References
- AB Group v. Werthur [1997], 75 CA 4th 1022, 69 CR 2d 652.
- Bachiashvili, V. (2013), ‘Defining contract according to the principles of European contract law and advisability of its implementation into Georgian legislation,’ [in Georgian] TSU Faculty of Law Journal of Law, no. 1.
- Baumbach, A. & Hopt, K. J., eds. (2018), HGB Kommentar, 38. Auflage, Munich: C. H. Beck.
- Baumbach, A. & Hueck, A., eds. (2019), GmbHG Kommentar, 22. Auflage, Munich: C. H. Beck.
- Boguslavski, L. & Knieper, R., eds. (1988), Wege zu neuem Recht, Berlin: Arno Spitz GmbH Verlag.
- Bork, R. & Schäfer, C., eds. (2012), GmbHG Kommentar, 2. Auflage, 2012, Cologne: RWS Verlag.
- Bregvadze, L. (2006), ‘Legal culture between globalism and localism: for the functional definition of legal transfers’ [in Georgian], The Herald of State and Law Institute of T. Tsereteli, no. 1, pp. 5–37.
- Brinkmann, M.; Völzmann-Stickelbrock, B.; Effer-Uhe, D. O.; Wesser, S. & Weth, S., eds. (2018), Dogmatik im Dienst von Gerechtigkeit, Rechtssicherheit und Rechtsentwicklung, Festschrift für Hans Prütting zum 70. Geburtstag, Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag.
- BT-I v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc’y [1999], 75 CA 4th 1406, 89 CR2d 811.
- Burduli, I. (2010), ‘Legal outcome of non-payment of contribution: the utopic point on the expulsion of a partner from joint stock company’ [in Georgian], TSU Faculty of Law, Journal of Law, nos. 1–2.
- Burduli, I., ed. (2011), Corporate Law Collection [in Georgian], Tbilisi: “Meridiani”.
- Burduli, I. (2013a), Foundations of Joint Stock Company Law [in Georgian], Tbilisi.
- Burduli, I. (2013b), ‘Gesellschaftsrecht in Georgien und seine Entwicklungstendenzen,’ Kieler Ostrechts-Notizen, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 28–35.
- Burduli, I. & Magradze, G. (2019), ‘Grounds for expulsion of partner from Ltd.,’ Yearbook of the Center for Law and Economics, pp. 25–49.
- Burduli, I.; Makharoblishvili, G.; Egnatashvili, D. & Giguashvili, G. (2016), Development of Modern Georgian Company Law [in Georgian], Tbilisi: “World of Lawyers”.
- Burduli, I.; Makharoblishvili, G. & Magradze, G. (2019), Closely Held Corporations in Georgia: Existing Reality and Regulatory Deficit [in Georgian], Tbilisi: “World of Lawyers”.
- Burduli, I. & Egnatashvili, D. (2017), Commentary to the Civil Code of Georgia [in Georgian], Book I, Tbilisi.
- Butler, H. N.; Larry, E. & Ribstein, L. E. (1990), ‘Opting out of fiduciary duties: a response to the anti-contractarians,’ Washington Law Review, vol. 65, no. 1.
- Chanturia, l., ed.; Gelashvili, I.; Rusiashvili, G.; Aladashvili, A.; Meskhishvili, K.; Motsonelidze, N.; Batlidze, G.; Jorbenadze, S.; Svanadze, G.; Gatserelia, A. & Robakidze, I. (2019), Commentary to Civil Code of Georgia [in Georgian], Book III, Tbilisi.
- Chanturia, L. & Ninidze, T. (2003), Commentaries to the Law on Entrepreneurs [in Georgian], Tbilisi.
- Chitashvili, N. (2016), ‘Concept of fundamental breach in comparative perspective and its impact on Georgian law,’ Polish-Georgian Law Review, Faculty of Law and Administration University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn Faculty of Law Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, no. 2, pp. 49–93.
- Chiusi, T. J. & Burduli, I., eds. (2019), Rechtsvergleichung und Privatrecht im deutsch-georgischen Diskurs, Saarbrücken: Verlag Alma Mater.
- Chochia, A. (2013), Models of European Integration: Georgia’s Economic and Political Transition, PhD thesis, Tallinn University of Technology, TUT Press.
