Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fragments of Europeanization of Georgian Property Law and Law of Obligations in the Context of Reception of German Law Cover

Fragments of Europeanization of Georgian Property Law and Law of Obligations in the Context of Reception of German Law

Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part and Georgia, of the other part, 27.06.14, date of publication 11.09.14, temporary application mode 01.09.14, date of full entry into force 01.04.16, OJ L261/4, 30.08.2014.
  2. Barker, K. & Jensen, D., eds. (2013), Private Law: Key Encounters with Public Law, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139856478
  3. Basedow, J. (2005), ‘Towards a universal doctrine of breach of contract: the impact of the CISG,’ International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 25, pp. 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2006.02.00910.1016/j.irle.2006.02.009
  4. Bassenge, P.et al., eds. (2019), Palandt Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 78. Auflage, München: Verlag C. H. Beck.
  5. Principles of European Contract Law (2002), Parts I and II – Revised 1998, Part III, pp. xxi–xxii.
  6. Berger, K. P. (2001), ‘Principles of European Contract Law and the Concept of the Creeping Codification of Law,’ European Review of Private Law, vol. 1, pp. 21–34.10.1023/A:1011290501101
  7. Berger, K. P. (2010), The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoria, 2nd revised ed., Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  8. Brunner, Ch. (2009), Force Majeure and Hardship under General Contract Principles: Exemption for Non-performance in International Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International BV.
  9. Bueno Diaz, O. (2008), Franchising in European Contract Law, Schriften zur Europäischer Rechtswissenschaft, vol. 8, Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers.
  10. Burduli, I. (2018), ‘Nekrorezeption in Transformationsgesellschaftenin,’ in M. Brinkmann, B. Völzmann-Stickelbrock & D. O. Effer-Uhe (eds.) Dogmatik im Dienst von Gerechtigkeit, Rechtssicherheit und Rechtsentwicklung: Festschrift für Hanns Prütting, Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, pp. 3–15.
  11. Chachava, S. (2004), ‘Retrieval of property from illegal possession,’ [in Georgian] Georgian Law Review, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 760–782.
  12. Chanturia, L.; Zoidze, B.; Ninidze, T.; Shengelia, R. & Khetsuriani, J., eds. (2001), Commentary on Georgian Civil Code, Book III: Law of Obligations, General Part, [in Georgian] Tbilisi: Publishing House “Samartali”.
  13. Chechelashvili, Z. (2006), Property Law, [in Georgian] Tbilisi.
  14. Chen-Wishart, M.; Loke, A. & Ong, B. (2016), Remedies for Breach of Contract, Studies in the Contract Law of Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Online.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757221.001.0001
  15. Chochia, A. (2013), Models of European Integration: Georgia’s Economic and Political Transition, Dissertation Thesis, TUT Press.
  16. Chochia, A. & Popjanevski, J. (2016), ‘Change of power and its influence on country’s Europeanization process. Case study: Georgia,’ in T. Kerikmäe & A. Chochia (eds.) Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_1310.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_13
  17. Ciematniece, I. (2010), Contract Renegotiation and Adaptation, Concept of Contract Renegotiation and Adaptation in International Commercial Law Contracts, Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
  18. Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia, No. 3K-624-02, 09.09.2002.
  19. DiMatteo, L. A.; Zhou Q.; Saintier, S. & Rowley, K. (2013), Commercial Contract Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978113923566210.1017/CBO9781139235662
  20. Dzneladze, N. (2007), ‘Legal challenges of retrieval of property from illegal possession and property of property right,’ [in Georgian] Martlmsajuleba [Justice], no. 2.
  21. Friedmann, D. (1995), ‘The performance interest in contract damages,’ Law Quarterly Review, vol. 111, pp. 628–654.
  22. Gegenava, D., ed. (2013), ‘Preface,’ [in Georgian] Collection of Articles Lado Chanturia 50: Anniversary Edition, Tbilisi: Davit Batonishvili Law Institute, p. 5.
  23. German Civil Code (2005), Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Bundesministerium der Justiz, Saarbrücken: Juris GmbH.
  24. Gesetz zur Modernisierung des Sculdrechts, Vom 26.11.2001, verkündet in Jahrgang 2001 Nr. 61 vom 29.11.2001.
  25. Hesselink, M. (2010), Scope and Content of an Optional Instrument for EU Contract Law, Briefing Paper for the European Parliament Interparliamentary Committee Meeting on an Optional Instrument for EU Contract Law.
  26. Joerges, C. (2005), ‘Europeanization as process: thoughts on the Europeanization of private law,’ European Public Law, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–84.10.54648/EURO2005007
  27. Jugheli, G.et al., ed. (2014), Contract Law, [in Georgian] Tbilisi: Meridiani.
  28. Keirse, A. L. M. (2011), ‘European impact on contract law: a perspective on the interlinked contributions of legal scholars, legislators and courts to the Europeanization of contract law,’ Utrecht Law Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–42. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.14510.18352/ulr.145
  29. Kreitner D. (2005), ‘Multiplicity in contract remedies,’ in N. Cohen & E. McKendrick (eds.) Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract, Portland, OR: Hart Pub lish ing, pp. 19–50.
