Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ambitious or Ambiguous? The Implications of Smart Specialisation for Core-Periphery Relations in Estonia and Slovakia Cover

Ambitious or Ambiguous? The Implications of Smart Specialisation for Core-Periphery Relations in Estonia and Slovakia

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Avdikos, V. & Chardas, A. (2016), ‘European Union Cohesion Policy post 2014: more (place-based and conditional) growth – less redistribution and cohesion,’ Territory, Politics, Governance, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2014.99246010.1080/21622671.2014.992460
  2. Bachtler, J.; Mendez, C. & Wishlade, F. (2019), Reforming the MFF and Cohesion Policy 2021–27: Pragmatic Drift or Paradigmatic Shift? European Policy Research Paper, no. 107, Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing.
  3. Baláž, V.; Frank, K.; Ojala, T. (2018), RIO Country Report 2017: Slovak Republic, EUR 29181 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  4. Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for A Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent report, prepared at the request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy, Danuta Hübner, Brussels: European Commission.
  5. Berkowitz, P. (2018), ‘EU Budget for the future smart specialization: future perspectives,’ Presentation held on 22 October 2018 in Vilnius for DG Regional and Urban Policy of the European Commission.
  6. Bohle, D. & Greskovits, B. (2012), Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
  7. Charron, N. & Lapuente, V. (2018), Quality of Government in EU Regions: Spatial and Temporal Patterns, QoG Working Paper Series 2018:1, Gothenburg.
  8. CORDIS (2018), Horizon 2020 e-CORDA database. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/projects/en [accessed 11 Dec 2018]
  9. Dabrowski, M. (2014), ‘EU cohesion policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: insights from Central and Eastern Europe,’ European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977641348198310.1177/0969776413481983
  10. Ehrlich, K.; Kriszan, A. & Lang, T. (2012), ‘Urban development in Central and Eastern Europe – between peripheralization and centralization?’ disP – The Planning Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2012.72161110.1080/02513625.2012.721611
  11. ESI Funds Open Data Platform (2019). Retrieved from https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/ [accessed 15 Feb 2019]
  12. Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (2014), Estonian Entrepreneurship Growth Strategy 2014–2020, September 2013, Tallinn.
  13. Estonian Ministry Of Education And Research (2014), Estonian Research and Development and Innovation Strategy ‘Knowledge-based Estonia 2014–2020’, Riigi Teataja, Part 3, no. 2, January 29, Tallinn.
  14. European Commission (2018a), Mutual Learning Exercise Widening Participation and Strengthening Synergies: Summary Report, Horizon 2020 Policy Support facility. Prepared by Leon, G.; Guy, K.; Acheson, H.; Nauwelaers, C. & L. Tsipouri, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  15. European Commission (2018b), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument, COM/2018/375 final, 2018/0196 (COD).
  16. European Commission (2018c), European Innovation Scoreboard 2018, prepared by Hugo Hollanders and Nordine Es-Sadki, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
  17. European Commission (2018d), Country Report Slovakia 2018, Brussels.
  18. European Commission (2019a), Country Report Estonia 2019, Brussels.
  19. European Commission (2019b), Country Report Slovakia 2019, Brussels.
  20. Faragó, L. & Varró, K. (2016), ‘Shifts in EU Cohesion Policy and processes of peripheralization: a view from Central Eastern Europe,’ European Spatial Research and Policy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/esrp-2016-000110.1515/esrp-2016-0001
  21. Ferry, M. & McMaster, I. (2013), ‘Cohesion policy and the evolution of regional policy in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1502–1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.83296910.1080/09668136.2013.832969
  22. Foray, D.; David P. A. & Hall, B. (2009), ‘Smart specialisation – the concept,’ in Knowledge for Growth: Prospects for Science, Technology and Innovation, BrusselsÖ European Commission, pp. 20–24.
  23. Foray, D.; Goddard, J.; Goenaga Beldarrain, X.; Landabaso, M.; McCann, P.; Morgan, K.; Nauwelaers, C. & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2012), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS 3), Smart Specialisation Platform, Seville: IPTS.
  24. Friedmann, J. (1973), ‘A theory of polarized development,’ in J. Friedmann (ed.) Urbanization, Planning, and National Development, Beverly Hills, CAÖ Sage, pp. 41–67.
  25. Government of the Slovak Republic (2013), Through Knowledge Towards Prosperity. Research and Innovation Strategy of the Slovak Republic.
  26. Iammarino, S.; Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Storper, M. (2017), Why Regional Development Matters for Europe’s Economic Future, Working Paper, no. 07/2017, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  27. Kah, S. (2014), Slovakia Case Study Report, GRINCOH Working Paper, no. 8.03.06.
