Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Critical Look at the Subjective and Objective Purposes of Contract in Aharon Barak’s Theory of Interpretation Cover

A Critical Look at the Subjective and Objective Purposes of Contract in Aharon Barak’s Theory of Interpretation

Open Access
|Mar 2017

References

  1. 1. Barak, Aharon. Purposive Interpretation in Law. Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2005.10.1515/9781400841264
  2. 2. Beale, Hugh, Hein Kötz, Arthur Hartkamp, and Denis Tallon, eds. Cases, Materials and Text on Contract Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010.
  3. 3. Danet, Brenda. “Language in the Legal Process.” Law and Society 14(3) (1980): 445–550.10.2307/3053192
  4. 4. Dannemann, Gerhard, and Stefan Vogenauer. The Common European Sales Law in Context. Oxford: OUP, 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678907.001.0001
  5. 5. Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. London: Fontana Press, 1986.
  6. 6. Fish, Stanley. “Intention Is All There Is: A Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak’s Purposive Interpretation in Law.” Cardozo Law Review 29(3) (2008): 1109–1146.
  7. 7. Hasanbegović, Jasminka. “Pravne izreke Valtazara Bogišića skraja OIZ = Katalog narodnjačkih opštih pravnih toposa?” (Legal Sayings of Valtazar Bogišić from the Last Section of the General Property Code of Montenegro = A Catalogue of Folk Legal Topoi?): 329–379. In: Luka Breneselović, ed. Spomenica Valtazara Bogišića o stogodišnjici njegove smrti (In Memoriam of Valtazar Bogišić on the Centenary Anniversary of His Death). Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2011.
  8. 8. Henket, Maarten. “Contracts, Promises and Meaning: The Question of Intent.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 5 (1989): 129–148.10.1007/BF02053530
  9. 9. MacCormick, Neil. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: OUP, 1994.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198763840.001.0001
  10. 10. Marella, Maria Rosaria. “The Old and the New Limits to Freedom of Contract in Europe.” European Review of Contract Law 2 (2006): 257–274.10.1515/ERCL.2006.019
  11. 11. Mitchell, Catherine. Interpretation of Contracts. London & New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.
  12. 12. Rott, Hans. “Words in Contexts: Fregean Elucidations.” Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (2000): 621–641.10.1023/A:1005666826560
  13. 13. Scalia, Antonin, Bryan A. Garner. Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. St. Paul MN: Thompson–West, 2012.
  14. 14. Schwartz, Alan, and Robert E. Scott. “Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law.” Yale Law Journal 113 (2003): 541–619.10.2307/3657531
  15. 15. Schwartz, Alan. “Contract Theory and Theories of Contract Regulation.” Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 313 (2000): 101–110.10.3406/rei.2000.1040
  16. 16. Slijepčević, Ratomir. “Tumačenje ugovora” (Interpretation of contracts): 321–332. In: Enciklopedija imovinskog prava i prava udruženog rada (Encyclopaedia of Patrimonial Law). Belgrade: Službeni list, 1978.
  17. 17. Stojanović, Dragoljub. “Član 99. Primena odredaba i tumačenje spornih odredaba” (Article 99. Implementation of Terms and Interpretation of Disputed Term”): 203–210. In: Slobodan Perović, ed. Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima (Commentary of the Code of Obligations). Belgrade: Savremena administracija, 1995.
  18. 18. Villa, Vittorio. “A Pragmatically Oriented Theory of Legal Interpretation.” Revus 12 (2010): 89–120.10.4000/revus.146
  19. 19. Wendel, W. Bradley. “The Craft of Legal Interpretation”: 153–178. In: Yasutomo Morigiwa, Michael Stolleis, and Jean-Louis Halpérin, eds. Interpretation of Law in the Age of Enlightenment. Heidelberg & London & New York: Springer 2011.10.1007/978-94-007-1506-6_9
  20. 20. Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: OUP 1996.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
  21. 1. Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. Official Journal of the European Communities, 1993, no. L 95.
  22. 2. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) of 2009: 131–543. In: Christian von Bar, Eric Clive and Hans Schulte-Nölke, eds. Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). Munich: Sellier, 2009.
  23. 3. French Civil Code (Code Civil) of 1804 // www.legifrance.gouv.fr.
  24. 4. General Property Code of Montenegro of 1888 [no longer in force]. Cetinje: Obod, 1980 [reprint from the original].
  25. 5. German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch) of 1901 // www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb.
  26. 6. Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) of 1998 and 2002 // http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.principles.parts.1.to.3.2002.
  27. 7. Serbian Code of Obligations of 1978. Official Gazette of SFRY, no. 29/1978, 39/1985, 45/1989 and 57/1989, Official Gazette of FRY, no. 31/1993 and Official Gazette of SME no. 1/2003.
  28. 8. UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) of 1980 // http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/sales/cisg/V1056997-CISG-e-book.pdf.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 22
Submitted on: Oct 3, 2016
|
Accepted on: Dec 2, 2016
|
Published on: Mar 4, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Marija Karanikić Mirić, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.