- Chochia, A. & Popjanevski, J. (2016), ‘Change of power and its influence on country’s Europeanization process. Case study: Georgia,’ in T. Kerikmäe & A. Chochia (eds.) Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_1310.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_13
- Coffee, J. C. (1989), ‘The mandatory/enabling balance in corporate law: an essay on the judicial role,’ Columbia Law Review, Contractual Freedom in Corporate Law; Articles & Comments, vol. 89, no. 7, pp. 1618–1691. https://doi.org/10.2307/112281410.2307/1122814
- Dalley, P. J. (1999), ‘The law of partner expulsions: fiduciary duty and good faith,’ Cardozo Law Review, vol. 21, pp. 181–210.
- Dalley, P. J. (2001), ‘To whom it may concern: fiduciary duties and business associations,’ Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 515–561.
- Dannemann, G. & Vogenauer, S. (2013), The Common European Sales Law in Context, Interactions with English and German Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678907.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678907.001.0001
- Decision of the Austrian Supreme Court of Justice, OGH 1 Ob 135/06v., 17.10.2006.
- Decision of the Austrian Supreme Court of Justice, OGH 1 Ob 600/53, 25.11.1953.
- Decision of the Austrian Supreme Court of Justice, OGH 6 Ob 80/11z., 14.9.2011.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia, Civil, Company and Insolvency Law Cases Chamber on the case no. AS-390-741-07.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia, Chamber for Company Law and Insolvency Cases on the case no. 3/747-01, 2.11.2001.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia on the case no. 3/530-02.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia on the case no. 3k/303-01.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia on the case no. 3k/861-01.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia no. AS-475-443-2017.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia no. AS-471-450-2015.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia no. AS-771-732-2013.
- Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia no. AS-1060-1090-2011.
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc. [1975], 328 N.E.2d 505.
- Draft Common Frame of Reference (2009) ‘Termination of Fundamental Non-Performance’ 3:502 in C. von Bar et al. (eds.) Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference, Munich: Sellier.
- Gartenberg, E. & King, T. (2003), ‘Fiduciary duties in partnerships and limited liability companies under California law,’ California Business Law Practitioner, Fall 2003, pp. 93–104.
- Gehrlein, M.; Ekkenga, J. & Simon, S., eds. (2012), GmbHG Kommentar, 1. Auflage, Cologne: Karl Heymanns.
- Graffi, L. (2003), ‘Case law on the concept of “fundamental breach” in the Vienna Sales Convention,’ International Business Law Journal, no. 3, pp. 338–349.
- Grunewald, B. (2017), Gesellschaftsrecht, 10. Auflage, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.10.1628/978-3-16-155222-9
- Gummert, H. & Weipert, L., eds. (2009), Münchener Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts, Band 1, 3. Auflage, Munich: C. H. Beck.
- Henssler, M. & Strohn, L., eds. (2014), Gesellschaftsrecht, 2. Auflage, Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.
- Johnson, S. (2002), ‘Duties under the Utah Revised Limited Liability Company Act: analysis of a statutory conflict,’ Utah Law Review, vol. 551, p. 551.
- Kalss, S.; Burger, C. & Eckert, G., eds. (2003), Die Entwicklung des österreichischen Aktienrechts: Geschichte und Materialien, Vienna: Linde Verlag.
- Kindl, J. (2019), Gesellschaftsrecht, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden: Verlag Nomos.
- Klass, G. (2018), Interpretation and Construction in Contract, Georgetown University Law Center, pp. 1–48. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.291322810.2139/ssrn.2913228
- Knieper, R. (2002), ‘Das neue turkmenische Zivilgesetzbuch im Überblick,’ Wirtschaft und Recht in Osteuropa (WiRO), vol. 2/2002.
- Knieper, R.; Chanturia, L. & Schramm, H. J., eds. (2008), Grundlagen des Zivilrechtsordnung in den Staaten des Kaukasus und Zentralasien in Theorie und Praxis, Berlin: BWV.
- Koch, J. (2019), Gesellschaftsrecht, 11. Auflage, Munich: C. H. Beck.
- Korn, S. (2017), Der störende GmbH-Gesellschafter, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.
- Kraakman, R.; Armour, J.; Davies, P.; Enriques, L.; Hansmann, H.; Hertig, G.; Hopt, K.; Kanda, H.; Pargendler, M.; Ringe, W.-G. & Rock, E. (2017), The Anatomy of Corporate Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.0001
- Kropholler, J. (2014), German Civil Code: Study Comments [in Georgian], Tbilisi.
