Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Copyright and Free Speech: The Human Rights Perspective Cover

Copyright and Free Speech: The Human Rights Perspective

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Volume 8 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
By: Buss Krisjanis  
Open Access
|Feb 2016

References

  1. 1. Adams, Guy. “‘The day I realized my toddler was addicted to the iPad’: Three-year-old William tugged at the duvet and woke his father demanding the tablet… at 4am” (January 2014) // http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2548365/As-revealed-one-three-children-use-tablet-talk-fathers-alarming-story-The-day-I-realised-toddler-addicted-iPad.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Beas Rodrigues, Edson. The General Exception Clauses of the TRIPS Agreement: Promoting Sustainable Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.10.1017/CBO9781139084222
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Birnhack, Michael. “Acknowledging Conflict between Copyright Law and Freedom of Expression under the Human Rights Act.” Entertainment Law Review 24 (2003): 1–35.10.2139/ssrn.368961
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Cook, Trevor. “Exceptions and Limitations in European Union Copyright Law.” Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 17 (2012): 243–245.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Cornish, William. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks & Allied Rights. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Dinwoodie, Graeme. “Copyright Lawmaking Authority: An (Inter)Nationalist Perspective on the Treaty Clause.” Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 30 (2007): 355–395.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Dworkin, Ronald, ed. The Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. European Court of Human Rights. “Interlaken Follow-Up” (July 2010) // http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/2010_Interlaken_Follow-up_ENG.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Fatima, Shaheed. Using International Law in Domestic Courts. Portland: Hart Publishing, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Geiger, Christophe, ed. Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.10.4337/9781781001646
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Griffiths, Jonathan, and Uma Suthersanen, eds. Copyright and Free Speech. Comparative and International Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Grosheide, Willem, ed. Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A Paradox. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.10.4337/9781849802048
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Helfer, Laurence, and Graeme Austin. Human Rights and Intellectual Property. Mapping the Global Interface. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511976032
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Helfer, Laurence. “Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Conflict or Coexistence?” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 5 (2003): 47–61.10.2139/ssrn.459120
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Helfer, Laurence. “The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal 49 (2008): 1–52.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Lee, Joo-Young. A Human Rights Framework for Intellectual Property, Innovation and Access to Medicines. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015.10.4324/9781315564845
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. MacNaughton, Gillian, and Diane Frey. “Decent Work for All: A Holistic Human Rights Approach.” American University International Law Review 26 (2011): 441–483.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Mtima, Lateef ed. Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.10.4337/9781783470259
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Nimmer, Melville. “Does Copyright Abridge the First Amendment Guarantees of Free Speech and Press?” University of California Los Angeles Law Review 17 (1970): 1180–1204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Richards, Neil. Intellectual Privacy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Rosati, Eleonora. “Copyright in the EU: In Search of (In)Flexibilities.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 9 (2014): 585–598.10.1093/jiplp/jpu034
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Sadurski, Wojciech. Freedom of Speech and Its Limits. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.10.1007/978-94-010-9342-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Swan, Charles. “When Does Freedom of Speech Trump Copyright?” (February 2013) // http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/media-network-blog/2013/feb/13/freedom-speech-trump-copyright.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Torremans, Paul, ed. Copyright and Human Rights: Freedom of Expression, Intellectual Property, Privacy. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Torremans, Paul. Intellectual Property and Human Rights. Enhanced Edition of Copyright and Human Rights. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Voorhoof, Dirk, and Inger Høedt-Rasmussen. “ECHR: Copyright vs. Freedom of Expression” (January 2013) // http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2013/01/25/echr-copyright-vs-freedom-of-expression/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Waldron, Jeremy. “From Authors to Copiers: Individual Rights and Social Values in Intellectual Property.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 68 (1992): 841–887.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 1. Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal. European Court of Human Rights. 2007, no. 73049/01.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 2. Ashby Donald and Others v. France. European Court of Human Rights. 2013, no. 36769/08.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 3. Ashdown v. Telegraph Group Ltd. Court of Appeal of England and Wales. 2001, 4 All ER 666.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 4. Axel Springer AG v. Germany. European Court of Human Rights. 2012, no. 39954/08.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 5. Balan v. Moldova. European Court of Human Rights. 2008, no. 19247/03.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 6. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. 1886, 1161 U.N.T.S. 3.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 7. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal, 2012, C 326/391.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 8. Chassagnou and Others v. France. European Court of Human Rights. 1999, nos. 25088/94, 28331/95, 28443/95.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 9. Cohen v. California. Supreme Court of the United States. 1971, 403 U.S. 15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 10. Consolidated Version of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal, 2010, C 326/47.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 11. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950, 213 U.N.T.S. 222.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 12. Council Directive 91/250 on the legal protection of computer programmes. Official Journal, 1991, L 122.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 13. Council Directive 92/100 on rental and lending rights and certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property. Official Journal, 1992, L 346.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 14. Council Directive 93/83 on the co-ordination of certain rules concerning copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission. Official Journal, 1993, L 248.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 15. Council Directive 93/98 harmonizing the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights. Official Journal, 1993, L 290.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 16. Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Official Journal, 2001, L 167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 17. Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the legal protection of databases. Official Journal, 1996, L 77.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 18. Eldred v. Ashcroft. Supreme Court of the United States. 2003, 537 U.S. 186.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 19. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises. Supreme Court of the United States. 1985, 471 U.S. 539.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 20. Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden. European Court of Human Rights. 2013, no. 40397/12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 21. Peck v. United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights. 2003, no. 44647/98.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 22. Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom. European Court of Human Rights. 1979, no. 6538/74.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 23. United Nations Vienna Declaration of Programme of Action. 1993, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.157/23.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 24. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948, G.A. Res. 217 (III) A, U.N. Doc. A/RES/217(III).
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 25. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 26. Von Hannover v. Germany. European Court of Human Rights, 2004, no. 59320/00.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. 27. Von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2). European Court of Human Rights, 2012, nos. 40660/08; 60641/08.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2015-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 182 - 202
Submitted on: Dec 2, 2015
|
Accepted on: Dec 31, 2015
|
Published on: Feb 29, 2016
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Copyright,
freedom of expression,
intellectual property,
human rights,
European Court of Human Rights
Related subjects:
Law,
Law, other,
History, philosophy and sociology of law

© 2016 Buss Krisjanis, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)