Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. ASEM (1996), Chairman’s Statement of the First Asia–Europe Meeting, Bangkok, 1–2 March. Retrieved from http://www.aseminfoboard.org/sites/default/files/documents/1996%20-%20ASEM1%20-%20Chair%20Statement.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]
  2. ASEM (1998), Chairman’s Statement of the Second Asia–Europe Meeting, London, 3–4 April. Retrieved from http://www.aseminfoboard.org/sites/default/files/documents/1998%20-%20ASEM2%20-%20Chair%20Statement.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]
  3. CAEC (1997), The Rationale and Common Agenda for Asia–Europe Cooperation, CAEC Task Force Reports, London: Council for Asia–Europe Cooperation.
  4. Cammack, P. (1999), ‘Interpreting ASEM: Interregionalism and new materialism,’ Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354786990872466810.1080/13547869908724668
  5. Camroux, D. & Lechervy, C. (1996), ‘‘Close Encounter of a Third Kind?’ The Inaugural Asia-Europe meeting of March 1996,’ The Pacific Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274960871919610.1080/09512749608719196
  6. Communication from the Commission (COM (1994) 314 final) to the Council Towards a New Asia Strategy, Brussels, 13.07.1994. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/2949/1/2949.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]
  7. Crawford, J. A. & Fiorentino, R. V. (2005), The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements, Discussion Paper, no. 8, Geneva: WTO Secretariat.
  8. Dent, C. M. (1999), ‘The EU–East Asia economic relationship: the persisting weak triadic link?’ European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 371–394.10.54648/EERR1999037
  9. Doidge, M. (2011), The European Union and Interregionalism: Patterns of Engagement, Farnham: Ashgate.
  10. Doidge, M. (2013), ‘New Zealand and the Asia-Europe Meeting,’ Asia Europe Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-013-0347-510.1007/s10308-013-0347-5
  11. European Council (1995), ‘Madrid European Council: Conclusions of the Presidency,’ Bulletin of the European Union, no. 12, pp. 9–51.
  12. EUROSTAT (2001), ‘Intra-EU investment increased by 50% in 2000,’ News Release, no. 74/2001, 6 July.
  13. Forster, A. (1999), ‘The European Union in South-East Asia: continuity and change in turbulent times,’ International Affairs, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.0010610.1111/1468-2346.00106
  14. Hänggi, H. (1999), ‘ASEM and the construction of the new triad,’ Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354786990872467010.1080/13547869908724670
  15. Hänggi, H. (2003), ‘Regionalism through interregionalism: East Asia and ASEM,’ in L. Fu-Kuo & P. Régnier (eds.) Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting? London: Routledge, pp. 197–219.
  16. Hänggi, H. (2006), ‘Interregionalism as a multifaceted phenomenon: in search of a typology,’ in H. Hänggi, R. Roloff & J. Rüland (eds.) Interregionalism and International Relations, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 31–62.
  17. Maitland, D. & Hu, Y. S. (1998), Europe and Emerging Asia, London: Federal Trust.
  18. Pou Serradell, V. (1996), ‘The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): a historical turning point in relations between the two regions,’ European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 185–210.10.54648/EERR1996013
  19. Ruigrok, W. & van Tulder, R. (1995), The Logic of International Restructuring, London: Routledge.
  20. Rüland, J. (1999), Transregional Relations: The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) – A Functional Analysis, Paper presented to the International Conference on Asia and Europe on the Eve of the 21st Century, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 19–20 August.
  21. Stubbs, R. (2002), ‘ASEAN Plus Three: emerging East Asian regionalism?’ Asian Survey, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2002.42.3.44010.1525/as.2002.42.3.440
  22. The World Bank (2005), Global Economic Prospects: Trade, Regionalism, and Development, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  23. Wendt, A. (1994), ‘Collective identity formation and the international state,’ American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 384–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/294471110.2307/2944711
  24. Yeo, L. H. (2003), Asia and Europe: The Development and Different Dimensions of ASEM, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020360999610.4324/9780203609996
  25. Yeung, M. T.; Perdikis, N. & Kerr, W. A. (1999), Regional Trading Blocs in the Global Economy: The EU and ASEAN, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 19
Published on: Nov 7, 2019
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Mathew Doidge, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.