References
- Asheim, B. (2007), ‘Differentiated knowledge band varieties of regional innovation systems,’ Innovation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351161070172284610.1080/13511610701722846
- Asheim, B. T.; Boschma, R. & Cooke, P. (2011), ‘Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases,’ Regional Studies, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.54312610.1080/00343404.2010.543126
- Asheim, B. T. & Coenen, L. (2005), ‘Knowledge base and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters,’ Research Policy, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1173-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.01310.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
- Asheim, B.; Coenen, L. & Vang, J. (2007), ‘Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge base: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy,’ Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 655-670. https://doi.org/10.1068/c064810.1068/c0648
- Asheim, B. T. & Gertler, M. S. (2005), ‘The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems,’ in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.001110.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011
- Autant-Bernard, C.; Billand, P.; Frachisse, D. & Massard, N. (2007), ‘Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in Micro and Nanotechnologies,’ Papers in Regional Science, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00132.x10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00132.x
- Balachandran, S. & Hernandez, E. (2018), ‘Networks and innovation: accounting for structural and institutional sources of recombination in brokerage triads,’ Organization Science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.116510.1287/orsc.2017.1165
- Balland, P. A. (2012), ‘Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and development projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) industry,’ Regional Studies, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.52912110.1080/00343404.2010.529121
- Blažek, J. & Kadlec, V. (2019), ‘Knowledge bases, R&D structure and socio- economic and innovation performance of European regions,’ Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.149100010.1080/13511610.2018.1491000
- Borgatti, S. P. (2002), NetDraw: Graph visualization software, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
- Boschma, R. (2005), ‘Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment,’ Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434005200032088710.1080/0034340052000320887
- Boschma, R. (2018), ‘A concise history of the knowledge base literature: challenging questions for future research,’ in A. Isaksen, R. Martin & M. Trippl (eds.) New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lesson, Cham: Springer, pp. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_210.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_2
- Chen, S. H., Egbetokun, A. A. & Chen, D. K. (2015), ‘Brokering knowledge in networks: institutional intermediaries in the Taiwanese biopharmaceutical innovation system,’ International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 69, no. 3/4, pp. 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2015.07297810.1504/IJTM.2015.072978
- CIP (2015), Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme, 2007–2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/cip/ [accessed 11 Apr 2020]
- Coenen, L.; Moodysson, J.; Ryan, C. D.; Asheim, B. R. & Phillips, P. (2006), ‘Comparing a pharmaceutical and an agro-food bioregion: on the importance of knowledge base for socio-spatial patterns of innovation,’ Industry and Innovation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271060103293710.1080/13662710601032937
- Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation,’ Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/239355310.2307/2393553
- Connected Health (2015) Connected Health cluster strategy 2015–2020, Tehnopol, European Connected Health Alliance. Retrieved from https://www.tehnopol.ee/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Connected-Health-klastri-strateegia.pdf [accessed 12 April 2018]
- CORDIS (2020), Community Research and Development Information Service [Home page]. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/ [accessed 11 April 2020]
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. ([1983] 1991), ‘The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,’ in W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/209510110.2307/2095101
- Eder, J. (2019), ‘Innovation in the periphery: a critical survey and research agenda,’ International Regional Science Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001761876427910.1177/0160017618764279
- European Commission (2016), Strategic Plan 2016–2020, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Ares(2016)1051529, 1.3.2016. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/strategic-plan-2016-2020-research-and-innovation_en [accessed 10 January 2020]
- European Innovation Scoreboard (2019), ‘Main Report.’ Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/38781 [accessed 10 April 2020]
- Fontes, M. (2005), ‘Distant networking: the knowledge acquisition strategies of ‘out-cluster’ biotechnology firms,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 899-920. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431050018849810.1080/09654310500188498
- Fransman, M. (2008), ‘Disaggregating firms in analysing the costs and benefits of the university–industry relationship: based on an analytical and empirical study from Scotland,’ Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 17, nos. 1–2, pp. 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859070127949010.1080/10438590701279490
- Fritsch, M. & Kauffeld-Monz, M. (2010), ‘The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks,’ The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0245-810.1007/s00168-008-0245-8
- Gould, R. V. & Fernandez, R. M. (1989), ‘Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks,’ Sociological Methodology, vol. 19, pp. 89–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/27094910.2307/270949
- Granovetter, M. S. (1973), ‘The strength of weak ties,’ American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/22546910.1086/225469
- Hanneman, R. A. & Riddle, M. (2005), Introduction to Social Network Methods, Riverside: University of California.
- Hargadon, A. & Sutton, R. I. (1997), ‘Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm,’ Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 716–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/239365510.2307/2393655
- Helfen, M. (2015), ‘Institutionalizing precariousness? The politics of boundary work in legalizing agency work in Germany, 1949–2004’, Organization Studies, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1387–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084061558533810.1177/0170840615585338
- Herstad, S. J.; Aslesen, H. W. & Ebersberger, B. (2014), ‘On industrial knowledge base, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages,’ Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.00310.1016/j.respol.2013.08.003
- IC-INTAS (2014), International Association for the promotion of cooperation with scientists from the independent states of the former Soviet Union, 1993– [Home page]. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/programme/rcn/493_en.html [accessed 11 April 2020]
- IS-ECONTENT (2001), eContent Programme, 2001–2004, [Home page]. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/16411-econtent-details-available [accessed 11 April 2020]
- Kalantaridis, C.; Küttim, M.; Govind, M. & Sousa, C. (2017), ‘How to commercialise university-generated knowledge internationally? A comparative analysis of contingent institutional conditions,’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 123, pp. 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.01310.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.013
- Kauffeld-Monz, M. & Fritsch, M. (2013), ‘Who are the brokers of knowledge in regional systems of innovation? A multi-actor network analysis,’ Regional Studies, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340100371336510.1080/00343401003713365
- Kenney, M. & Patton, D. (2009), ‘Reconsidering the Bayh–Dole Act and the current university invention ownership model,’ Research Policy, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1407–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.00710.1016/j.respol.2009.07.007
- Kim, C.; Park, S. H. & Seol, B. M. (2018), ‘The role of universities for the change of a network structure in the regional business ecosystem,’ Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-04-2018-04410.1108/APJIE-04-2018-044
- Krackhardt, D. (1992), ‘The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations,’ in N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (eds.) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 216–239.