  30. Kropholler, J. (2014), German Civil Code, Study Comments, [in Georgian] Tbilisi.
  31. Kurzynsky-Singer, E. & Zarandia, T. (2014), ‘Rezeption des deutschen Sachenrechts in Georgien,’ in E: Krzynsky-Singer (ed.) Transformation durch Rezeption?’ Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, vol. 102, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-153320-410.1628/978-3-16-153320-4
  32. Lando, O. (1974), ‘The EC draft convention on the law applicable to contractual and non-contractual obligations,’ Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 6–55.
  33. Lando, O. (2008), ‘Optional or mandatory Europeanisation of contract law,’ European Review of Private Law, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–69.10.1023/A:1008779604431
  34. Lando, O. & Beale, H. (2000), Principles of European Contract Law, Part I, II, The Hague, London & Boston: Kluwer Law International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-575-9_2410.1007/978-90-6704-575-9_24
  35. Letto-Vanamo, P. & J. Smits, J., eds. (2012), Coherence and Fragmentation in European Private Law, Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers.10.1515/9783866539655
  36. Löwisch, M. (2003), ‘New law of obligations in Germany,’ Ritsumeikan Law Review, no. 20, pp. 141–156.
  37. Markesinis, S. B.; Unberath, H. & Johnston, A. (2006), The German Law of Contract – A Comparative Treatise, 2nd ed., Oxford & Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
  38. Mátyás, I. (2008), ‘Current issues in the unification of European contract law,’ European Integration Studies, Miskolc, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63–73.
  39. Miller, L. (2011), The Emerge of EU Contract Law – Exploring Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606627.003.000710.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606627.003.0007
  40. Paul, B. S. (1999), The Futility of Unification and Harmonization in International Commercial Law, University of Virginia School of Law, Legal Studies, Working Paper, no. 99-10.
  41. Putkaradze, I. (2001), ‘Gratuitous contracts in Georgian law,’ [in Georgian] Georgian Law Review, no. 2, pp. 17–25.
  42. Riesenfeld, S. (1993), ‘The impact of German legal ideas and institutions on legal thought and institutions in the United States,’ in M. Reimann (ed.) The Reception of Continental Ideas in the Common Law World 1820–1920, vol. 13, Berlin: Suncker & Humbolt, Berlin, pp. 89–98.
  43. Ripstein, A. (2009), Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674054516
  44. Rosett, A. (1992), ‘Unification, harmonization, restatement, codification, and reform in international commercial law,’ American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 683–697. https://doi.org/10.2307/8405910.2307/84059
  45. Rowan, S. (2012), Remedies for Breach of Contract, a Comparative Analysis of the Protection of Performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606603.003.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606603.003.0001
  46. Smits, J. (2012), ‘Coherence and fragmentation in the law of contract,’ in P. Letto-Vanamo & J. Smits (eds.) Coherence and Fragmentation in European Private Law, Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers, pp. 9–24.10.1515/9783866539655.9
  47. Surguladze, Iv. (2002), Contract and Law, [in Georgian] translated from German and introduction by O. Gamkrelidze, Tbilisi.
  48. Zoidze, B. (2003), ‘From the history of creation of Georgian civil code,’ [in Georgian] Georgian Law Review, vol. 6/2003, no. 1.
  49. Troitiño, D. R. & Chochia A. (2011), ‘Georgia and the European Union from the Mediterranean Perspective,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 2, no. 1(11), pp. 81–102.
  50. Twigg-Flesner, C. (2013), The Europeanisation of Contract Law: Current Controversies in Law, 2nd ed., London & New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020354937710.4324/9780203549377
  51. UN (2010), United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1980, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, New York: United Nations.
  52. UNIDROIT (2014), UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT Contract Principles or UPICC), Rome: International Institute for the Unification of Private Law.
  53. van Erp, S. (2012), ‘European property law: a new and rapidly developing area of research and teaching,’ European Property Law Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2012-000110.1515/eplj-2012-0001
  54. von Bar, C.et al., eds. (2009), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law, Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), Study Group on a European Civil Code and Research Group on EC Private Law (Acquis Group), Munich: Sellier. European Law Publishers GmbH.10.1515/9783866537279
  55. Wagner, G. (2002), ‘The economics of harmonization: the case of contract law,’ Common Market Law Review, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 995–1023. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102088421020510.1023/A:1020884210205
  56. Westermann, P. (2012), BGB – Sachenrecht, 12. Auflage, Heidelberg: C. F. Müller.
  57. Williston, S. & Lord, R. A. (1990), A Treatise on the Law of Contracts, 4th ed., Eagan, MN: West Group.
  58. Wolf, M. & Wellenhofer, M. (2016), Sachenrecht, 31. Auflage, Köln: C. H. Beck.
  59. Zarandia, T. (2007), ‘The national character of private law and the necessity of reception,’ [in Georgian] Guram Tavartkiladze Anniversary Collection, Tbilisi: TSUER, pp. 294–304.
  60. Zeller, B. (2007), CISG and Unification of International Trade Law, Abingdon & New York: Routledge-Cavendish. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020393288910.4324/9780203932889
  61. Zoidze, B. (2005), Reception of European Private Law in Georgia, [in Georgian] Tbilisi: Tinatin Tsereteli Institute of State and Law of the Academy of Science of Georgia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Language: English
Page range: 140 - 156
Published on: Jul 30, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Tamar Zarandia, Natia Chitashvili, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.