References
- 1. Hernandez, Y., Tarazona, B., Zamora, N., Cibrian, R., Gandia, J.L. & Paredes, V. (2015). Comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy in measuring mesiodistal tooth sizes using three different methods: 2D digital, 3D CBCT, and 3D CBCT segmented. Oral Radiology. 31(3), 165-172. doi: 10.1007/s11282-015-0204-x10.1007/s11282-015-0204-x
- 2. Brullmann, D. & Schulze, R.K. (2015). Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 44(1), 20140204. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.2014020410.1259/dmfr.20140204461415825168812
- 3. Ghaeminia, H., Meijer, G.J., Soehardi, A., Borstlap, W.A., Mulder, J., Vlijmen, O.J., Berge, S.J. & Maal, T.J. (2011). The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 40(8), 834-839. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.02.03210.1016/j.ijom.2011.02.03221507612
- 4. Horner, K., Islam, M., Flygare, L., Tsiklakis, K. & Whaites, E. (2009). Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 38(4), 187-195. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/7494101210.1259/dmfr/7494101219372107
- 5. Kursun, S., Hakan, K.M., Bengi, O. & Nihat, A. (2015). Use of cone beam computed tomography to determine the accuracy of panoramic radiological markers: A pilot study. Journal of Dental Sciences. 10(2), 167-171. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2013.04.003.10.1016/j.jds.2013.04.003
- 6. Amarnath, G.S., Kumar, U., Hilal, M., Muddugangadhar, B.C., Anshuraj, K. & Shruthi, C.S. (2015). Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Orthopantomography with Direct Ridge Mapping for Pre-Surgical Planning to Place Implants in Cadaveric Mandibles: An Ex-Vivo Study. J Int Oral Health. 7(Suppl 1), 38-42..