Conditions and Circumstances which Lead to Application to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Adoption of a Preliminary Ruling

Albertas Milinis; Kristina Pranevičienė

doi:10.1515/bjlp-2016-0015

References

1. Carubba, Clifford J., and Murrah Lacey. “Legal Integration and Use of the Preliminary Ruling Process in the European Union.” International Organization Vol. 59, No. 2 (Spring, 2005): 399–418.10.1017/S0020818305050137
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Claes, Monica. “The Validity and Primacy of EU Law and the ‘Cooperative Relationship’ between National Constitutional Courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 1 (2016): 151–170.10.1177/1023263X1602300109
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Craig, Paul, and Gráinne de Búrca. EU law: text, cases, and materials. 5^th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Derlén, Mattias. Multilingual Interpretation of European Union Law. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Kokott, Juliane. “European criminal law before and after the Treaty of Lisbon”: 645–668. In: Law in the Changing Europe. Mykolas Romeris University, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Kūris, Egidijus. “Europos Sąjungos teisė Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucinio Teismo jurisprudencijoje”: 669–707. In: Law in the Changing Europe. Mykolas Romeris University, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Kūris, Pranas. “Prejudicinio sprendimo procedūra Europos Bendrijų Teisingumo Teisme.” Jurisprudencija, Mokslo darbai Vol. 6 (84) (2006): 7–15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Limantė, Agnė. “Prejudicinio sprendimo procedūros kaip alternatyvos privačių subjektų teikiamiems ieškiniams dėl ES teisės akto panaikinimo trūkumai.” Mokslo darbai. Teisė Vol. 79 (2001): 48–64.10.15388/Teise.2011.0.170
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Norkus, Rimvydas, Deimilė Prapiestytė, and Virgilijus Valančius. Procesas Europos Bendrijų Teisingumo Teisme: preliminarus nutarimas. Vilnius: Teisinės informacijos centras, 2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Prapiestytė, Deimilė. “Cooperation between the Lithuanian Courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union”: 643–672. In: Lithuanian Legal System under the Influence of European Union Law. Faculty of Law. Vilnius University, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Sciarra, Silvana, and Giuseppe Nicastro. “Preliminary References from the Italian Constitutional Court.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law Vol. 1 (2016): 195–203.10.1177/1023263X1602300112
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Tamavičiūtė, Vitalija. Prejudicinis sprendimas dėl Europos Sąjungos teisės akto galiojimo. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius, Mykolas Romeris University, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Timmermans, Christiaan. “What has made European Law so important?”: 829–837. In: Law in the Changing Europe. Mykolas Romeris University, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Tizzano, A. “Ancora sui rapporti tra Corti europee: principi comunitari e c. d. controlimiti costituzionali.” Il Diritto dell‘Unione Europea 3/2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Vėgėlė, Ignas. “Nacionalinių teismų teisė ir pareiga kreiptis į Europos Bendrijų Teisingumo Teismą.” Jurisprudencija, Mokslo darbai Vol. 7 (97) (2007): 39–45.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
1. Allianz SpA, Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA v West Tankers Inc. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2009:69, 2009, no. C-185/07.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Baltlanta UAB v Lietuvos valstybė. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2134, 2014, no. C-410/13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Birutė Šiba v Arūnas Devėnas. ECLI:EU:C:2015:14, 2015, no. C-537/13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Bob-Dogi. Opinion of Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2016:131, 2016, no. C-214/15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. C. Broekmeulen v Huisarts Registratie Commissie. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1981:218, 1981, no. 246/80.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. CILFIT v. Ministero della Sanitá. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1982:335, 1982, no. 283/81.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Da Costa en Schaake et. al. v. Nederlandse Belastingadministratie. Opinion of the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1963:2, 1963, no. C-28/62.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Da Costa en Schaake et. al. v. Nederlandse Belastingadministratie. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1963:6, 1963, no. C-28/62.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of May 8, 2007. Case no.47/04. Official Gazette, 2008, no. 140-5569.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH v. Council and Commission. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2000:321, 2000, no. C-237/98 P.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Edgar Babanov. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2008:407, 2008, no.C-207/08.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Edgar Babanov. Order of the Criminal Division of Panevėžys Regional Court, 2008, no. 1A-114-145/2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Ergo Insurance SE v If P&C Insurance AS and Gjensidige Baltic AAS v PZU Lietuva UAB DK. ECLI:EU:C:2016:40, 2016, joined Cases no. C-359/14 and no. C-475/14).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. G. Vaassen-Göbbels v. Bestuur van Beambtenfonds voor het Mijnbedrijf. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1966:39, 1966, no. 61-65.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Gauweiler. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2015:400, 2015, no. C-62/14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Gazprom OAO v Republic of Lithuania. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2015:316, 2015, no. C-536/13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Gazprom OAO v Republic of Lithuania. Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2414, 2014, no. C-536/13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Gazprom v Republic of Lithuania. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 23 October 2015, case no. 3K-7-458-701/2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Gjensidige Baltic v PZU Lietuva. Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, 17 October 2014, Case no. 3K-3-415/2014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Gregory Paul Turner v Felix Fareed Ismail Grovit, Harada Ltd and Changepoint SA. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, C-159/02, ECLI:EU:C:2004:228, 2004, C-159/02.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Indėlių ir investicijų draudimas VĮ, Virgilijus Vidutis Nemaniūnas v Vitoldas Guliavičius, SNORAS AB. ECLI:EU:C:2015:418, 2015, C-671/13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Kleinwort Benson. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1995:85, 1995, no.C-346/93.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Lanigan. Opinion of Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2015:509, 2015, no. C-237/15 PPU.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Law on Courts of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 1994, no. 46-851; 2003, no. 39-1765.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v Vilniaus teritorinė muitinė and Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2012:496, 2012, no. C-250/11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Nidera Handelscompagnie BV v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2010:627, 2010, no. C-385/09.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri v Regione autonoma della Sardegna. Opinion of advocate general of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2009:420, 2009, no. C-169/08.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Regina Greis Unterweger. Order of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1986:106, 1986, no. 318/85.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, lodged on December 18, 2015. Case no. C-688/15.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Lithuania, lodged on 25 February 2016, case no. C-109/16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of March 14, 2006. Case no. 17/02-24/02-06/03-22/04. Official Gazette, 2006, no. 30-1050.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of December 21, 2006. Case no. 30/03. Official Gazette, 2006, no. 141-5430.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Stefano Melloni. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2013:107, 2013, no. C-399/11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Stefano Melloni. Spanish Constitutional Court judgment of 13 February 2014, no. 26/2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Synetairismos Farmakopoion Aitolias & Akarnanias (Syfait) and Others v GlaxoSmithKline plc and GlaxoSmithKline AEVE. Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2005:333, 2005, no. C-53/03.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Treaty on the European Union. OJ, C 326, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. OJ, C 326, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. Council. Opinion of advocate general of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2002:197, 2002, no. C-50/00 P.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
39. Zoran Spasic. View of Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2014:739, 2014, no. C-129/14 PPU.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Conditions and Circumstances which Lead to Application to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Adoption of a Preliminary Ruling

References

Paradigm

My account