References
- Amatucci, A. (2016), ‘Foundation of the contemporary ability-to-pay principle in taxation in the thought of Saint Thomas Aquinas,’ in H. Jochum et al. (eds.) Practical Problems in European and International Tax Law: Essays in Honour of Manfred Mössner, Amsterdam: IBFD, ch. 1.
- Cadbury Schweppes plc and Cadbury Schweppes Overseas v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue [2006], CJEU C-196/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:544.
- Cédelle, A. (2016), The EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive: A UK Perspective, Oxford University Center for Business Taxation Working Paper Series, WP 16/14.
- Collier, R.; Kari, S.; Ropponen, O.; Simmler, M. & Todtenhaupt, M. (2018), Dissenting the EU’s Recent Anti-Tax Avoidance Measures: Merits and Problem, EconPol Policy Report, no. 08, vol. 2.
- Commission Proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market, COM(2016) 26 final, 2016/0011 (CNS), 28.1.2016.
- Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council for an Action plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion, COM (2012) 8806 final, 6.12.2012.
- Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, pp. 47–200.
- Council Directive 2003/49/EC of 3 June 2003 on a common system of taxation applicable to interest and royalty payments made between associated companies of different Member States, OJ L 157, 26.6.2003, pp. 49–54.
- Council Directive (EU) 2011/96/EU of 30 November 2011 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States (recast), OJ L 345, 29.12.2011, p. 8.
- Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 on laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market, OJ L 193, 19.7.2016, pp. 1–14.
- de Wilde, M. F. (2018), ‘Is the ATAD’s GAAR a Pandora’s box?’ in P. Pistone & D. Weber (eds.) The Implementation of Anti-BEPS Rules in the EU: A Comprehensive Study, Amsterdam: IBFD, pp. 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.304070910.2139/ssrn.3040709
- Estonian Commercial Code, RT I 1995, 26, 355; RT I, 28.02.2019, 1.
- Estonian Income Tax Act, RT I 1999, 101, 903; RT I, 19.03.2019, 13.
- Estonian Law of Obligations Act, RT I 2001, 81, 487; RT I, 20.02.2019, 2.10.31080/ASGIS.2019.02.0054
- Estonian Taxation Act, RT I 2002, 26, 150; RT I, 06.11.2019, 1.
- Explanatory memorandum to the bill of law no. 705 SE on amendments to the Income Tax Act, Estonian Parliament, 12.12.2018. Retrieved from https://www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/97180f59-7b6f-4797-aa2d-d6604039633b [accessed 1 Jan 2020]
- Gutmann, D. et al. (2017), ‘The impact of the ATAD on domestic systems: a comparative survey,’ European Taxation, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 2–20.
- Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs v. Newey [2013], CJEU C-653/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:409.
- Kallas v. Estonia [2017], Criminal Chamber of the Estonian Supreme Court, no. 1-15-9051, 6.10.2017.
- Kõrgesaar v. Tax Board [2001], Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court, no. 3-3-1-57-00, 15.1.2001.
- Lazarov, I. & Govind, S. (2019), ‘Carpet-bombing tax avoidance in Europe: examining the validity of the ATAD under EU law,’ Intertax, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 852–868.
- Lehis, L. (2012), Maksuõigus [Tax law], 3rd ed., Tallinn: Juura.
- Lenaerts, K. & Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A. (2013), To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice, Distinguished Lecture delivered on the occasion of the XXIV Law of the European Union course of the Academy of European Law, on 6 July 2013, EUI Working Papers, AEL 2013/9.
- Lind, K. (2003), ‘Tulu mõiste’ [The definition of income], Juridica, no. 5, pp. 338–348.
- Maisuradze, L. (2017), The Anti-Avoidance Directive and its Compatibility with Primary EU Law, MA thesis defended at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lund.
- Maret Lilleorg v. Tax Board [2012], Administrative Chamber of the Estonian Supreme Court, no. 3-3-1-79-11, 13.2.2012.
- Marge Sirge v. Tax Board [2011], Administrative Chamber of Estonian Supreme Court, no. 3-3-1-15-11, 25.4.2011.
- N Luxembourg 1 and Others v. Skatteministeriet [2019], CJEU Joined Cases C-115/16, C-118/16, C-119/16 and C-299/16, ECLI:EU:C:2019:134.
- O. and B. v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel [2014], CJEU C-456/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:135.
- Opinion of the Advocate General Mr Leger in the case of C-196/04 Cadbury Schweppes plc and Cadbury Schweppes Overseas v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue, 2006 I-07995, 2.5.2006, ECLI:EU:C:2006:278.
- OÜ AH Seenior v. Tax Board [2017], Administrative Chamber of the Estonian Supreme Court, no. 3-3-1-78-16, 9.6.2017.
- Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v. Secretary of State for Health [2016], CJEU C-547/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:325.
- Piantavigna, P. (2018), ‘The role of the subjective element in tax abuse and aggressive tax planning,’ World Tax Journal, vol. 10, no. 2.
- Pistone, P. et al., eds. (2019), Fundamentals of Taxation: An Introduction to Tax Policy, Tax Law and Tax Administration, Amsterdam: IBFD.
- Polbud — Wykonawstwo [2017], CJEU C-106/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:804.
- Rigaut, A. (2016), ‘European Union – anti-tax avoidance Directive (2016/1164): new EU policy horizons,’ European Taxation, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 504–505.
- Saare, K.; Volens, U.; Vutt, A. & Vutt, M. (2015), Ühinguõigus I [Company law], Tallinn: Juura.
- Schønberg, S. & Frick, K. (2003), ‘Finishing, refining, polishing: on the use of travaux preparatoires as an aid to the interpretation of community legislation,’ European Law Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 149–171.
- Statement by the Committee on Taxation 2015/16:SkU28, Subsidiarity check of proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market (COM(2016) 26). Reasoned opinion from the Swedish Parliament. Retrieved from https://secure.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/scrutiny/CNS20160011/serik.do [accessed 1 Jan 2020]
- Zimmer, F. (2019), ‘OECD/European Union/International – In Defence of General Anti-Avoidance Rules,’ Bulletin for International Taxation, vol. 73, no. 4.