Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Step Forward in the Harmonization of European Jurisdiction: Regulation Brussels I Recast Cover

A Step Forward in the Harmonization of European Jurisdiction: Regulation Brussels I Recast

Open Access
|Feb 2016

References

  1. 1. Baumgartner, Samuel P. “Recent Reforms in EU Law. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments.” Judicature 97 (2014): 188–195.
  2. 2. Baumgartner, Samuel P. The Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments. Tübingen: Gulde-Druck, 2003 // http://ssrn.com/abstract=719542.
  3. 3. Cook, Justin P. “Pragmatism in the European Union: Recasting the Brussels I Regulation to Ensure the Effectiveness of Exclusive Choice-of-Court Agreements.” Aberdeen Student Law Review 4 (2013): 76–91.
  4. 4. Cuniberti, Gilles, and Isabelle Rueda. “Abolition of Exequatur. Addressing the Commission’s Concerns.” University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 2010-03 (2010) // http://ssrn.com/abstract=1691001.
  5. 5. Dickinson, Andrew, and Eva Lein. The Brussels I Regulation Recast. Oxford University Press, 2015.
  6. 6. Dixon, Martin. Textbook on international Law. 7th ed. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  7. 7. Foster, Nigel. Foster on EU Law. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 2013.10.1093/he/9780199670796.001.0001
  8. 8. Ivanova, Ekaterina. “Choice of Court Clauses and Lis Pendens under Brussels I Regulation.” Merkourios-Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 26 (2009-2010): 12–16.10.5334/ujiel.ab
  9. 9. Kenny, David, and Rosemary Hennigan. “Choice-of-Court Agreements, the Italian Torpedo, and the Recast of the Brussels I Regulation.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 64 (2015): 197–209.10.1017/S0020589314000621
  10. 10. Kuipers, Jan-Jaap. “Party Autonomy in the Brussels I Regulation and Rome I Regulation and the European Court of Justice.” German Law Journal 10 (2009): 1505–1524.10.1017/S2071832200018356
  11. 11. Michaels, Ralf. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”: 1–13. In: Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (MPEPIL) (Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg and Oxford University Press, 2009) // http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1848?rskey=hO56Qj&result=1&prd=EPIL.
  12. 12. Moses, Margaret. “Arbitration/Litigation Interface: The European Debate.” Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 35 (2014): 1–47.
  13. 13. Nielsen, Peter A. “The State of Play of the Recast of the Brussels I Regulation.” Nordic Journal of International Law 81 (2012): 585–603.
  14. 14. Stone, Peter. EU Private International Law: Harmonization of Laws. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.10.4337/9781847201836
  15. 15. Timmer, Laurens J. “Abolition of Exequatur under the Brussels I Regulation: ILL Conceived and Premature?” Journal of Private International Law 9 (2013): 129–147.10.5235/17441048.9.1.129
  16. 1. Allianz SpA v. West Tankers, Inc. Court of Justice of the European Union. 2009, C-185/07.
  17. 2. Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters 1968. OJ L 299, 31/12/1972, p. 0032.
  18. 3. Comments on the Brussels I Regulation on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters // http://dutchcivillaw.com/content/brusselsone000.htm.
  19. 4. Commission Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. COM (1999) 348 final.
  20. 5. Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Recast). COM (2010) 748 final. Brussels, December 17, 2010.
  21. 6. Council Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 of May 29, 2000, on insolvency proceedings. OJ L 160, p. 1.
  22. 7. Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 on jurisdiction and enforcement of judgements in civil and commercial matters. OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.
  23. 8. Erich Gasser GmbH v. MISAT Srl. European Court of Justice. 2003, C-116/02.
  24. 9. France v. Turkey. Permanent Court of International Justice [PCIJ]. 1927, PCIJ Series A no 10, ICGJ 248.
  25. 10. Jenard Report on the Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. OJ 5.3.79 No. 59/1. Brussels, September 27, 1968.
  26. 11. Marc Rich & Co. AG v. SocietaA Italiana Impianti PA. Court of Justice of the European Communities. 1991, C-190/89.
  27. 12. Regulation 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast). OJ L351, p. 1.
  28. 13. Regulation 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of December 12, 2006, creating a European order for payment procedure. OJ L 399, p. 1.
  29. 14. Regulation 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims. OJ L 143, p. 15.
  30. 15. Regulation 861/2007 of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure. OJ L 199, p. 1.
  31. 16. The Tatry v. Maciej Rataj. European Court of Justice. 1994, C-406/92.
  32. 17. Websense International Technology Limited v. ITWAY SpA. Irish Supreme Court. 2014, IESC 5.
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 181
Submitted on: Nov 3, 2015
|
Accepted on: Dec 29, 2015
|
Published on: Feb 29, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Alavi Hamed, Khamichonak Tatsiana, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.