Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Lessons From The EU-Russia Sanctions 2014-2015 Cover

Lessons From The EU-Russia Sanctions 2014-2015

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Volume 8 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By: Viljar Veebel and  Raul Markus  
Open Access
|Oct 2015

References

  1. 1. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. “Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms and Order in International Society.” International Organization No. 68 (2014): 143-176.10.1017/S0020818313000337
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Blinken, Tony. “Ukraine in the White House Press Briefing” (July 28, 2014) // http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/wh-ukraine-07282014.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Brzoska, Michael. “Putting More Teeth in UN Arms Embargoes”: 125–144. In: D. Cortright and G. A. Lopez, eds. Smart Sanctions: Targeting Economic Statecraft. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Cerni, Boris, and Dina Khrennikova. “Slovenia Wants End to EU Sanctions on Russia That Hurt Trade.” www.bloomberg.com (July 2015) // http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-27/slovenia-wants-to-see-end-of-eu-russia-sanctions-than-hurt-trade.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Cordesman, Anthony H., Bryan Gold, and Chloe Coughlin-Schulte. Iran – Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. “Cutting Russia out of SWIFT banking system would mean ‘war’.” www.rt.com (2015) // http://www.rt.com/business/211291-swift-banking-russia-vtb/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Davis, Lance, and Stanley Engerman. “History Lessons: Sanctions – Neither War nor Peace.” Journal of Economic Perspective Vol. 17, No. 2 (Spring 2003): 187–197.10.1257/089533003765888502
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Delevic, Milica. “Economic sanctions as a foreign policy tool: The case of Yugoslavia.” The International Journal of Peace Studies Vol. 3, No. 1 (1998).
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Dizaji, Sajjad F., and Peter van Bergeijk. “Could Iranian sanctions work? ‘Yes’ and ‘no’, but not ‘perhaps’.” www.voxeu.org (2013) // http://www.voxeu.org/article/could-iranian-sanctions-work-yes-and-no-not-perhaps.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Drezner, Daniel. W. “How Smart are Smart Sanctions.” International Studies Review Vol. 5, No. 1 (2003): 107–110.10.1111/1521-9488.501014
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette. Debates on European Integration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.10.1007/978-0-230-20933-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Escribà-Folch, Abel, and Joseph Wright. “Dealing with Tyranny: International Sanctions and the Survival of Authoritarian Rulers.” International Studies Quarterly Vol. 54, No. 2 (2010): 335–359.10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00590.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. “Eurotrack Survey Results.” YouGov (2014) // http://cdn.yougov.com/cumulus_uploads/document/n1z35e9mya/YG-Archive-140327-Ukraine-Eurotrack.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. “EU sanctions against Russia over Ukraine crisis.” European Union Newsroom (July 19, 2015) // http://europa.eu/newsroom/highlights/special-coverage/eu_sanctions/index_en.htm#5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. “Foreign Direct Investments to Russia.” www.tradingeconomics.com // http://www.tradingeconomics.com/russia/foreign-direct-investment.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Galtung, Johan “On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions: With Examples from the Case of Rhodesia.” World Politics Vol. 19, No. 3 (1967): 378–416.10.2307/2009785
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Giumelli, Francesco, and Paul Ivan. “The effectiveness of EU sanctions.” EPC Issue Paper No. 76 (2013): 1–45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Giumelli, Francesco. Coercing, Constraining and Signalling: Explaining and Understanding International Sanctions after the End of the Cold War. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Giumelli, Francesco. “How EU sanctions work: A new narrative. EU Institute for Security Studies.” Chaillot Paper No. 129 (2013): 5–41.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Giumelli, Francesco. “Who pays for the sanctions on Russia?” www.ecfr.eu (September 5, 2014) // http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_who_pays_for_the_sanctions_on_russia372.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Griswold, Daniel. “Four Decades of Failure: The U.S. Embargo against Cuba.” www.cato.org (2005) // http://www.cato.org/publications/speeches/four-decades-failure-us-embargo-against-cuba.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Groves, Adam. “Are Sanctions an Appropriate Tool for Coercion in International Politics? Why?” www.e-ir.info (2007) // http://www.e-ir.info/2007/12/03/are-sanctions-an-appropriate-tool-for-coercion-in-international-politics-why/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies Vol. 44, No. 5 (1996): 936–957.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Hovi, Jon, Robert Huseby, and Detlef Sprinz. “When Do (Imposed) Sanctions Work?” World Politics Vol. 57, No. 4 (2005): 479–499.10.1353/wp.2006.0011
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Jeffrey J. Schott, Kimberly Ann Elliott, and Barbara Oegg. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. 3rd ed. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Leenders, Leander. “EU Sanctions: A Relevant Foreign Policy Tool?” EU Diplomacy Paper No. 3 (2014): 1–36.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Lektzian, David, and Mark Souva. “The economic peace between democracies: Economic sanctions and domestic institutions.” Journal of Peace Research No. 40 (2003): 641–660.10.1177/00223433030406002
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Oja, Kaspar. “No milk for the Bear, the impact to the Baltic states of Russia’s counter sanctions.” Baltic Journal of Economics Vol. 15, No.1 (2015): 38–49.10.1080/1406099X.2015.1072385
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Osborn, Andrew. “Putin: Collapse of the Soviet Union was ‘catastrophe of the century’.” www.independent.co.uk (April 25, 2005) // http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/putin-collapse-of-the-soviet-union-was-catastrophe-of-the-century-6147493.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. “Resistance grows in the EU to new Russian sanctions.” www.dw.com (2014) // http://www.dw.com/en/resistance-grows-in-eu-to-new-russia-sanctions/a-17903208.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. “Russia core inflation rate.” www.tradingeconomics.com // http://www.tradingeconomics.com/russia/core-inflation-rate.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. “Russia: EU extends economic sanctions by six months, Council of the European Union.” European Council Press Release (June 22, 2015) // http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/06/22-russia-sanctions/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. “Russian Cut off From Banking Backbone Said to be Ruled Out.” www.bloomberg.com (2015) // http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-19/russian-cutoff-from-bank-backbone-said-to-be-ruled-out-as-option.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. “Russian GDP annual growth rate.” www.tradingeconomics.com // http://www.tradingeconomics.com/russia/gdp-growth-annual.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Tostensen, Arne, and Beate Bull. “Are smart sanctions feasible?” World Politics Vol. 54, No. 3 (2002): 373–403.10.1353/wp.2002.0010
