 68-3500.
  24. 8. Penal Enforcement Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 73–3084.
  25. 9. Probation Act of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2012, no. 4-108.
Language: English
Page range: 230 - 259
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2017
|
Accepted on: Jun 29, 2017
|
Published on: Oct 25, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Ilona Michailovič, Liubovė Jarutienė, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.