Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Qualitative Alleviation Of War Reparations In Jus Post Bellum: Analysis Of Travaux Préparatoires Of Article 16 Of The Treaty Of Peace With Japan Cover

Qualitative Alleviation Of War Reparations In Jus Post Bellum: Analysis Of Travaux Préparatoires Of Article 16 Of The Treaty Of Peace With Japan

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Volume 8 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By: Keisuke Minai  
Open Access
|Oct 2015

References

  1. 1. Blum, Gabriella, and Natalie J. Lockwood. “Earthquakes and Wars: The Logic of International Reparations”: 178-216. In: Larry May and Elizabeth Edenberg, eds. Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. New York: CUP, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Boon, Kristen. “Jus Post Bellum in the Age of Terrorism: Introductory Remarks.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 106 (2012): 331-332.10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0331
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Carlyle, Margaret, ed. Documents on International Affairs 1947-1948. London: Oxford University Press, 1952.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Chetail, Vincent. “Introduction: Post-conflict Peacebuilding – Ambiguity and Identity”: 1-33. In: Vincent Chetail, ed. Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon. New York: OUP, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Commonwealth Working Party on Japanese Peace Treaty, 1st May to 17th May, 1950, Report, FO371/83830. The United Kingdom National Archives.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. De Brabandere, Eric. “The Concept of Jus Post Bellum in International Law: A Normative Critique”: 123-141. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Dennett, Raymond, and Robert K. Turner, eds. Documents on American Foreign Relations. Vol. 10. Boston: World Peace Foundation, 1950.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Documents of the Far Eastern Department, FO371/92532. The United Kingdom National Archives.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Dunn, Frederick S. Peace-Making and the Settlement with Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.10.1515/9781400878420
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Easterday, Jennifer. “Jus Post Bellum in the Age of Terrorism: Remarks by Jennifer Easterday.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 106 (2012): 335-337.10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0335
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Easterday, Jennifer S. “Peace Agreements as a Framework for Jus Post Bellum”: 379-415. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Iverson, Jens. “Contrasting the Normative and Historical Foundations of Transitional Justice and Jus Post Bellum: Outlining the Matrix of Definitions in Comparative Perspective”: 80-101. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Iverson, Jens, Jennifer S. Easterday, and Carsten Stahn. “Epilogue: Jus Post Bellum – Strategic Analysis and Future Directions”: 542-553. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Japanese Peace Treaty: General (C.P.(50)323). The United Kingdom National Archives.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Japanese Peace Treaty: Memorandum by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (C.P.(51)137). The United Kingdom National Archives.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Japanese Peace Treaty. Summary Records of Meetings, FO371/92557. The United Kingdom National Archives.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Kesaris, Paul, ed. Documents of the National Security Council [microfilm]. Vol. 1, A:I:0301, A:I:0326. Washington, D.C.: University Publications of America, 1980.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. May, Larry. “Jus Post Bellum, Grotius, and Meionexia”: 15-25. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. May, Larry. “Jus Post Bellum in the Age of Terrorism: Remarks by Larry May.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 106 (2012): 332-334.10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0332
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. May, Larry. “Jus Post Bellum Proportionality and the Fog of War.” European Journal of International Law 24(1) (2013): 315-333.10.1093/ejil/chs084
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. May, Larry. “Reparations, Restitution, and Transitional Justice”: 32-48. In: Larry May and Andrew T. Forcehimes, eds. Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. New York: CUP, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. May, Larry, and Elizabeth Edenberg. “Introduction”: 1-25. In: Larry May and Elizabeth Edenberg, eds. Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. New York: CUP, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. May, Larry, and Andrew T. Forcehimes. “Introduction”: 1-10. In: Larry May and Andrew T. Forcehimes, eds. Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. New York: CUP, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Memorandum by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (C.P.(51)104). The United Kingdom National Archives.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ed. Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy: Records Related to the Conclusion of Treaty of Peace with Japan. Vol. 2, 3, 4, 5. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ed. Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy: Treaty of Peace with Japan Preparatory Work. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ed. Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy: Treaty of Peace with Japan Negotiation with the United States. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Provisional Verbatim Minutes of the Conference for the Conclusion and Signature of the Treaty of Peace with Japan. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1951.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Neff, Stephen C. “Conflict Termination and Peace-making in the Law of Nations: A Historical Perspective”: 77-91. In: Carsten Stahn and Jann K. Kleffner, eds. Jus Post Bellum – Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace. Hague: T·M·C·Asser Press, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Österdahl, Inger. “Just War, Just Peace and the Jus post Bellum.” Nordic Journal of International Law 81 (2012): 271-294.10.1163/15718107-08103003
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Österdahl, Inger, and Esther van Zadel. “What Will Jus Post Bellum Mean? Of New Wine and Old Bottles.” Journal of Conflict & Security Law 14(2) (2009): 175-207.10.1093/jcsl/krp018
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Overseas Consultants, Inc. Report on Industrial Reparations Survey of Japan to the United States of America February 1948. New York: Overseas Consultants, 1948.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Pauley, Edwin E. Report on Japanese Reparations to the President of the United States: November 1945 to April 1946. Washington, D.C.: Division of Publications Office of Public Affairs, 1946.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Records of Proceedings: Conference for the Conclusion and Signature of the Treaty of Peace with Japan. Washington, D.C.: Department of State, 1951.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Records of the Office of the Historian. Japanese Peace and Security Treaties, 1946-1952 [microfilm] (Lot File 78 D 173). Modern Japanese Political History Materials Room, Japanese National Diet Library.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Records of the Office of Northeast Asian Affairs, Relating to the Treaty of Peace with Japan [microfilm] – Subject File, 1945-51 (Lot File 56 D 527). Modern Japanese Political History Materials Room, Japanese National Diet Library.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Ronzitti, Natalino. “Reparation and Compensation”: 638-659. In: Nigel D. White and Christian Henderson, eds. Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, and Jus post Bellum. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Sari, Aurel. “The Status of Foreign Armed Forces Deployed in Post-Conflict Environments: A Search for Basic Principles”: 467-501. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Sassòli, Marco. “Reparation”: 279-290. In: Vincent Chetail, ed. Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon. New York: OUP, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Stahn, Carsten. “‘Jus ad bellum’, ‘jus in bello’ … ‘jus post bellum’? – Rethinking the Conception of the Law of Armed Force.” European Journal of International Law 17(5) (2007): 921-943.10.1093/ejil/chl037
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Stahn, Carsten. “Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Discipline(s)”: 93-112. In: Carsten Stahn and Jann K. Kleffner, eds. Jus Post Bellum – Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace. Hague: T·M·C·Asser Press, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Stahn, Carsten. “The Future of Jus Post Bellum”: 231-237. In: Carsten Stahn and Jann K. Kleffner, eds. Jus Post Bellum – Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace. Hague: T·M·C·Asser Press, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 43. United States Department of State. [1945] Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol, 6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 44. United States Department of State. [1947] Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol, 6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 45. United States Department of State. [1950] Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol, 6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 46. United States Department of State. [1951] Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol, 6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 47. Yasamee, Heather J. and Hamilton, K. A., eds. Documents on British Policy Overseas. Series 2, Vol. 4. London: HMSO, 1991.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Yoshida, Shigeru. Kaisō Jūnen [Ten Years Memoirs]. Vol. 3. Tokyo: Chuokoron-sha, INC, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Yoshida, Shigeru. The Yoshida Memoirs: The Story of Japan in Crisis. Translated by Kenichi Yoshida. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1973.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2015-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 27
Submitted on: Mar 25, 2015
|
Accepted on: May 29, 2015
|
Published on: Oct 5, 2015
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Post-war Peacebuilding,
Treaty of Peace with Japan,
War Reparations
Related subjects:
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Political science,
Political science, other

© 2015 Keisuke Minai, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 8 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)Next article