Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analyses Of Research For Understanding The Problems Of Patients With Diabetes Cover

Analyses Of Research For Understanding The Problems Of Patients With Diabetes

Open Access
|Apr 2017

References

  1. 1. Luft R. (1986). Filling the gaps. Presentation at WHO Conference on Diabetes Care as a Model for Primary Health Care. Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.
  2. 2. Chenitz, W. C., & Swanson, J. M. (1986). Qualitative research using grounded theory. In W. C. Chenitz & J. M. Swanson (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory (pp. 3-15). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  3. 3. Babler, E.K. & Strickland, C.J. (2000). Moving the journey towards independence: Adolescents transitioning to successful diabetes selfmanagement P17-19.
  4. 4. Preventing insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: the environmental challenge. Diabetes Epidemiology Research International. (1987). Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 295(6596), 479-481.10.1136/bmj.295.6596.47912473373117180
  5. 5. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research: Sage Publications.
  6. 6. Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W. & Haynes, R.B. (2000). Evidence Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone
  7. 7. Morse, J.M., Penrod, J. & Hupcey, J.E. (2000). Qualitative outcome analysis: evaluating nursing interventions for complex clinical phenomena. J Nurs Scholarsh. 32(2), 125-130..10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00125.x10887710
  8. 8. Miller, W.R. (2010). Qualitative Research Findings as Evidence: Utility in Nursing Practice. Clinical Nurse Specialist CNS, 24(4), 191-193. http://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181e36087.10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181e36087302178520526118
  9. 9. Barbour R. (2000). The role of qualitative research in broadening the “evidence base” for clinical practice. J Eval Clin Prac. 6(2), 155-163.10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00213.x10970009
  10. 10. Cohen, D.J. & Crabtree, B.F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med. 6(4), 331-339. doi: 10.1370/afm.818
  11. 11. Baker, G.R. (2011). The contribution of case study research to knowledge of how to improve quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf. 20 Suppl 1, i30-35. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046490.
  12. 12. Dougherty, D. & Conway, P.H. (2008). The „3T’s” road map to transform US health care: the „how” of high-quality care. JAMA. 299(19), 2319-2321. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2319
  13. 13. Berwick, D.M. (2008). The science of improvement. JAMA. 299(10), 1182-1184. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.10.1182
  14. 14. Sparkes, A.C. (2001). Myth 94: qualitative health researchers will agree about validity. Qual Health Res. 11(4), 538-552. doi: 10.1177/104973230101100409
  15. 15. Speziale, H.S. & Carpenter, D.R. (2007). Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/arsm-2017-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1841-4036 | Journal ISSN: 1223-9666
Language: English
Page range: 53 - 58
Published on: Apr 22, 2017
Published by: Ovidius University of Constanta
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Doina Catrinoiu, L. R. Craciun, Sorina-Alina Cristea, published by Ovidius University of Constanta
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.