Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Legal Impediments in the EU to New Technologies in the Example of E-Residency Cover

Legal Impediments in the EU to New Technologies in the Example of E-Residency

Open Access
|Feb 2016

References

  1. 1. Al-Khouri, Ali Mohamed. “Digital identity: Transforming GCC economies.”16 (2) (2014): 184–194.
  2. 2. De Andrade, Norberto Norberto Nuno Gomes. “Electronic Identity for Europe: Moving from Problems to Solutions.”8 (2) (2013): 104–109.
  3. 3. De Hert, Paul. “Identity management of e-ID, privacy and security in Europe. A human rights view.”(13) (2008): 71–75.
  4. 4. Drechsler, Wolgang, and Vasilis Kostakis. “Should Law Keep Pace with Technology? Law as Katechon.”34(5-6) (2014): 128–132.
  5. 5. Graux, Hans. “Moving towards a comprehensive legal framework for electronic identification as a trust service in the European Union.”, 8 (2) (2013): 110–117.
  6. 6. Hansen, Marit, Peter Berlich, Jan Camenisch, Sebastian Claus, Andreas Pfitzmann, and Michael Waidner. “Privacy-Enhancing Identity Management.”9 (1) (2004): 35–44.
  7. 7. Hoikkanen, Anssi, Margherita Bacigalupo, Ramón Compañó, Wainer Lusoli, and Ioannis Maghiros. “New Challenges and Possible Policy Options for the Regulation of Electronic Identity.”5 (1), (2010): 1–10.
  8. 8. Karo, Erkki, and Rainer Kattel. “Public Management, Policy Capacity, Innovation and Development.”34(1) (2014): 80–102.
  9. 9. Madise, Ülle, and Priit Vinkel. “Internet Voting in Estonia: From Constitutional Debate to Evaluation of Experience Over Six Elections. Regulating eTechnologies in the European Union”: 53–72. In: Tanel Kerikmäe, ed.. Springer, 2014.
  10. 10. Mahler, Tobias. “Governance Models for Interoperable Electronic Identities.”8 (2) (2013): 148–159.
  11. 11. Martens, Taavi. “Electronic identity management in Estonia between market and state governance.”3 (1) (2010): 213–233.
  12. 12. Nyman-Metcalf, Katrin. “E-Governance in Law and by Law. The Legal Framework of e-governance”: 33–51. In: Tanel Kerikmäe, ed.. Springer, 2014.
  13. 13. Pappel, Ingrid, and Ingmar Pappel. “Implementation of Service-based E-government and Establishment of State IT Components Interoperability at Local Authorities.”(2011) //.
  14. 14. Rundle, Mary,. “At a Crossroads: ‘Personhood’ and Digital Identity in the Information Society.”2007/7 (2008) //.
  15. 15. Särav, Sandra, and Tanel Kerikmäe. “E-Residency – a Cyberdream Embodied in a Digital Identity Card?”: 61–86. In: Tanel Kerikmäe and Addi Rull, eds.. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, 2016.
  16. 16. Saxby, Steve. “Electronic identity: The global challenge.” Presented at the 8International Conference on Legal, Security and Privacy issues in IT Law (LSPI) November 11-15, 2013, Tilleke & Gibbins International Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand.30 (2) (2014): 112–125.
  17. 17. Strauss, Stefan, and Georg Aichholzer. “National Electronic Identity Management: The Challenge of a citizen-centric Approach beyond Technical Design.”1-2 (3) (2010): 12–23.
  18. 18. Zhang, Kunbei. “Incomplete Data Protection Law.”15 (6) 2014): 1071–1104.
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 90
Submitted on: Nov 11, 2015
Accepted on: Dec 28, 2015
Published on: Feb 29, 2016
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Kerikmäe Tanel, Särav Sandra, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.