Have a personal or library account? Click to login
European Affiliations or National Interests? Analyses of Voting Patterns on Trade Policy in European Parliament Cover

European Affiliations or National Interests? Analyses of Voting Patterns on Trade Policy in European Parliament

By: Yoo-Duk Kang  
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. ACEA (2009), ‘European automobile industry requests EU to suspend trade negotiations with South Korea,’ ACEA Press Release, 5 February.
  2. Attinà, F. (1990), ‘The voting behaviour of the European Parliament members and the problem of Europarties,’ European Journal of Political Research, no. 18. pp. 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00248.x10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00248.x
  3. Baldwin, R. E. & Magee, C. S. (2000), Congressional Trade Votes: From NAFTA Approval to Fast-Track Defeat, Policy Analyses in International Economics no. 59, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
  4. Brzinski, J. B. (1995), ‘Political group cohesion in the European Parliament, 1989–1994,’ in C. Rhodes & S. Mazey (eds.) The State of the European Union, vol. 3, London: Longman.10.1515/9781685857943-008
  5. European Commission (2006), Global Europe: Competing in the World, COM(2006) 567 final, 4.10.2006.
  6. European Parliament (2013), The European Parliament: Electoral Procedures, Fact Sheets on the European Union - 2013, Brussels: European Parliament.
  7. Héritier, A.; Moury, C.; Schoeller, M.; Meissner, K. & Mota, I. (2015), The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation, Brussels: European Parliament.
  8. Hiscox, M. J. (2002), ‘Commerce, coalition, and factor mobility: evidence from congressional votes on trade legislation,’ The American Political Science Review, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540200035710.1017/S0003055402000357
  9. Hix, S. (2000), How MEPs Vote, ESRC One Europe or Several? Programme Briefing Note 1/00, Falmer: University of Sussex.
  10. Hix, S. (2001), ‘Legislative behaviour and party competition in the European Parliament: an application of nominate to the EU,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.0032610.1111/1468-5965.00326
  11. Hix, S. (2002), ‘Parliamentary behavior with two principals: preferences, parties and voting in the European Parliament,’ American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 688–698. https://doi.org/10.2307/308840810.2307/3088408
  12. Hix, S. & Høyland, B. (2013), ‘Empowerment of the European Parliament,’ Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 16, pp. 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpolisci-032311-11073510.1146/annurevpolisci-032311-110735
  13. Hix, S. & Lord, C. (1997), Political Parties in the European Union, London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25560-310.1007/978-1-349-25560-3
  14. Hix, S. & Noury, A. (2009a), ‘After enlargement: voting patterns in the Sixth European Parliament,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 159–174. https://doi.org/10.3162/03629800978831428210.3162/036298009788314282
  15. Hix, S. & Noury, A. (2009b), ‘Voting patterns and alliance formation in the European Parliament,’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, no. 364, pp. 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.026310.1098/rstb.2008.0263268971419073477
  16. Hix, S.; Noury, A. & Roland, G. (2007), Democratic Politics in the European Parliament, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051149195510.1017/CBO9780511491955
  17. Krajewski, M. (2005), ‘External trade law and the Constitution Treaty: towards a federal and more democratic common commercial policy?’ Common Market Law Review, no. 1, pp. 91–127.10.54648/COLA2004070
  18. Lim, H. & Sung, H. (2011), ‘Empirical analyses of U.S. congressional voting on recent FTA,’ The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.236310.2202/1935-1682.2363
  19. Noury, A. G. & Roland, G. (2002), ‘European Parliament: Should it have more power?’ Economy Policy, vol. 17, no. 35, pp. 279–319.10.1111/1468-0327.t01-1-00090
  20. Van den Putte, L.; De Ville, F. & Orbie, J. (2014), The European Parliament’s New Role in Trade Policy: Turning Power into Impact, CEPS Special Report, no. 89. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/51025/1/CEPS_SR_89_EP_New_Role_in_EU_Trade_Policy.pdf [accessed Sep 2019]
  21. Raunio, T. (1997), The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989–1994 European Parliament, London: Ashgate.
  22. Reichert, T. (2004), ‘EU trade policy decision making and WWF’s trade policy work in Brussels,’ Paper presented at seminar ‘The Relationship between MEAs and WTO Rules’, Szentendre (10 May 2004).
  23. Ringe, N. (2010), Who Decides, and How? Preferences, Uncertainty, and Policy Choice in the European Parliament, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572557.003.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572557.003.0001
  24. VoteWatch (2010), Voting Behaviour in the New European Parliament: The First Year, Annual Report 2010.
  25. Wolfstädter, L.; Becker, S. & Kreilinger, V. (2018), Rights and Role of the European Parliament in Common Commercial Policy, Policy Paper no. 215, Jacques Delors Institut.
  26. Woolcock, S. (2007), European Union Policy towards Free Trade Agreements, ECIPE Working Paper no. 03/2007.
  27. Xie, T. (2006), ‘Congressional roll call voting on China trade policy,’ American Politics Research, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 732–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X0628916210.1177/1532673X06289162
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0036 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 48
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Yoo-Duk Kang, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.