References
- A, B and C v. Latvia [2016], ECHR, no. 30808/11.
- Aksu v. Turkey [2012], ECHR, nos. 4149/04 and 41029/04.
- Al Nashiri v. Poland [2015], ECHR, no. 28761/11.
- Amann v. Switzerland [2000], ECHR, no. 27798/95.
- Avram and others v. Moldova [2011], ECHR, no. 41588/05.
- Beiker K. & Gippenreiter Iu. B. (1995), ‘The impact of Stalinist repressions of the late 1930s on the lives of three generations of families,’ Russian Education & Society, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 52–89. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393371052
- Bensaid v. the United Kingdom [2001], ECHR, no. 44599/98.
- Burinskaitė, K. & Okuličiūtė, L. (2011), KGB slaptieji archyvai 1954–1991 m., Vilnius: Lietuvos gyventojų genocido ir rezistencijos tyrimo centras.
- Campagnano v. Italy [2006], ECHR, no. 77955/01.
- Caparini, M. (2014), ‘Comparing the democratization of intelligence governance in East Central Europe and the Balkans,’ Intelligence and National Security, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 498–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2014.91517510.1080/02684527.2014.915175
- Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [2002], ECHR, no. 28957/95.
- Ciobanu, M. (2014), ‘Reconstructing the history of early Communism and armed resistance in Romania,’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1452–1481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.95644010.1080/09668136.2014.956440
- Ciubotaru v. Moldova [2010], ECHR, no. 27138/04.
- Commission on Human Rights (2006), Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: Study on the right to the truth, Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Symbol E/CN.4/2006/91. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=E/CN.4/2006/91 [accessed 23 Sep 2017]
- Connelly, A. M. (1986), ‘Problems of interpretation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights,’ International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 35, pp. 567–593. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/35.3.567
- Costa and Pavan v. Italy [2012], ECHR, no. 54270/10.
- Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom [1993], ECHR, no. 13134/87.
- Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [2015], ECHR, no. 40454/07.
- Council of Europe (2017a), ‘47 Member States.’ Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/47-members-states [accessed 23 Sep 2017]
- Council of Europe (2017b), Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 005: Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/005/signatures?p_auth=UEn4XKdj [accessed 23 Sep 2017]
- E.B. v. France [2008], ECHR, no. 43546/02.
- European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, Valstybės žinios, 2011, no. 156-7390.
- Evans v. the United Kingdom [2007], ECHR, no. 6339/05
- Fernández Martínez v. Spain [2014], ECHR [GC], no. 56030/07.
- Freeman, M. (2000-2002), ‘Transitional justice: fundamental goals and unavoidable complications,’ Manitoba Law Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 113–121.
- Gailienė, D. (2008), Ką jie mums padarė: Lietuvos gyvenimas traumų psichologijos žvilgsniu, Vilnius: Tyto alba. Gaskin v. The United Kingdom [1989], ECHR, no. 10454/83.
- Gauck, J. (2000), Štazi bylos: kraupus VDR palikimas, transl. from German by Sigitas Asinauskas, Vilnius: Lietuvos gyventojų genocido ir rezistencijos tyrimo centras.
- Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom [2010], ECHR, no. 4158/05.
- Glass v. the United Kingdom [2004], ECHR, no. 61827/00.
- Godelli v. Italy [2013], ECHR, no. 33783/09.
- Government Resolution no. 579 (2007), Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania no. 579, Valstybės žinios, 2007, no. 68-2667 as amended by Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania no. 6, Valstybės žinios, 2013, no. 4-105.
- Gough v. the United Kingdom [2015], ECHR, no. 49327/11.
- Gross v. Switzerland [2013], ECHR, no. 67810/10.
- Gruodytė, E. & Gervienė, S. (2015), ‘Access to archives in the post-Communist countries: the victim’s perspective,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 5, no. 2 (19), pp. 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2015-001810.1515/bjes-2015-0018
- Guerra and others v. Italy [1998], ECHR [GC], no. 14967/89. Haas v. Switzerland [2011], ECHR, no. 31322/07.