- Kunegis, J. (2017), Handbook of Network Analysis KONECT – the Koblenz Network Collection, University of Namur, Belgium naXys, Namur Center for Complex Systems.
- Laerd Statistics (2018), ‘Kruskal-Wallis H Test using SPSS Statistics.’ Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/kruskal-wallis-h-test-using-spss-statistics.php [accessed 10 January 2019]
- Langley, A.; Lindberg, K.; Mørk, B. E.; Nicolini, D.; Raviola, E. & Walter, L. (2019), ‘Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: from cartography to process,’ Academy of Management Annals, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 704–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.008910.5465/annals.2017.0089
- Lauk, K. & Allik, J. (2018), ‘A puzzle of Estonian science: how to explain unexpected rise of the scientific impact’, Trames, vol. 22(72/67), no. 4, pp. 329–344. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2018.4.0110.3176/tr.2018.4.01
- Lissoni, F. (2010), ‘Academic inventors as brokers,’ Research Policy, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.00510.1016/j.respol.2010.04.005
- Liu, J.; Chaminade, C. & Asheim, B. (2013), ‘The geography and structure of global innovation networks: a knowledge base perspective,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1456–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.75584210.1080/09654313.2012.755842
- Martin, R. (2013), ‘Differentiated knowledge bases and the nature of innovation networks,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1418–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.75583610.1080/09654313.2012.755836
- Mattes, J. (2012), ‘Dimensions of proximity and knowledge base: innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors,’ Regional Studies, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1085-1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.55249310.1080/00343404.2011.552493
- Moedas, C. & Smits, R.-J. (2015), ‘30 years, European research programmes 1984–2014,’ Horizon Magazine, Special issue, March 2015.
- Morgan, G. A.; Leech, N. L.; Gloeckner, G. W. & Barrett, K. C. (2012), IBM SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation,’ New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203127315
- Murashova, E. & Loginova, V. (2017), ‘University–industry interaction trends in the Baltic Sea Region: a bibliometric analysis,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-000910.1515/bjes-2017-0009
- Nooteboom, B. (2003), ‘Problems and solutions in knowledge transfer,’ in D. Fornahl & T. Brenner (eds.) Cooperation, Networks and Institutions: Regional Innovation Systems, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 105–127.
- Owen-Smith, J. M. & Powell, W. W. (2004), ‘Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community,’ Organization Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.005410.1287/orsc.1030.0054
- Ponds, R.; Van Oort, F. & Frenken, K. (2007), ‘The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration,’ Papers in Regional Science, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x
- Prell, C. (2012), Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology, Los Angeles: SAGE.
- Reillon, V. (2017), EU Framework Programmes for Research and Innovation: Evolution and Key Data from FP1 to Horizon 2020 in View of FP9, European Parliamentary Research Service.
- Salavisa, I.; Sousa, C. & Fontes, M. (2012), ‘Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties,’ Technovation, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.00310.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.003
- Scott, J. (2013), Social Network Analysis, Los Angeles: SAGE.
- Scott, W. R. (2008), Institutions and Organizations, 3rd ed., Los Angeles: SAGE.
- Shingala, M. C. & Rajyaguru, A. (2015), ‘Comparison of post hoc tests for unequal variance,’ International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 22–33.
- Smart Specialisation (2017a), Strengthening Innovation in Estonia, Regional Policy Factsheet. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/factsheets/2017/smart-specialisation-strengthening-innovation-in-estonia [accessed 11 April 2020]
- Smart Specialisation (2017b), Strengthening Innovation in Latvia, Regional Policy Factsheet. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/factsheets/2017/smart-specialisation-strengthening-innovation-in-latvia [accessed 11 April 2020]
- Smart Specialisation (2017c), Strengthening Innovation in Lithuania, Regional Policy Factsheet. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/factsheets/2017/smart-specialisation-strengthening-innovation-in-lithuania [accessed 11 April 2020]
- Steinmo, M. & Rasmussen, E. (2016),’ How firms collaborate with public research organizations: the evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects,’ Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1250-1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.00610.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006
- Ter Wal, A. L. J. & Boschma, R. A. (2009), ‘Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues,’ The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-310.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
- UN (2020), ‘Geographic regions,’ United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/ [accessed 11 April 2020]
- Weterings, A. & Ponds, R. (2009), ‘Do regional and non-regional knowledge flows differ? An empirical study on clustered firms in the Dutch life sciences and computing services industry,’ Industry and Innovation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271090272803510.1080/13662710902728035
- Zietsma, C.; Groenewegen, P.; Logue, D. M. & Hinings, C. R. (2017), ‘Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields,’ Academy of Management Annals, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 391–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.005210.5465/annals.2014.0052