Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Age of Consent and the Reduction of the age of Consent in Church and Civil Marriages and their Interaction

Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. 1. Alpa, Guido, and Vincenzo Zeno-Zencovich. Italian Private Law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.10.4324/9780203945056
  2. 2. Beguerie, Philippe, and Claude Ducheseau. Kaip suprasti santuokinius sakramentus (How to Understand the Sacraments). Kaunas: Lietuvos katechetikos centras, 1998.
  3. 3. Brilius, Vytautas. “Sakramentinės Santuokos Pripažinimo Problemos Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinėje Teisėje” (The Recognition Problems of Sacramental Marriage in Civil Law of Lithuanian Republic). Soter 38 (2003): 47–59.10.7220/2335-8785.10(38).4
  4. 4. Collins, Randall, and Scott L. Coltrane. Sociology of Marriage and Family: Sex, Love and Property. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1991.
  5. 5. Doe, Norman. Law and Religion in Europe A comparative introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604005.003.0001
  6. 6. Hamilton, Carolyn, and Alison Perry. Family Law in Europe. London: Butterworths, 1995.
  7. 7. Kudinavičiūtė-Michailovienė, Inga. “Santuokinis Amžius – Santuokos Sudarymo Sąlyga” (The Age of Consent – the Request of Valid Conjugality). Jurisprudencija 55 (47) (2004): 78–89.
  8. 8. Kudinavičiūtė-Michailovienė, Inga. Santuokos sąlygos ir jų vykdymas (Conditions of marriage and their implementation). Vilnius: Justitia, 2006.
  9. 9. Meilius, Kazys. “Bažnytinė santuoka civilinių ir bažnytinių teismų praktikoje” (The marriage contracted in the Church, Civil law and the practice of courts). Soter 11 (39) (2003): 43–54.10.7220/2335-8785.11(39).3
  10. 10. Meilius, Kazys, ir Gediminas Sagatys. “Bažnyčios (Konfesijų) Nustatyta Tvarka Sudarytų Santuokų Kelias į Pripažinimą” (Way of Marriages to Acknowledgement Formed in Church (Confessions) Established Manner). Jurisprudencija 28 (2002): 128–136.
  11. 11. Mikelėnas, Valentinas, Šarūnas Keserauskas, and Zita Smirnovienė. LR Civilinio kodekso komentaras. Trečioji knyga. Šeimos teisė (Commentary on the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Third book. Family law). Vilnius: Justitia, 2002.
  12. 12. Mikelėnas, Valentinas. Šeimos teisė (Family Law). Vilnius: Justicia, 2009.
  13. 13. Murphy, John. International Dimensions in Family Law. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.
  14. 14. Nekrošius, Vytautas. Europos Sąjungos Civilinio Proceso Teisė (European Union Civil Procedure Law). Vilnius: Justitia, 2009.
  15. 15. No author named. “At what age is it possible to get married?” (January 2016) // http://www.tallinn.ee/eng/Contraction-of-marriage#age.
  16. 16. No author named. “Child marriage: 39 000 every day” (November 2015) // http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2013/child_marriage_20130307/en/.
  17. 17. No author named. International Conference on State and Religious Communities Relationships: State and Religious Communities Relationships in Austria. Vilnius: Lithuanian Ministry of Justice, 2000.
  18. 18. No author named. “Marriage” (January 2016) // http://www.infopankki.fi/en/living-in-finland/family/marriage.
  19. 19. No author named. “Spain moves to raise minimum marriage age to 16.” theguardian.com (November 2015) // http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/28/spain-marriage-age-16-legislation-senate.
  20. 20. No author named. “World minimum marriage age chart.” independent.co.uk (January 2016) // http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/the-lowest-age-you-can-legally-get-married-around-the-world-10415517.html.
  21. 21. North, Peter, and James Fawcett. Private International Law. London: Butterworths, 1987.
  22. 22. Rogers, Sarah. “What is International Marriage?” (April 2013) // http://www.ehow.com/facts_6722709_international-marriage_html#ixzz1JgeOnd6p.
  23. 23. Stockard, Janice E. Marriage in Culture: Practice and Meaning across Diverse Societies. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers, 2002.
  24. 24. UNICEF. “Child marriage” (January 2016) // http://www.unicef.org/azerbaijan/protection_10022.html.
  25. 25. Wardle, Lynn D., and Laurence C. Nolan. Fundamental Principles of Family Law. Praeger: David Orgon Coolidge Eds., 2002.
  26. 26. Wardle, Lynn D. International Marriage Recognition: A World Dilemma, in Families across Frontiers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff publishers, 1996.
  27. 27. Wardle, Lynn D. “Marriage and Religious Liberty: Comparative Law Problems and Conflict of Laws Solutions.” Journal of Law and Family Studies 12 (2) (2010): 315–364.
  28. 1. Agreement between the Holy See and the Italian Republic. Modifications to the Lateran Concordat. February 18, 1984.
  29. 2. Austrian Marriage Act. 1938, BGBl. I, no. 15/2013.
  30. 3. A.Z. v V.B. Supreme Court of Lithuania, 2008, no. 3K-3-148/2008.
  31. 4. Belgian Civil Code. L 19-01-1990, Art. 8, 03-21-1804.