  28. Karo, E. & Kattel, R. (2015), ‘Economic development and evolving state capacities in Central and Eastern Europe: can “smart specialization” make a difference?’ Journal of Economic Policy Reform, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.100906810.1080/17487870.2015.1009068
  29. Kattel, R. & Stamenov, B. (2018), RIO Country Report 2017: Estonia, EUR 29153 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  30. Kroll, H. (2015), ‘Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice – leading unlike horses to the water,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2079–2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.100303610.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
  31. Krugman, P. (1991), Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge and Leuven University Press
  32. Kühn, M. (2014), ‘Peripheralization: theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.86251810.1080/09654313.2013.862518
  33. Lang, T. (2011), ‘Regional development issues in Central and Eastern Europe: shifting research agendas from a focus on peripheries to peripheralisation?’ in A. Eröss & D. Karacsonyi (eds.) Geography in Visegrad and Neighbour Countries, Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences Geographical Research Institute, pp. 57–64.
  34. Lang, T & Görmar, F., eds. (2019), Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation. New Geographies of Europe, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1190-110.1007/978-981-13-1190-1
  35. Loewen, B. (2018), ‘From decentralization to re-centralization: Tendencies of regional policy and inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Halduskultuur – Administrative Culture, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 103–126. https://doi.org/10.32994/ac.v18i2.16210.32994/ac.v18i2.162
  36. Magone, J. M.; Laffan, B. & Schweiger, C., eds. (2016), Core-Periphery Relations in the European Union: Power and Conflict in a Dualist Political Economy, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315712994
  37. Matusiak, M. & Kleibrink, A., eds. (2018), Supporting an Innovation Agenda for the Western Balkans: Tools and Methodologies, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131571299410.4324/9781315712994
  38. McCann, P. & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2016), ‘The early experience of smart specialization implementation in EU cohesion policy,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1407–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.116617710.1080/09654313.2016.1166177
  39. Medve-Bálint, G. & Bohle, D. (2016), More Integrated but Also More Divided: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Foreign Direct Investment and the Cohesion Policy in Eastern Europe, MAXCAP Working Paper, no. 34 (September).
  40. Meliciani, V. (2015), Regional Disparities in the Enlarged European Union: Geography, Innovation and Structural Change, Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131581513810.4324/9781315815138
  41. Mendez, C. (2013), ‘The post-2013 reform of EU cohesion policy and the place-based narrative,’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.73673310.1080/13501763.2012.736733
  42. Muscio, A.; Reid, A. & Rivera Leon, L. (2015), ‘An empirical test of the regional innovation paradox: can smart specialisation overcome the paradox in Central and Eastern Europe?’ Journal of Economic Policy Reform, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.101354510.1080/17487870.2015.1013545
  43. OECD (2018), OECD Regional Statistics (database). https://doi.org/10.1787/region-data-en10.1787/region-data-en
  44. Prause, G. (2014), ‘Smart specialization and EU Eastern Innovation Cooperation,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 4, no. 1(16), pp. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-000110.2478/bjes-2014-0001
  45. Pugh, R. (2017), ‘Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions,’ Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 2018, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/239965441771706910.1177/2399654417717069
  46. Raagmaa, G.; Kalvet, T. & Kasesalu, R. (2013), ‘Europeanization and de-Europeanization of Estonian regional policy,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.77275410.1080/09654313.2013.772754
  47. Radosevic, S. & Ciampi Stancova, K. (2018), ‘Internationalising smart specialisation: assessment and issues in the case of EU new Member States,’ Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0339-310.1007/s13132-015-0339-3
  48. Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2014), Leveraging Research, Science and Innovation to Strengthen Social and Regional Cohesion, Policy Paper by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE), Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  49. Smetkowski, M. (2018), ‘The role of exogenous and endogenous factors in the growth of regions in Central and Eastern Europe: the metropolitan/non-metropolitan divide in the pre- and post-crisis era,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.136158510.1080/09654313.2017.1361585
  50. Suurna, M. & Kattel, R. (2010), ‘Europeanization of innovation policy in Central and Eastern Europe,’ Science and Public Policy, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 646–664. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X1277811826445910.3152/030234210X12778118264459
  51. Tiits, M.; Kalvet, T. & Mürk I. (2014), Reform of Higher Educational Systems in CEECs and the Effectiveness of Its Link with R&D Policy with the View to Smart Specialisation, GRINCOH Working Paper, no. 4.10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0037 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 71
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Sebastian Schulz, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.