Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of ECHR and the Case-Law of the ECtHR on the Development of the Right to Legal Assistance in International Criminal Courts (ICTY, ICTR, ICC) Cover

The Impact of ECHR and the Case-Law of the ECtHR on the Development of the Right to Legal Assistance in International Criminal Courts (ICTY, ICTR, ICC)

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Amnesty International (2014), Fair Trial Manual, 2nd ed., London: Amnesty International.
  2. Assy, R. (2015), Injustice in Person: The Right to Self-representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687442.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687442.001.0001
  3. Bezek v. Germany [2015], ECtHR, 4211/12 and 5850/12, 21.04.2015. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154555 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  4. Bingham, L. (2006), ‘Strategy or process? Closing the international criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda,’ Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 687–717.
  5. Croissant v. Germany [1992], ECtHR, no. 13611/88, 25.9.1992. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57736 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  6. Cryer, R.; Friman, H.; Robinson, D. & Wilmshurst, E. (2010), An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051176080810.1017/CBO9780511760808
  7. European Commission of Human Rights (1956), Document DH(56)11 CDH(68)3 prepared by Preparatory Work on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (1956). Information Document prepared by the Secretariat of the European Commission of Human Rights. Doc. DH(56)11 CDH(68)3, 8.10.1956. Retrieved from http://www.echr.coe.int/LibraryDocs/Travaux/ECHRTravaux-ART6-DH(56)11-EN1338886.PDf [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  8. European Convention on Human Rights (1950), 4.11.1950. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  9. Fellman, D. (1977), The Defendant’s Rights Today, London & Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  10. General Assembly Resolution A/47/10(1993), adopted by the General Assembly (on the report of Sixth Committee (A/47/586), 9 February 1993. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/47/34 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  11. Gillespie, A. & Weare S. (2017), The English Legal System, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198785439.001.000110.1093/he/9780198785439.001.0001
  12. Grover, L. (2014), Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978110770558610.1017/CBO9781107705586
  13. Gutnyk, V. (2015), ‘The requirements for qualification of defence counsel in the international criminal courts and tribunals,’ Teisė, vol. 95, pp. 182–192. https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2015.95.748110.15388/Teise.2015.95.7481
  14. Josipovic, I. (2006), ‘Responsibility for war crimes before national courts in Croatia,’ International Review of the Red Cross, vol. 88, no. 861, pp. 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638310600009910.1017/S1816383106000099
  15. Kremens, K. (2011), ‘The protection of the accused in international criminal law according to the human rights law standard,’ Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, vol. 1, pp. 26–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2013-002610.2478/wrlae-2013-0026
  16. Lagerblom v. Sweden [2003], ECtHR, 26891/95, 14.1.2003. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60884 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  17. Leaney, E. (2008), ‘Assignment of counsel of choice to indigent accused at the ICTR: an analysis of a threat to fair trial rights and what may be done about it,’ New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, vol. 6, pp. 239–272.
  18. MacDonald, G. K. & Swaak-Goldman, O. Q. (2000), Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law. Volume 1: Commentary, Hague: BRILL.10.1163/9789004507876
  19. Marasinghe, С. (1995), ‘The right to legal assistance in international law, with special reference to the ICCPR, the ECHR, and the ACHR,’ Asian Yearbook of International Law, vol. 5, pp. 15–44.10.1163/9789004400641_005
  20. Meisenberg, S. M. (2007), ‘The right to legal assistance at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: a review of its jurisprudence,’ in E. Decaux, A. Dieng & M. Sow (eds.) From Human Rights to International Criminal Law: Studies in Honour of an African Jurist, the Late Judge Laïty Kama, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160552.i-776.3010.1163/ej.9789004160552.i-776.30
  21. Mugwanya, G. (2000), ‘Realizing universal human rights norms through regional human rights mechanisms: reinvigorating the African system,’ Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, vol. 10, pp. 35–50. https://doi.org/10.18060/1752710.18060/17527
  22. Prosecutor v. J. B. Barayagwiza [1999], ICTR, no. ICTR-97-19 (Appeals Chamber Decision), 3.11.1999. Retrieved from http://www.unictr.org/Portals/0/Case/English/Barayagwiza/decisions/dcs991103.pdf [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
  23. Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana, Hassan Ngeze and Jean Bosco Barayagwiza [2003], Decision on the motion to stay the proceedings in the trial of Ferdinand Nahimana, ICTR, no. ICTR-99-52-T, 5.6.2003. Retrieved from https://jrad.irmct.org/view.htm?r=216405&s= [accessed 25 Aug 2019]
  24. Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean Bosco Barayagwiza and Hassan Ngeze [2007], Judgement, ICTR, no. ICTR-99-52-Am, 28.11.2007. Retrieved from https://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-99-52/appeals-chamber-judgements/en/071128.pdf [accessed 25 Aug 2019]
  25. Prosecutor v. J. Prlic, B. Stojic, S. Praljak, M. Petkovic, V. Coric, B. Pusic [2006], Decision On Assignment Of Defence Counsel, para. 10, ICTY, no. IT-04-74-PT, 15.12.2006. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/cases/prlic/tdec/en/060215.htm [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
