Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The force applied to the knee extensor mechanism differs between flat-footed and normal subjects during walking Cover

The force applied to the knee extensor mechanism differs between flat-footed and normal subjects during walking

Biomedical Human Kinetics
Volume 10 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)
By: Mohsen Razeghi,  Samaneh Ebrahimi,  Farzaneh Yazdani and  Behdad Tahayori  
Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. 1. Bok S.K., Kim B.O., Lim J.H., Ahn S.Y. (2014) Effects of custom-made rigid foot orthosis on pes planus in children over 6 years old. Ann. Rehabil. Med., 38(3): 369-375.10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.369
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Bressel E. (2001) The influence of ergometer pedaling direction on peak patellofemoral joint forces. Clin. Bio­mech., 16(5): 431-437.10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00009-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Cappozzo A., Catani F., Della Croce U., Leardini A. (1995) Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determina­tion. Clin. Biomech., 10(4): 171-178.10.1016/0268-0033(95)91394-T
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Chen Y.C., Lou S.Z., Huang C.Y., Su F.C. (2010) Effects of foot orthoses on gait patterns of flat feet patients. Clin. Biomech., 25(3): 265-270.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.00720015581
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Deleo A., Dierks T., Ferber R. ( 2004) Lower extremity joint coupling during running: a current update. Clin. Bi­omech., 19(10): 983-991.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.07.00515531047
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. De Ruiter CJ, De Korte A, Schreven S, De Haan A. (2010) Leg dominancy in relation to fast isometric torque production and squat jump height. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.,108(2): 247.10.1007/s00421-009-1209-0279963019777253
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Duval K., Lam T., Sanderson D. (2010) The mechanical relationship between the rearfoot, pelvis and low-back. Gait Posture, 32(4): 637-640.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.09.00720889344
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Feiss HO. (1909) A simple method of estimating the com­mon variations and deformities of the foot. Am. J. Med. Sci., 138(2): 213-230.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Hannigan-downs K., Harter R., Smith G. (2000) Ra­diographic validation and reliability of selected clinical measures of pronation. J. Athlet. Train., 35: 12-30.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Hunt A., Smith R. (2004) Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walk­ing. Clin. Biomech., 19(4): 391-397.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.01015109760
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Karatsolis K., Nikolopoulos C., Papadopoulos E., Vage­nas G., Terzis E., Athanasopoulos S. (2009) Eversion and inversion muscle group peak torque in hyperpronated and normal individuals. The Foot, 19(1): 29-35.10.1016/j.foot.2008.06.00620307446
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Khamis S., Yizhar Z. (2007) Effect of feet hyperprona­tion on pelvic alignment in a standing position. Gait Pos­ture , 25(1): 127-134.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.00516621569
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Khan W., Nokes L., Jones R., Johnson D. (2007) The re­lationship of the angle of immobilisation of the knee to the force applied to the extensor mechanism when par­tially weight-bearing. Bone Joint J., 89: 911-914.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Kim J.A., Lim O.B., Yi C.H. (2015) Difference in static and dynamic stability between flexible flatfeet and neu­tral feet. Gait Posture, 41(2): 546-550.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.01225560044
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Leung A., Mak A., Evans J. (1998) Biomechanical gait evaluation of the immediate effect of orthotic treatment for flexible flat foot. Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 22(1): 25-34.10.3109/030936498091644549604273
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Nordin M., Frankel V. (2001) Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system, Philadelphia, Lippincott Wil­liams & Wilkins.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Perry J., Gait analysis: normal and pathological function, SLACK incorporated, 1992.10.1097/01241398-199211000-00023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Pohl M., Messenger N., Buckley J. (2007) Forefoot, rear­foot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait. Gait Posture, 25(2): 295-302.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.04.01216759862
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Sammarco G., (1989) Biomechanics of the foot. In: Nordin M., Frankel V., (eds.) Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system: Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. p. 163-181.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Shariatmadari M., English R., Rothwell G. ( 2010) A re­view of developments into therapeutic running footwear research. Procedia Eng., 2(2): 2811-2816.10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.071
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Smith-oricchio K., Harris B. (1990) Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 12(1): 10-15.10.2519/jospt.1990.12.1.1018796888
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Tateuchi H., Wada O., Ichihashi N. (2011) Effects of cal­caneal eversion on three-dimensional kinematics of the hip, pelvis and thorax in unilateral weight bearing. Hum. Mov. Sci., 30(3): 566-573.10.1016/j.humov.2010.11.01121459469
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Tiberio D. (1987) The effect of excessive subtalar joint pronation on patellofemoral mechanics: a theoretical model. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 9(4): 160-165.10.2519/jospt.1987.9.4.16018797010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Wang W., Crompton R. (2004) Analysis of the human and ape foot during bipedal standing with implications for the evolution of the foot. J. Biomech., 37(12): 1831-1836.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.03615519591
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Wilken J.M., Rodriguez K.M., Brawner M., Darter B.J. (2012) Reliability and minimal detectible change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults. Gait Posture, 35(2): 301-307.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.10522041096
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Williams D.S., Mcclay I.S., Hamill J., Buchanan T.S. (2001) Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic differ­ences in runners with high and low arches. J. Appl. Bio­mech., 17(2): 153-163.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Yamaguchi G., Zajac F. (1989) A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism. J. Biomech., 22(1): 1-10.10.1016/0021-9290(89)90179-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bhk-2018-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2080-2234
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 101 - 106
Submitted on: Jan 30, 2018
Accepted on: Jul 2, 2018
Published on: Jul 26, 2018
Published by: University of Physical Education in Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Flat foot - Motion analysis - Knee extensor mechanism
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
Basic medical science, other,
Clinical medicine,
Public health,
Sports and recreation,
Physical education,
Sports and recreation, other

© 2018 Mohsen Razeghi, Samaneh Ebrahimi, Farzaneh Yazdani, Behdad Tahayori, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)Next article