- Hamber, B. (2006), ‘Narrowing the micro and macro: a psychological perspective on reparations in societies in transition,’ in P. de Greiff (ed.) The Handbook of Reparations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 560–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199291926.003.001710.1093/0199291926.003.0017
- Horne, C. M. (2014), ‘Lustration, transitional justice, and social trust in post-Communist countries. Repairing or wresting the ties that bind?’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 225–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.88262010.1080/09668136.2014.882620
- I. v. the United Kingdom [2002], ECHR, no. 25680/94.
- İhsan Ay v. Turkey [2014], ECHR, no. 34288/04.
- Katamidze, V. I. (2007), Loyal Comrades, Ruthless Killers: The Secret Services of the USSR 1917–1991, New York: Barnes & Noble.
- Kerikmäe, T.; Hamulak, O. & Chochia, A. (2016), ‘A historical study of contemporary human rights: deviation or extinction?’ Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 98−115. https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2016.2.0610.11590/abhps.2016.2.06
- Kerikmäe, T. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2014), ‘The Europeanization of law curricula in Eastern Partnership countries: best practices of EU Member States,’ in N. Šišková (ed.) From Eastern Partnership to the Association. The Legal and Political Analysis, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 267−280.
- Kerikmäe, T. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2012), ‘Less is more or more is more? Revisiting universality of human rights,’ International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35−51.
- Kestenberg, J. S. & Kahn, C. (1998), Children Surviving Persecution: An International Study of Trauma and Healing, Westport: Praeger Publishers.
- Koehler, J. O. (1999), Stasi: The Untold Story of the East German Secret Police, Boulder: Westview Press.
- Khazanov, A. M. (2008), ‘Whom to mourn and whom to forget? (Re)constructing collective memory in contemporary Russia,’ Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, vol. 9, no. 2–3, pp. 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1469076080209491710.1080/14690760802094917
- Khmel v. Russia [2013], ECHR, no. 20383/04.
- Klass and others v. Germany [1978], ECHR, no. 5029/71.
- Koch v. Germany [2012], ECHR, no. 497/09.
- Küchl v. Austria [2013], ECHR, no. 51151/06.
- Kużelewska, E. (2005), ‘How far can citizens influence the decision-making process? Analysis of the effectiveness of referenda in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary in 1989–2015,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 5, no. 2 (19), pp. 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2015-001910.1515/bjes-2015-0019
- Laduna v. Slovakia [2011], ECHR, no. 31827/02.
- Law on Lustration (1999), Lietuvos Respublikos asmenų, slapta bendradarbiavusių su buvusios SSRS specialiosiomis tarnybomis, registracijos, prisipažinimo, įskaitos ir prisipažinusiųjų apsaugos įstatymas [Republic of Lithuania Law on the Registration, Confession, Entering into Record of the Persons of the Republic of Lithuania Who Engaged Themselves in Secret Collaboration with the Former USSR Special Services and Protection of Those Who Confessed It], Valstybės žinios, 1999, no. 104-2976, as amended by TAR, 2015-07-03, no. 10826.
- Law on the State and Official Secrets (1999), Lietuvos Respublikos valstybės ir tarnybos paslapčių įstatymas [Republic of Lithuania Law on the State and Official Secrets], Valstybės žinios, 1999, no. 105-3019 as amended by TAR, 2015-11-27, no. 18923.
- Leander v. Sweden [1987], ECHR, no. 9248/81. Lillo-Stenberg and Sæther v. Norway [2014], ECHR, no. 13258/09.
- Lykes, M. B. & Mersky, M. (2006), ‘Reparations and mental health: psychosocial interventions towards healing, human agency, and rethreading social realities,’ in P. de Greiff (ed.) The Handbook of Reparations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 589–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199291926.003.001810.1093/0199291926.003.0018
- M.G. v. The United Kingdom [2002], ECHR, no. 39393/98.
- M. and M. v. Croatia [2015], ECHR, no. 10161/13. Martin v. the United Kingdom [1996], the European Commission of Human Rights (First Chamber), no. 27533/95.
- McDonald v. the United Kingdom [2014], ECHR, no. 4241/1.
- Mertelsmann, O. & Rahi-Tamm, A. (2009), ‘Soviet mass violence in Estonia revisited,’ Journal of Genocide Research, vol. 11, no. 2–3, pp. 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462352090311900110.1080/14623520903119001
- Mitroiu, S. (2016), ‘Recuperative memory in Romanian post-Communist society,’ Nationalities Papers, https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2016.118214410.1080/00905992.2016.1182144
- Munjaz v. the United Kingdom [2012], ECHR, no. 2913/06.
- Nada v. Switzerland [2012], ECHR, no. 10593/08.
- Niemietz v. Germany [1992], ECHR, no. 13710/88.
- Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2014), ‘The future of universality of rights,’ in T. Kerikmäe, (ed.) Protection of Human Rights in the EU: Controversies and Challenges of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38902-3_310.1007/978-3-642-38902-3_3
- Odièvre v. France [2003], ECHR, no. 42326/98.
- Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine [2013], ECHR, no. 21722/11.
- Pope, K. S. (2012), ‘Psychological assessment of torture survivors: Essential steps, avoidable errors, and helpful resources,’ International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, vol. 35, pp. 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.01710.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.017
- Pretty v. the United Kingdom [2002], ECHR, no. 2346/02.
- Reid, K. (2004), A Practitioner’s Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights, London: Thomson: Sweet & Maxwell.
- Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece [2009], ECHR, no. 1234/05.
- Roche v. the United Kingdom [2005], ECHR, no. 32555/96.
- Rotaru v. Romania [2000], ECHR [GC], no. 28341/95.
- Rothe v. Austria [2013], ECHR, no. 6490/07. S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [2008], ECHR, nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04.
- Segerstedt-Wiberg and others v. Sweden [2006], ECHR, no. 62332/00.
- Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania Statute (1994), Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo statutas [Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania Statute], Valstybės žinios, 1994, no. 15-249, as amended by Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo statutas “Dėl Lietuvos Respublikos Seimo statuto Nr. I-399 67, 136, 170 ir 171 straipsnių pakeitimo” [the Republic of Lithuania Statute concerning the amendment of articles 67, 136, 170 and 171 the Republic of Lithuania Statute no. I-399], TAR, 2015, no. 20274.
- S.H. and others v. Austria [2011], ECHR, no. 57813/00.
- Skultans, V. (2001), ‘Arguing with the KGB Archives. Archival and Narrative Memory in Post-Soviet Latvia,’ Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 320–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014184012009512210.1080/00141840120095122
- Ternovszky v. Hungary [2010], ECHR, no. 67545/09. Tysiąc v. Poland [2007], ECHR, no. 5410/03.
- Udovič, B. & Podgornik, A. (2016), ‘Cultural Diplomacy of Slavic European Union Member States: A Cross-country Analysis,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 6, no. 2 (21), pp. 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2016-001510.1515/bjes-2016-0015
- UN General Assembly (2005), Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 60/147 of 16 December 2005. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RemedyAndReparation.aspx [accessed 27 Sep 2017]
- Uzun v. Germany [2010], ECHR, no. 35623/05.
- V.C. v. Slovakia [2011], ECHR, no. 18968/07.
- Van Kuck v. Germany [2003], ECHR, no. 35968/97.
- Verdery, K. (2013), ‘An Anthropologist in Communist Romania, 1973–1988,‘ Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-821660040510.2753/PPC1075-8216600405
- Von Hannover v. Germany (No. 2) [2012], ECHR, nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08.