Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Violations of Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Religion by the Russian Federation as the Occupying Power in Crimea Cover

Violations of Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Religion by the Russian Federation as the Occupying Power in Crimea

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Ambrosio, T. (2016), ‘The rhetoric of irredentism: the Russian Federation’s perception management campaign and the annexation of Crimea,’ Small Wars & Surgencies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2016.115165310.1080/09592318.2016.1151653
  2. Babin, B. (2014), ‘Rights and dignity of indigenous peoples of Ukraine in revolutionary conditions and foreign occupation,’ Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 81–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2014.102408010.1080/10611959.2014.1024080
  3. Bowring, B. (2018), ‘Who are the “Crimea people” or “people of Crimea”? The fate of the Crimean Tatars, Russia’s legal justification for annexation, and Pandora’s Box,’ in S. Sayapin & E. Tsybulenko, E. (eds.) The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 21–40.
  4. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (2014), International Religious Freedom Report: Ukraine (Crimea), Washington, DC: United States Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.
  5. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (2018), Human Rights Report: Ukraine (Crimea), Washington, DC: United States Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.
  6. Censor.Net (2019a), ‘Last year due to the actions of occupying regime in Crimea six people had died and one had disappeared,’ 23 January.
  7. Censor.Net (2019b), ‘“The case against me is not closed and there is a danger of persecution,” Archbishop Klyment,’ 3 March.
  8. Censor.Net (2019c), ‘Censor.Net and 11 more Ukrainian websites are blocked by all providers in Crimea,’ 6 April.
  9. Cooper, T. (2016), ‘Crimean Tatar elected body banned in Russia,’ Human Rights Watch, 29 September.
  10. Council of Europe (1988), Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights) as amended by Protocol No. 11. Council of Europe Treaty Series 155, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  11. Financial Times (2018), ‘Ukrainian Church splits from Moscow,’ 15 December.
  12. Gorbunova, Y. (2015), ‘Dispatches: Crimean Tatar TV station forced to close,’ Human Rights Watch, 1 April.
  13. Grant, T. D. (2015), ‘Annexation of Crimea,’ American Journal of International law, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 68–95. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.1.006810.5305/amerjintelaw.109.1.0068
  14. Human Rights Information Centre (2017), ‘44 people disappeared in Crime after annexation,’ 31 August.
  15. Human Rights Watch (2017a), ‘Crimea: Ungrounded conviction of a Crimean Tatar leader’, 12 September.
  16. Human Rights Watch (2017b), ‘Crimea: Persecution of Crimean Tatars intensifies,’ 14 November.
  17. ICC (2018), Report on Preliminary Examination Activities, The Hague: International Criminal Court.
  18. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), United Nations General Assembly, New York.
  19. Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group (2019a), ‘Ukrainian political prisoners in Russia & occupied Crimea jailed for much longer than murderers,’ 8 February.
  20. Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group (2019b), ‘Russia moves political prisoner Balukh from Crimea in new revenge for Ukrainian Flag,’ 21 February.
  21. Krym.Realii (2019), ‘Russian authorities have detained Archbishop of Ukrainian Orthodox Church Klyment in Simferopol,’ 3 March.
  22. Lankina, T. & Watanabe, K. (2017), “Russian Spring’ or ‘Spring Betrayal’? The media as a mirror of Putin’s evolving strategy in Ukraine,’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 1526–1556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.139760310.1080/09668136.2017.1397603
  23. Law of Ukraine no. 1207-VII of 15 April 2014 ‘On securing the rights and freedoms of citizens and the legal regime on the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine’ with changes set forth by the Law No 1237-VII of 6 May 2014 (2014), Verkhovna Rada, Government of Ukraine.
  24. Mejias, U. A. & Vokuev, N. E. (2017), ‘Disinformation and the media: the case of Russia and Ukraine,’ Media, Culture & Society, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371668667210.1177/0163443716686672
  25. Merezhko, O. (2018), ‘International legal aspects of Russia’s war against Ukraine in Eastern Ukraine,’ in S. Sayapin & E. Tsybulenko (eds.) The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_510.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_5
  26. OHCHR (2018), Situation of Human Rights in the Temporarily Occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol (Ukraine), Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
  27. OSCE (2017), Minsk Declaration and Resolutions adopted by the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly at the twenty-sixth annual session, Minsk: Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
  28. PACE (2016), Legal Remedies for Human Rights Violations on the Ukrainian Territories Outside the Control of the Ukrainian Authorities, Strasbourg: Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
  29. PACE (2018), Humanitarian Consequences of the War in Ukraine, Strasbourg: Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.
  30. QHA Media (2019), ‘Prosecutor’s office of the autonomous republic of Crimea put 28 participants of Crimean “self-defense” on wanted list,’ 19 March.
  31. Resolution A/RES/72/190: Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, A/RES/72/190, UN General Assembly, 19.12.2017. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/72/190 [accessed 13 Apr 2019]
  32. Resolution A/RES/73/194 Problem of the militarization of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, as well as parts of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, A/RES/73/194, UN General Assembly, 5.12.2018. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/A/73/L.47 [accessed 13 Apr 2019]
  33. Sayapin, S. (2018), ‘An alleged “genocide of Russian-speaking persons” in Eastern Ukraine: some observations on the “hybrid” application of international criminal law by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation,’ in S. Sayapin & E. Tsybulenko (eds.) The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_1510.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_15
  34. Tsybulenko, E. & Francis, J. A. (2018), ‘Separatists or Russian troops and local collaborators? Russian aggression in Ukraine: the problem of definitions,’ in S. Sayapin & E. Tsybulenko (eds.) The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_610.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_6
  35. Tsybulenko, E. & Kelichavyi, B. (2018), ‘International legal dimensions of the Russian occupation of Crimea,’ in S. Sayapin & E. Tsybulenko (eds.) The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_1310.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_13
  36. UHHRU (2016), Human Rights Situation on the Occupied Territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol, Helsinki: Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union.
  37. UHHRU (2017), ‘General Prosecutor of Ukraine: Achievements of the Prosecutor’s Office of Crimea in gathering evidence of war crimes in the occupied peninsula are based on cooperation with non-governmental human rights organizations,’ Helsinki: Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union.
  38. UNIAN (2019), ‘Ukraine’s SBU chief: over 130 Crimean Tatars persecuted by Russia’s FSB since occupation of Crimea,’ 18 February.
  39. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), United Nations General Assembly, New York.
  40. Valich, J. & Hamulak, O. (2018), ‘Cyber operations during the conflict in Ukraine and the role of international law,’ in S. Sayapin & E. Tsybulenko (eds.) The Use of Force against Ukraine and International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_1010.1007/978-94-6265-222-4_10
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0026 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 134 - 147
Published on: Dec 21, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Evhen Tsybulenko, Anastassiya Platonova, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.