Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Polaroid and the Cross. Media-Reflexivity and Allegorical Figurations in Lucian Pintilie’s The Oak (1992) Cover

The Polaroid and the Cross. Media-Reflexivity and Allegorical Figurations in Lucian Pintilie’s The Oak (1992)

By: Katalin Sándor  
Open Access
|Sep 2016

References

  1. Bădică, Simina. 2012. Historicizing the Absence: The Missing Photographic Documents of Romanian Late Communism. Colloquia. Journal of Central European History vol. XIX: 40–62.
  2. Blos-Jáni, Melinda. 2013. Men with the Movie Camera between 1945 and 1989. Domesticating Moving Image Technology under Communism. Martor no. 18: 77–92.
  3. Buse, Peter. 2010. The Polaroid Image as Photo-Object. Journal of Visual Culture vol. 9. no. 2: 189–207.10.1177/1470412910372754
  4. Doane, Mary Ann. 2009. Scale and the Negotiation of ‘Real’ and ‘Unreal’ Space in the Cinema. In Realism and the Audiovisual Media, eds. Lúcia Nagib and Cecília Mello, 63–81. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230246973_5
  5. Caufman-Blumenfeld, Odette. 1998. The Oak: A Balancing Act from Page to Screen. Film/Literature Quarterly vol. 26. no. 4: 267–278.
  6. Foucault, Michel. 1986. Of Other Spaces. Diacritics vol. 16. no. 1: 22–27.10.2307/464648
  7. Gorzo, Andrei. 2013. Concerning the Local Precursors of the New Romanian Realism. Close Up. Film and Media Studies vol. 1. no.1: 4–12.
  8. Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile Bodies. Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  9. Guibert, Hervé. 2014. Ghost Image. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226132488.001.0001
  10. Kaplan, E. Ann and Ban Wang. 2004. Introduction. From Traumatic Paralysis to the Force Field of Modernity. In Trauma and Cinema. Cross Cultural Explorations, eds. Kaplan, E. Ann and Wang, Ban, 1–22. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
  11. Király, Hajnal. 2010. Könyv és film között. A hűségelven innen és túl. [Between Book and Film. Beyond the Fidelity Principle.] Kolozsvár: Koinónia.
  12. Király, Hajnal. 2015. Leave to Live? Placeless People in Contemporary Hungarian and Romanian Films of Return. Studies in Eastern European Cinema vol. 6. no. 2: 169–183.10.1080/2040350X.2015.1051822
  13. Király, Hajnal. 2016. Looking West: Understanding Socio-Political Allegories and Art References in Contemporary Romanian Cinema. Manuscript, forthcoming in Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Film and Media Studies.10.1515/ausfm-2016-0004
  14. Kiss, Kata. 2011. Az identitásszörny, a szent mártír és az ellenálló. Férfi versus női prostituáltak a kortárs magyar filmben. [The Identity Monster, the Saintly Martyr, and the Resistant. Male versus Female Prostitutes in Contemporary Hungarian Cinema.] Metropolis no. 3: 42–54.
  15. Kovács, András Bálint. 2007. Screening Modernism: European Art Cinema, 1950–1980. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226451664.001.0001
  16. Kristeva, Julia. 1989. Holbein’s Dead Christ. In Black Sun. Depression and Melancholia, 105–138. New York: Columbia University Press.
  17. Mitchell, W. J. Thomas. 2005. Addressing Media. In What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images, 201–221. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001
  18. Mulvey, Laura. 2006. Death Death 24x a Second. Stillness and the Moving Image. London: Reaktion Books.
  19. Nagib, Lúcia. 2014. Reflexive Stasis, Scale Reversal and the Myth of Modern Cinema. In Inert Cities: Globalization, Mobility and Suspension in Visual Culture, eds. Stephanie Hemelryk Donald and Christoph Lindner, 187–201. London: I. B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755694846.ch-0010
  20. Nasta, Dominique. 2013. Contemporary Romanian Cinema. The History of an Unexpected Miracle. London and New York: Wallflower Press – Columbia University Press.10.7312/columbia/9780231167451.001.0001
  21. Paech, Joachim. 2000. Artwork – Text – Medium. Steps en Route to Intermediality. http://www.uni-konstanz.de/FuF/Philo/LitWiss/MedienWiss/Texte/interm.html. Last accessed 15. 02. 2011.
  22. Pethő, Ágnes. 2011. The Passion for the In-Between. Cinema and Intermediality. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  23. Pethő, Ágnes. 2014. The Tableau Vivant as a “Figure of Return” in Contemporary East European Cinema. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Film and Media Studies vol. 9: 51–76.10.1515/ausfm-2015-0003
  24. Peucker, Brigitte. 2008. Tableau Vivant in Film: Intermediality and the Real. In Intermedialität – Analog/Digital. Theorien – Methoden Analysen, eds. Paech, Joachim and Jens Schröter, 291–300. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.10.30965/9783846743744_021
  25. Pop, Doru. 2014. Romanian New Wave Cinema. An Introduction. Jefferson: Mcfarland & Company, Inc. Publishers.
  26. Sándor, Katalin. 2016. Filming the Camera – Reflexivity and Reenactment in Lucian Pintilie’s Reconstruction (1969) and Niki and Flo (2003). Manuscript, forthcoming in The New Romanian Cinema, eds. Stojanova, Christina and Duma, Dana. Edinburgh University Press.
  27. Sobchack, Vivian. 2004. Carnal Thoughts. Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520937826
  28. Xavier, Ismail. 2004. Historical Allegory. In A Companion to Film Theory, eds. Toby Miller and Robert Stam, 333–362. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470998410.ch18
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 66
Published on: Sep 24, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Katalin Sándor, published by Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.