  32. 5. Brook v Brook. 1861, no. 9 HLC 193.
  33. 6. Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2000, no. 74-2262.
  34. 7. Code of Canon Law. Canon Law Society of America, 1999.
  35. 8. Danish Marriage Act. 1969, no. 256.
  36. 9. Finish Marriage Act. 234/1929; amendments up to 1226/2001 included.
  37. 10. French Civil Code. 2006, no. 2006-399.
  38. 11. Gaudium et spes. Pastoral Constitution//Resolutions of the 2nd Vatican Council. Promulgated by His Holiness, Pope Paul VI on December 7. Vatican: The Coniliar And Post Conciliar Documents by Costello, 1965.
  39. 12. German Civil Code. Last amended by Article 4 para. 5 of the Act of 10-01-2013 (Federal Law Gazette I page 3719), 01-02-2002.
  40. 13. G.K. v G.S. Supreme Court of Lithuania, 2007, no. 3K-7-6/2007.
  41. 14. In Re May’s estate. Court of Appeals of New York, 1953, no. 305 N.Y. 486, 114 N.E.2d 4.
  42. 15. Italian Civil Code. 03-16-1942, no. 262.10.7326/0003-4819-16-2-262
  43. 16. Kuklycz v Kuklycz. 1972, no. VR 50.10.25291/VR/1972-VR-50
  44. 17. Latvian Civil Code. Ziņotājs, 1993, no. 22; Valdības Vēstnesis, 1937, no. 41.
  45. 18. Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinio Kodekso, 3.14 Straipsnio Pakeitimo Įstatymas (Amendment Law of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 2000, no. 74-2262.
  46. 19. Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinio Kodekso 3.14 Straipsnio Pakeitimo, Įstatymo Projekto, Aiškinamasis Raštas (Explanatory note of the amendment of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). 2005-02-08, no. XP-246.
  47. 20. Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinio Kodekso 3.14 Straipsnio Pakeitimo, Įstatymo Projekto, Aiškinamasis Raštas (Explanatory note of the amendment of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). 2009-07-23, no. XIP-944.
  48. 21. Lietuvos Respublikos ir Šventojo Sosto Sutartis “Dėl Santykių tarp Katalikų Bažnyčios ir Valstybės Teisinių Aspektų” (Agreement between the Holy See and the Republic of Lithuania concerning juridical aspects of the relations between the Catholic Church and the State). Official Gazette, 2000, no. 67–2022.
  49. 22. Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucija (Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 1992, no. 33-1014.
  50. 23. Lietuvos Respublikos Religinių Bendruomenių ir Bendrijų Įstatymas (Law on Religious Communities of the Republic of Lithuania). Official Gazette, 1995, no. 89-1985.
  51. 24. Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo Kanceliarijos Teisės Departamento Išvada Dėl Lietuvos Respublikos Civilinio Kodekso 3.14 Straipsnio Pakeitimo Įstatymo Projekto (Conclusion of the Lithuanian Seimas Law Department on the amendment Project Law of the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania). 2005-02-10, no. XP – 246.
  52. 25. Lietuvos Vyskupų Konferencijos nutarimas dėl pasirengimo santuokos sakramentui programos (Decision of Lithuanian Bishop Conference regarding program for preparation for matrimonial sacrament). Bažnyčios žinios, 1996, no. 22.
  53. 26. M. Č. v G. P. Supreme Court of Lithuania, 2006, no. 3K-7-20/2006.
  54. 27. M. K. and A. S. v Civil Registry. Court of Appeal of Lithuania, 2002, no. 2A-1608.
  55. 28. Ogden v. Ogden. 1908, P 46.
  56. 29. Ollemnis Conventio Inter Apostolicam Sedem Et Poloniae Rem Publicam (Concordat between the Holy See and the Republic of Polad). July 28, 1993.
  57. 30. Reid v Reid. 1911, no. 72 Misc. 214, 129 N.Y.10.1016/S0372-5545(17)66906-2
  58. 31. R.Ž. v Pravieniškių 1-mieji pataisos namai. Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 2008, no. A-525-219-08.
  59. 32. Savenis v Savenis. 1950, no. SASR 309.
  60. 33. Simonin v Mallac. 1860, no. 2 Sw & Tr 67.10.1038/scientificamerican01281860-67a
  61. 34. Spanish Civil Code. Approved 24-07-1889, last amended by Law No. 20/2011 of 21-07-2007.
  62. 35. The Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 28 September 2011 On The Compliance Of The Provisions Of The State Family Policy Concept As Approved By Resolution Of The Seimas Of The Republic Of Lithuania No. X-1569 “On The Approval Of The State Family Policy Concept” Of 3 June 2008 With The Constitution Of The Republic Of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2011, no. 118-5564.
  63. 36. Valstybė v J. L., I. K. and P. B. Court of Appeal of Lithuania, 2015, no. 1A-127-518.
  64. 37. Wolfenden v Wolfenden. 1946, no. P 61.
Language: English
Page range: 183 - 213
Submitted on: May 31, 2016
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2016
Published on: Oct 17, 2016
Published by: Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Foreign Language
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2016 Jurgita Grigienė, Paulius Čerka, Dalia Perkumienė, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Foreign Language
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.