- Kurzynsky-Singer, E. (2014), ‘Wirkungsweise der legal transplants bei den Reformen des Zivilrechts,’ in E. Kurzynsky-Singer (ed.) Transformation durch Rezeption? Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, no. 102, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-153320-410.1628/978-3-16-153320-4
- Law on Entrepreneurs of Georgia, Records of the Parliament of Georgia, no. 21–22, 28.10.1994.
- Leff v. Gunter [1993], 33 C3d 508, 514, 18 CR 777.
- Lutter, K. & Hommelhof, B., eds. (2012), GmbH-Gesetz Kommentar, Cologne: Otto Schmidt.10.9785/ovs.9783504380236
- Löwisch, M. (2003), ‘New law of obligations in Germany,’ Ritsumeikan Law Review, no. 20, pp. 141–156.
- Macharadze, M. (2008), ‘Exiting and termination of the contract—difference and legal outcomes’ [in Georgian], Georgian Law Review, Special Edition, no. 125, pp. 129, 135.
- Markesinis, S. B.; Unberath, H. & Johnston, A. (2006), The German Law of Contract—A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Oxford & Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
- Mattei, U. (1994), ‘Efficiency in legal transplants: an essay in comparative law and economics,’ International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90032-910.1016/0144-8188(94)90032-9
- Moore, T. S. (2000), ‘The policy of opting-out of the fiduciary duties in a limited liability company: McConnell v. Hunt Sports Enterprises, 725 N.E.2D 1193 (OHIO CT. APP. 1999),’ South Texas Law Review, vol. 42, p. 183.
- Mossler, P. (2002), Rücktrittsrecht vor Fälligkeit bei solvenzbedingten Zweifelnan der Leistungsfähigkeit des Schuldners (para. 323 IV BGB), ZIP.
- Papava, L. (2015), Economy of Georgia, Reforms and Pseudo Reforms [in Georgian], Tbilisi.
- Pheradze, G., ed. (2019), Studies of History of Law and Political Thinking [in Georgian], Book IV, Tbilisi: “Meridiani”.
- Pepper v. Litton [1939], 308 U.S. 295, 311.
- Principles of European Contract Law (PECL), Art. 8:103 Fundamental Non-Performance, Art. 1:301 (4) Meaning of Terms, European Union.
- Prütting, H.; Wegen, G. & Weinrich, G., eds. (2020), BGB Kommentar, 15 Auflage, Cologne: Verlag Luchterhand.
- Raiser, T. & Veil, R. (2006), Recht der Kapitalgesellschaften, 4. Auflage, Munich: Verlag Franz Vahlen.
- Reimann, M. (2009), ‘The good, the bad, and the ugly: the reform of the German law of obligations,’ Tulane Law Review, vol. 83, pp. 877–898.
- Roche, V. M. (2003), ‘“Bashing the corporate shield”: the untenable evisceration of freedom of contract in the corporate context,’ The Journal of Corporation Law, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 289–310.
- Roth, H. & Altmeppen, G., eds. (2012), GmbHG Kommentar, 7. Auflage, Munich: C. H. Beck.
- Ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia on the case no. AS-556-939-06.
- Scogin, H. T., Jr. (1993), ‘Withdrawal and expulsion in Germany: a comparative perspective on the “close corporation problem”,’ Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 127–188.
- Saenger, I. (2018), Gesellschaftsrecht, Munich: Verlag Vranz Vahlen.10.15358/9783800658190
- Saenger, I. & Inhester, M., eds. (2020), GmbHG, Handkommentar, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden: Verlag Nomos.
- Schmidt, K., ed. (2011), Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch, 3. Auflage, Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.
- Scholz, F. (1942), Ausschliessung und Austritt aus der GmbH, Cologne: Bachem.
- Scholz, F. (2018), GmbHG Kommentar, 12. Auflage, Cologne: Verlag Otto Schmidt.
- Windbichler, C. (2013), Gesellschaftsrecht, 23. Auflage, Munich: Verlag C. H. Beck.
- Zimmermann, R. (2002), Breach of Contract and Remedies under the New German Law of Obligations, Saggi: Conferenze e seminari, Roma: Centro di studi e ricerche di diritto comparato e straniero.
- Zoidze, B. (2001), Commentaries to the Civil Code [in Georgian], Book III, Tbilisi.
- Zoidze, B. (2005), Reception of European Private Law in Georgia [in Georgian], Tbilisi.