Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Indexicality or Technological Intermediate? Moving Image Representation, Materiality, and the Real Cover

Indexicality or Technological Intermediate? Moving Image Representation, Materiality, and the Real

By: James Verdon  
Open Access
|Sep 2016

References

  1. Abramson, Albert. 2003. The History of Television, 1942 to 2000. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
  2. Arnheim, Rudolf. 1957. Film as Art. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  3. Atkins, Albert. 2005. Peirce on the Index and Indexical Reference. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society vol. 41. no. 1: 161–188.
  4. Bazin, André. 1960. The Ontology of the Photographic Image. Film Quarterly vol. 13. no. 4: 4–9.10.1525/fq.1960.13.4.04a00030
  5. Brady, David Jones. 2009. Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons and The Optical Society of America.10.1002/9780470443736
  6. Burks, Arthur W. 1949. Icon, Index and Symbol. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research vol. 9. no. 4: 673–689.
  7. Case, Dominic. 2001. Film Technology in Post Production. Burlington: Elsevier.
  8. Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  9. Cubitt, Sean. 1998. Digital Aesthetics. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
  10. Elsaesser, Thomas. 2009. Ingmar Bergman in the Museum? Thresholds, Limits, Conditions of Possibility. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture (online) vol. 1. http://www.aestheticsandculture.net/index.php/jac/article/view/2123. Last accessed 05.06.2016.
  11. Gaut, Berys. 2009. Digital Cinema. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film, eds. Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga, 75–85. Abingdon: Routledge.
  12. Gaut, Berys. 2010. A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511674716
  13. Goudge, Thomas A. 1965. Peirce’s Index. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society vol. 1. no. 2: 52–70.
  14. Gunning, Tom. 2007. Moving Away from the Index: Cinema and the Impression of Reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies vol. 18 no. 1: 29–52.10.1215/10407391-2006-022
  15. Harward, Tristan. 2007. Shadow mask vs aperture grille. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shadowmask_vs_aperture_grille.jpg. Last accessed 07.01.2016.
  16. Hoopes, James, ed. 1991. Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
  17. Jähne, Bernd. 2005. Digital Image Processing. Heidelberg: Springer.
  18. Kracauer, Siegfried. 1997 [1960]. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  19. Kuhn, Annette. 2009. ‘Screen’ and Screen Theorising Today. Screen vol. 50. no. 1: 1–12.10.1093/screen/hjp001
  20. Manovich, Lev. 1999. What is Digital Cinema? In The Digital Dialectic: New Essays on New Media, ed. Peter Lunenfeld, 172–197. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  21. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.10.22230/cjc.2002v27n1a1280
  22. Mitchell, William John. 1992. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  23. Mulvey, Laura. 2004. Passing Time: Reflections on Cinema from a New Technological Age. Screen vol. 45. no. 2: 142–155.10.1093/screen/45.2.142
  24. Mulvey, Laura. 2006. Death 24x a Second: Stillness and the Moving Image. London: Reaktion Books.
  25. O’Quinn, Donnie and Matt LeClair. 1996. Digital Prepress Complete. Indianapolis: Hayden Books.
  26. Panofsky, Erwin. 1997. Style and Medium in the Motion Pictures. In Three Essays on Style, ed. Irving Lavin, 93–127. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  27. Poynton, Charles. 2003. Digital Video and HDTV: Algorithms and Interfaces. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  28. Rodowick, David Norman. 2007. The Virtual Life of Film. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042834
  29. Santina, M. S. and A. R. Stubberud. 2005. Basics of Sampling and Quantization. In Handbook of Networked and Embedded Control Systems, ed. Dimitrios Hristu-Varsakelis and William S. Levine, 45–69. Boston: Birkhäuser.10.1007/0-8176-4404-0_3
  30. Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498350
  31. Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. 1998. For Television: Three-Channel RGB Analog Video Interface. New York: Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers.
  32. Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. 2004. For Television: Composite Analog Video Signal – NTSC for Studio Applications. New York: Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers.
  33. Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers. 2006. For Television: Analog Recording: 1/2-in Type M-2 – Electrical Parameters of Video, Audio, Time and Control Code and Tracking Control. New York: Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers.
  34. Spielmann, Yvonne. 2008 [2005]. Video: The Reflexive Medium. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  35. Stewart, Garrett. 2007. Framed Time: Toward a Postfilmic Cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226774572.001.0001
  36. Watkinson, John. 2008. The Art of Digital Video. Burlington: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-240-52005-6.50009-7
  37. Weiss, Paul and Arthur W Burks. 1945. Peirce’s Sixty-Six Signs. The Journal of Philosophy vol. 42. no. 14: 383–388.10.2307/2019195
  38. Williams, Raymond. 1990. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London: Routledge.
Language: English
Page range: 191 - 209
Published on: Sep 24, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 James Verdon, published by Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.