  26. Prosecutor v. S. Milosevic [2004], Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s Decision on the Assignment of Defense Counsel, ICTY, no. IT-02-54-AR73.7, 1.11.2004. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/cases/slobodan_milosevic/acdec/en/041101.htm [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
  27. Prosecutor v. Phénéas Munyarugarama [2012], Decision on the prosecutor’s request for referral of the cases to the Republic of Rwanda, ICTR, no. ICTR-02-79-R11bis, 28.6.2012. Retrieved from http://w.unictr.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-02-79-r11bis/trial-decisions/en/120628.pdf [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
  28. Prosecutor v. V. Seselj [2003], Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Order Appointing Counsel to Assist Vojislav Seselj with his Defence, ICTY, no. IT-03-67-PT, 9.5.2003. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/cases/seselj/tdec/en/030509.htm [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
  29. Prosecutor v. Z. Tolimir, R. Miletic, M. Gvero [2005], Decision on Appointment of Co–counsel for Radivoje Miletic, ICTY, no. IT-05-88-PT, 28.12.2005. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/cases/popovic/tdec/en/050928.htm [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
  30. Sands, P. (2003), From Nuremberg to The Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051149408610.1017/CBO9780511494086
  31. Schabas, W. (2011), An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975035
  32. The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui [2012], Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, no. ICC-01/04-01/07, Decision on the implementation of Regulation 55 of the Regulations of the Court and severing the charges against the accused persons, 21 November. Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2012_10236.PDF [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
  33. The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo [2016], Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, no. ICC-01/04-01/06, Decision on the Request of the Defence for Thomas Lubanga Dyilo seeking his Appearance via Video-Link at the Hearings of 11, 13 and 14 October 2016, 6.10.2016. Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2017_04423.PDF [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
  34. UN (1993a), Letter dated 10 February 1993 from the Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, S/25266. Retrieved from http://repository.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/50551/S_25266-EN.pdf [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  35. UN (1993b), Letter dated 16 February 1993 from the Permanent Representative of Italy to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, S/25300. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/25300 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  36. UN (1993c), Report of the Secretary–General Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808 (1993), presented 3 May 1993 (S/25704). Retrieved from https://undocs.org/S/25704 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  37. UN (1994a), Draft commentary to Parts 4 and 5 of the Draft Statute, Report of the Working Group on a draft Statute for an International Criminal Court, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.491/Rev.2/Add.2, 18 July 1994. Retrieved from http://legal.un.org/docs/?symbol=A/CN.4/L.491/Rev.2/Add.2 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  38. UN (1994b), Preliminary report of the Independent Commission of Experts. Annex to Letter dated 1 October 1994 from the Secretary-General to the President of the Security Council, UN Doc. S/1994/11254 October. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/S/1994/1125 [accessed 23 Aug 2019]
  39. UN (1995), Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, UN Doc. A/50/22. Retrieved from https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/b50da8/pdf/ [accessed 25 Aug 2019]
  40. UN (1996), Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court (1996), UN Doc. A/51/22. Retrieved from https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/e75432/pdf/ [accessed 25 Aug 2019]
  41. UN (2019), International Tribunals. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/repertoire/international-tribunals [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  42. UN Security Council Resolution 808(1993), adopted by the Security Council on 22 February 1993. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/S/RES/808(1993) [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  43. UN Security Council Resolution 827(1993), adopted unanimously on 25 May 1993. UN Doc. S/RES/827(1993). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/827(1993) [accessed 23 Aug 2019]
  44. UN Security Council Resolution 955(1994), adopted on 8 November 1994. UN Doc. S/RES/955(1994). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/955(1994) [accessed 23 Aug 2019]
  45. Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (1993), UN. Doc. A/CONF.157/23. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Vienna.aspx [accessed 24 Aug 2019]
  46. Whiting, A. (2009), ‘In international criminal prosecutions, justice delayed can be justice delivered,’ Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 50, pp. 323–364.
  47. Wilner, G. (1995–1996), ‘Reflection of regional human rights law,’ Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 25, pp. 407–426.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 188 - 204
Published on: Dec 21, 2019
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Mykhailo Buromenskyi, Vitalii Gutnyk, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.