Bioethics in animal experimentation
References
- 1. Kolar, R., (2006), Animal experimentation,Volume 12 issue 1 2006, doi 10.1007%2Fs11948-006-0011-,1
- 2. ***. (2005). Commission of the European Communities (2005). COM(2005) 7 final, Brussels, 20.01.2005.Retrieved 17.02.2015
- 3. Sauer U.G., Spielmann H. & Rusche B. (2005). Fourth EU Report on the statistics on the number of animals used for scientific purposes in 2002 - trends, problems, conclusions.22: 19-24
- 4. Sauer U.G. & Kolar R. (2000). Developments in the collection of statistical information on the number of animals used in experiments and other scientific purposes in the European Union.28: 133-145
- 5. British Pharmacological Society. Integrative Pharmacology Fund. Imperial College London Centre for Integrative Mammalian Physiology and Pharmacology.
- 6. Monamy V. (2009).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 7. Mather J.A. (2001). Animal suffering: An invertebrate perspective.4, 151-156.
- 8. Sherwin C.M. (2001). Can invertebrates suffer? Or, how robust is argument-by-analogy?.10, 103-118.
- 9. Anon. (1986).. UK Home Office.. Retrieved 17.02.2015
- 10. Maehle A.-H. & Troehler, U. (1987). Animal experimentation from antiquity to the end of the eighteenth century: attitudes and arguments. Rupke, N.A. (ed.),, 14–47. London: Croom Helm.
- 11. Linzey, A. & Clarke, P.A.B. (2004).. Irvington, NY: Columbia University Press.
- 12. Bliss, M. (1982).. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- 13. Sharpe, R. (1988).Wellingborough, Northamptonshire: Thorsons Publishers Limited, p. 90. F. I. McMahon, Medical World News 168, 6 (1968) cited in Ibid., indicates that only one out of twenty drugs tested safe and effective on nonhuman animals are safe and effective for humans after clinical trials.
- 14. Sharpe, R. 1988.The Use of Animals in Medical Research Wellingborough, Northamptonshire: Thorsons Publishers Limited, op. cit., p. 78, 105
- 15. Sztybel, D. (2006). A Living Will Clause for Supporters of Animal Experimentation.. 23(2). doi 10.1111%2Fj.1468-5930.2006.00338.x.
- 16. Anon. (1986).. UK Home Office.. Retrieved 20.10.2014
- 17. French, R.D. (1975).. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- 18. Ryder, R.D. (2000)., second edition. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
- 19. Phillips, M.T. & Sechzer, J.A. (1989).. New York: Springer Verlag.
- 20. Poole, T. (ed.) (1999).. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
- 21. Pifer L., Shimizu K. & Pifer R..(1994) Public attitudes toward animal research: some international comparisons.2, 2., the website of. Retrieved 20.10.2014
- 22. UK Home Office 2007., Great Britain 2006. London: The Stationery Office.. Retrieved 20.10.2014.
- 23. UK Home Office 2008a... Retrieved 20.10.2014.
- 24. Hamm, T.E., Dell, R.B. & Van Sluyters, R.C. (1995). Laboratory animal care policies and regulations: United States.37: 75–8.
- 25. FRAME Toxicity Committee (1991). Animals and alternatives in toxicology: present status and future prospects.19: 116–38.
Language: English
Page range: 169 - 177
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: Ovidius University of Constanta
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2015 V.I. Popa, I. Lascar, M. Valcu, Ioana Teona Sebe, B. Caraban, Arina Cristiana Margina, published by Ovidius University of Constanta
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.