Discourse Intonation and Information Structure: An Empirical Study of Existential There Constructions in Non-native Spontaneous Speech
By:
References
- Baker, Rachel Elizabeth. 2010. The acquisition of English focus marking by non-native speakers. (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University.
- Baumann, Stefan–Martine Grice. 2006. The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1636–1657.
- Boersma, Paul–David Weenink. 2016. PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org
- Celce-Murcia, Marianne. 2007. Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In: E. Alcón Soler, M. P. Safont Jordà (eds), Intercultural language use and language learning, 41–57. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Celce-Murcia, Marianne–Dörnyei, Zoltán–Thurrell, Sarah. 1995. Communicative competence: a pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics 6(2): 5–35.
- Chafe, Wallace. 2001. The analysis of discourse flow. In: Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), The handbook of discourse analysis, 673–687. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
- Chun, Dorothy M. 1998. Signal analysis software for teaching discourse intonation. Language Learning and Technology 2(1): 61–77.
- 2002. Discourse intonation in L2: from theory and research to practice. Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
- Cooper, Nicole–Cutler, Anne–Wales, Roger. 2002. Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech 45: 207–28.
- Cutler, Anne–Wales, Roger–Cooper, Nicole–Janssen, Joris H. 2007. Dutch listeners’ use of suprasegmental cues to English stress. In: Trouvain, J., Barry, W. J. (eds), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences, 1913–1916. Dudweiler: Pirrot.
- Engen, Kristin J. Van–Baese-Berk, Melissa–E. Baker, Rachel–Choi, Arim–Kim, Midam–R. Bradlow, Ann. 2010. The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech 53(4): 510–540.
- Gorjian, Bahman–Hayati, Abdolmajid–Pourkhoni, Parisa. 2013. Using Praat software in teaching prosodic features to EFL learners. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 84: 34–40.
- Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hardison, Debra M. 2004. Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning and Technology 8(1): 34–52.
- Hirschberg, Julia–Gravano, Agustín–Nenkova, Ani–Sneed, Elisa–Ward, Gregory. 2007. Intonational overload: uses of the downstepped (H*! H* -L %) contour in read and spontaneous speech. Laboratory Phonology 9: 455–482.
- Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. The phonology of English as an international language: new models, new norms, new goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kaltenboeck, Gunther. 2001. A multimedia approach to suprasegmentals: using a CD-ROM for English intonation teaching. Proceedings of Phonetics Teaching & Learning Conference.
- Kang, Okim–Rubin, Don–Pickering, Lucy. 2010. Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal 94: 554–566.
- Lai, Yuwen. 2008. Acoustic realization and perception of English lexical stress by Mandarin learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas.
- Lecumberri, Maria Luisa Garcia–Cooke, Martin–Cutler, Anne. 2010. Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: a review. Speech Communication 52(11–12): 864–886.
- Lennes, Mietta. 2011. SpeCT – The Speech Corpus Toolkit for Praat. http://www.helsinki.fi/~lennes/praat-scripts/ (1 January, 2016).
- Levis, John M.–Pickering, Lucy. 2004. Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System 32: 505–524.
- Major, Roy C. 2001. Foreign accent: the ontogeny and philogeny of second language phonology. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Mennen, Ineke. 2004. Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics 32: 543–563.
- Munro, Murray J.–M. Derwing, Tracey. 1999. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 49(Supplement 1): 285–310.
- Nagy, Judit 2009. Magyar nyelvtanulók angol lexikai hangsúlyának akusztikai vizsgálata [An acoustic phonetic study of Hungarian language learners’ lexical stress]. In: Váradi, Tamás (ed.), Alkalmazott Nyelvészeti Doktorandusz Konferencia 3: 87–98. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet.
- 2014. The use of speech visualization technology in prosody teaching. In: Varga, Cristina (ed.), New trends in language didactics: Noi direcţii în didactica limbilor, 95–107. Cluj: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
- 2015. The use of intonational cues marking new information in non-native speech. EduLingua 2(1): 1–14.
- (forthcoming). Features of native and non-native spontaneous speech presenting new information. Proceedings of the 6th ELLE International Conference on English Language and Literatures in English. Oradea: Romania: Partium Christian University.
- Pajak, Bozena–Levy, Roger. 2014. The role of abstraction in non-native speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 46: 147–160.
- Pickering, Lucy. 2004. The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and non-native speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes 23(1): 19–43.
- Pierrehumbert, Janet Breckenridge. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Prince, Ellen F. 1992. The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In: Mann, William C., Thompson, Sandra A. (eds), Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund raising text, 295–325. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Sadowsky, Scott. 2016. Massive Speech Corpus Tool (MaSCoT) 2.4. http://sadowsky.cl/praat.html.
- Schafer, Amy J.–R. Speer, Shari–Warren, Paul–White, S. David. 2000. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(2): 169–182.
- Sennema, Anke, R.–van de Vijver S. E., Carroll–Zimmer-Stahl, A. 2005. Focus accent, word length and position as cues to L1 and L2 word recognition. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 03: 183–198.
- Tanner, Mark–M. Landon, Melissa. 2009. The effects of computer-assisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners’ use of pausing, stress, intonation, and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning and Technology 13(3): 51–65.
- Trouvain, Jurgen–Gut, Ulrike (eds). 2007. Non-native prosody: phonetic description and teaching practice. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Vaissière, Jacqueline. 2008. Perception of intonation. The handbook of speech perception, 236–263. doi:10.1002/9780470757024.ch10.
- Venditti, Jennifer J.–Hirschberg, Julia. 2003. Intonation and discourse processing. Proceedings of ICPhS, Barcelona, 107–114.
- Vijver, Ruben van de–Sennema, Anke–Zimmer–Stahl, Anne. 2006. An analysis of pitch and duration in material used to test L2 processing of words. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 00: 209–221.
- Ward, Gregory–J. Birner, Betty. 2001. Discourse and information structure. In: Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi (eds), Handbook of discourse analysis, 119–137. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Wennerstrom, Ann. 1994. Intonational meaning in English discourse: a study of non-native speakers. Applied Linguistics 15(4): 399–420.
- Ying, H. G. 1996. Multiple constraints on processing ambiguous sentences: evidence from adult L2 learners. Language Learning 46(4): 681–711.
- Wildcat Corpus of Native- and Foreign-Accented English. http://groups.linguistics.northwestern.edu/speech_comm_group/wildcat/.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2016-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2068-2956
Language: English, German
Page range: 139 - 153
Published on: Feb 7, 2017
Published by: Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2017 Judit Nagy, published by Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.