References
- Beaudeau F., Belliard M., Joly A., Seegers H. (2007). Reduction in milk yield associated with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (Map) infection in dairy cows. Vet. Res., 38: 625-634.
- Behr M., Collins D. (2010). Editors. Paratuberculosis: Organism, Disease, Control. Preston, UK, CAB International, 375 pp.
- Chongsuvivatwong V. (2012). Epicalc: Epidemiological Calculator. Rpackage version 2.14.1.6.
- Collins M., Eggleston V., Manning E. (2010). Successful control of Johne’s disease in nine dairy herds: results ofasix-year field trial. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 1638-1643.10.3168/jds.2009-2664
- Cowling D., Gardner I., Johnson W. (1999). Comparison of methods for estimation of individual- level prevalence based on pooled samples. Prev. Vet. Med., 39: 211-225.
- Eurostat (2013). Livestock: number of farms and heads of animals of different types by agricultural size of farm (UAA) and NUTS 2 regions (http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do).
- Geraghty T., Graham D. A., Mullowney P., More S.J. (2014). Areview of bovine Johne’s disease control activities in 6 endemically infected countries. Prev. Vet. Med., 116: 1-11.
- Greiner M., Dekker A. (2005). On the surveillance for animal diseases in small herds. Prev. Vet. Med., 70: 223-234.
- Kalis C.H.J., Collins M.T., Barkema H.W., Hesselink J.W. (2004). Certification of herds as free of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection: actual pooled faecal results versus certification model predictions. Prev. Vet. Med., 65: 189-204.
- Messam V., Branscum A., Collins M., Gardner I. (2008). Frequentist and Bayesian approaches to prevalence estimation using examples from Johne’s disease. Anim. Health Res. Rev., 9: 1-23.10.1017/S1466252307001314
- Osterstock J., Fosgate G., Norby B., Manning E., Collins M., Roussel A. (2007). Contribution of environmental mycobacteria to false-positive serum ELISAresults for paratuberculosis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 230: 896-901.
- Raizman E., Fetrow J., Wells S. (2009). Loss of income from cows shedding Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis prior to calving compared with cows not shedding the organism on two Minnesota dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci., 92: 4929-4936.10.3168/jds.2009-2133
- Raizman E.A., Wells S.J., Muñoz-Zanzi C.A., Tavornpanich S. (2011). Estimated within- herd prevalence (WHP) of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis inasample of Minnesota dairy herds using bacterial culture of pooled faecal samples. Can. J. Vet. Res., 75: 112-116.
- Schaik G. van, Pradenas M., Mella A. & Kruze J. (2007). Diagnostic validity and costs of pooled faecal samples and individual blood or faecal samples to determine the cow- and herd-status for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Prev. Vet. Med., 82: 159-165.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.018
- Sergeant E.S.G. (2015). Epitools epidemiological calculators. Ausvet Pty Ltd. Available at: http://epitools.ausvet.com.au.
- Sergeant E.S.G., Nielsen S.S., Toft N. (2008). Evaluation of test-strategies for estimating probability of low prevalence of paratuberculosis in Danish dairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med., 85: 92-106.
- Smith B.P. (2009). Editor. Large animal internal medicine, 4th ed. St. Louis, USA, Mosby Elsevier, 1872 pp.
- Stabel J.R. (1997). An improved method for cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples and comparison to three other methods. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 9: 375-380.10.1177/104063879700900406
- Sweeney R., Collins M., Koets A., Mc Guirk S., Roussel A. (2012). Paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease) in cattle and other susceptible species. J. Vet. Intern. Med., 26: 1239-1250.10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.01019.x
- Tavornpanich S., Gardner I., Anderson R., Shin S., Whitlock R., Fyock T., Adas- ka J., Walker R., Hietala S. (2004). Evaluation of microbial culture of pooled faecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in large dairy herds. Am. J. Vet. Res., 65: 1061-1070.10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1061
- Tavornpanich S., Muñoz-Zanzi C., Wells S., Raizman E., Carpenter T., John- son W., Gardner I. (2008). