Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Spatial expansion pattern of black cherry Padus serotina Ehrh. in suburban zone of Białystok (NE Poland) Cover

Spatial expansion pattern of black cherry Padus serotina Ehrh. in suburban zone of Białystok (NE Poland)

Open Access
|May 2016

References

  1. Chmura D. 2004. Penetration and naturalisation of invasive alien plant species (neophytes) in woodlands of the Silesian Upland (Southern Poland). Nat. Conserv. 60: 3-11.
  2. Deckers B., Verheyen K., Vanhellemont M., Maddens E., Muys B. & Hermy M. 2008. Impact of avian frugivores on dispersal and recruitment of the invasive Prunus serotina in an agricultural landscape. Biol. Invasions 10: 717-727.10.1007/s10530-007-9164-3
  3. Dormann C. F. 2007. Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 129-138.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00279.x
  4. Faliński J. B. 1968. Stadia neofityzmu i stosunek neofitów do innych komponentów zbiorowiska. Mater. Zakł. Fitosoc. Stos. Uniw. Warszawskiego 25: 15-23.
  5. Halarewicz A. 2011a. Odnawianie się czeremchy amerykańskiej (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) na siedliskach borowych. Sylwan 155(8): 530-534.
  6. Halarewicz A. 2011b. Przyczyny i skutki inwazji czeremchy amerykańskiej Prunus serotina w ekosystemach leśnych. Leśne Pr. Bad. 72(3): 267-272.10.2478/v10111-011-0026-5
  7. Hastings A., Cuddington K., Davies K. F., Dugaw C. J., Elmendorf S., Freestone A., Harrison S., Holland M., Lambrinos J., Malvadkar U., Melbourne B. A., Moore K., Taylor C. & Thomson D. 2005. The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol. Letters 8: 91-101.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00687.x
  8. Higgins S. I. & Richardson D. M. 1996. A review of models of alien plant spread. Ecol. Model. 87(1-3): 249-265.10.1016/0304-3800(95)00022-4
  9. Jackowiak B. 1998. Struktura przestrzenna flory dużego miasta. Studium metodyczno-problemowe. Prace Zakładu Taksonomii Roślin UAM w Poznaniu 8: 1-227. Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań.
  10. Křivánek M., Pyšek P. & Jarošík V. 2006. Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv. Biol. 20(5): 1487-1498.
  11. Nathan A. & Muller-Landau H. C. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Tree 15(7): 278-285.
  12. Pearson R. G. & Dawson T. P. 2005. Long-distance plant dispersal and habitat fragmentation: identifying conservation targets for spatial landscape planning under climate change. Biol. Conserv. 123(3): 389-401.
  13. Pyšek P., Jarošik V. & Kučera T. 2002. Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves. Biol. Conserv. 104: 13-24.10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00150-1
  14. Richardson D. M. & Pyšek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invisibility. Prog. Phys. Geog. 30(3): 409-431.
  15. Rouget M. & Richardson D. M. 2003. Understanding patterns of plant invasion at different spatial scales: quantifying the roles of environment and propagule pressure. In: L. E. Child, J. H. Brock, G. Brundu, K. Prach, P. Pyšek, P. M. Wade & M. Williamson (eds.). Plant invasions: ecological threats and management solutions, pp. 3-15. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
  16. Sebert-Cuvillier E., Simon-Goyheneche V., Paccaut F., Chabrerie O., Goubet O. & Decocq G. 2008. Spatial spread of an alien tree species in a heterogeneous forest landscape: a spatially realistic simulation model. Landscape Ecol. 23: 787-801.10.1007/s10980-008-9237-4
  17. Stypiński P. 1977. Odnawianie się czeremchy amerykańskiej (Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh.) w lasach na Pojezierzu Mazurskim. Sylwan 121(10): 47-57.
  18. Thiele J. & Otte A. 2008. Invasion patterns of Heracleum mantegazzianum in Germany on the regional and landscape scales. J. Nat. Conserv. 16(2): 61-71.
  19. Thuiller W., Alberta C., Araújob M. B., Berryc P. M., Cabezad M., Guisane A., Hic klerf T., Mid gleyg G. F., Patersonc J., Schurrh F. M., Sykesf M. T. & Zimmermanni N. E. 2008. Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: Future challenges. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 9(3-4): 137-152.10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004
  20. Tilman D. & Kareiva P. M. 1997. Spatial ecology: The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. 368 pp. Princeton University Press, Ptrinceton.10.1515/9780691188362
  21. Tokarska-Guzik B. 2005. The Establishment and Spread of Alien Plant Species (Kenophytes) in the Flora of Poland. Prace naukowe Uniw. Śląskiego w Katowicach 2372: 1-192.
  22. Tokarska-Guzik B., Dajdok Z., Zając M., Zając A., Urbisz A., Danielewicz W. & Hołdyński C. 2012. Rośliny obcego pochodzenia w Polsce ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem gatunków inwazyjnych. 197 pp. Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa.
  23. With K. A. 2002. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv. Biol. 16(5): 1192-1203.
  24. Wołkowycki D. 2004. The influence of some features of the landscape structure on the flora of alien woody species. Ecol. Questions 4: 133-140.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biorc-2015-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 67
Submitted on: Jun 15, 2015
Accepted on: Dec 21, 2015
Published on: May 6, 2016
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2016 Dan Wołkowycki, Paweł Próchnicki, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.