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. “U.S. and Europe Set to Toughen Russia Sanctions.” www.nytimes.com (July 28, 2015) // http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/29/world/europe/us-and-europe-agree-to-escalate-sanctions-on-russia.html?_r=0.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Vara, Vauhini. “Hurt Putin hurt yourself.” The New Yorker (August 19, 2014) // http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/hurt-putin-hurt.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Veebel, Viljar, and Raul Markus. “Wirtschaftssanktionen als die Mittel der internationalen Druck.” Estonian Discussions on Economic Policy Vol. 23, No. 1 (2015): 131–151.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Veebel, Viljar. “Will Economic Sanctions fulfil Baltic Expectations in terms of Ukraine and Russia.” Baltic Rim Economies No. 6 (2014): 42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Verdier, Daniel, and Byungwon Woo. “Why rewards are better than sanctions.” Economics & Politics Vol. 23, No. 2 (2011): 220–238.10.1111/j.1468-0343.2010.00380.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. “Weak rouble is here to stay.” The Economist (July 21, 2015) // http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=223362006&Country=Russia&topic=Economy&subtopic=Forecast&subsubtopic=Exchange+rates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. “West sends mixed signals over Russia sanctions, G7, Ukraine crisis.” www.rt.com (2015) // http://www.rt.com/news/223303-eu-russia-sanctions-opinions/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 1. Decision 2014/145/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 78 (17 March 2014).
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 2. Decision 2014/265/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 137 (12 May 2014) [amendment to the criteria for listing (travel bans/asset freezes); amendment to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures].
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 3. Decision 2014/308/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 160 (29 May 2014) [amendment to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures].
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 4. Decision 2014/386/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 365 (19 December 2014) [to expand the restrictive measures on Crimea and Sevastopol relating to finance, goods and tourism].
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 5. Decision 2014/455/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 205 (12 July 2014) [amendment to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures].
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 6. Decision 2014/475/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 214 (19 July 2014) [amendment to the criteria for listing (asset freezes)].
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 7. Decision 2014/508/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 226 (30 July 2014) [amendment to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures].
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 8. Decision 2014/658/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 271/47 (12 September 2014) [amendment to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures; inclusion of persons and entities related to separatist groups in the Donbass region].
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 9. Decision 2014/801/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 331 (18 November 2014) [to amend the reasons for listing one person].
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 10. Decision 2014/855/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 344 (29 November 2014) [to add thirteen individuals and five organisations to the list of those subject to restrictive measures].
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 11. Implementing Decision 2014/151/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 86 (21 March 2014) [amendment to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures].
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. 12. Implementing Decision 2014/238/CFSP. Council of the European Union. OJ L 126 (28 April 2014) [amendment to the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures].
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. 13. On measures to implement the Russian President’s Executive Order ‘On Extending Certain Special Economic Measures in the Interest of Ensuring the Security of the Russian Federation’. Government of Russia (August 2014) // http://government.ru/docs/14195/ [in Russian].
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. 14. Regulation 833/2014. Council of the European Union. OJ L 229/1 (31 July 2014) [concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine].
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. 15. Regulation 960/2014. Council of the European Union. OJ L 271/3 (8 September 2014) [amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. 16. Regulation 1290/2014. Council of the European Union. OJ L 349 (4 December 2014) [amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, and amending Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014].
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. 17. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation no. 156 of 02.21.2015. On the Russian part of the intergovernmental commission on trade-economic and scientific-technical cooperation between Russia and foreign countries. Government of Russia (21 February 2015) // http://government.ru/docs/all/94975/ [in Russian].
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. 18. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation no. 835 of 08.21.2014, On additional measures to regulate the import of meat of cattle and poultry. Government of Russia (21 August 2014) // http://government.ru/docs/all/92613/ [in Russian].
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. 19. Russian President’s Executive Order no. 368, 15.07.2015, On closure of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Crimea and the State Commission for Socio-Economic Development of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol. President of Russia (15 July 2015) // http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/39955 [in Russian].
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2015-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 165 - 194
Submitted on: Jul 10, 2015
|
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2015
|
Published on: Oct 5, 2015
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Sanctions,
conditionality,
European Union,
Russia,
Ukraine
Related subjects:
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Political science,
Political science, other

© 2015 Viljar Veebel, Raul Markus, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)Next article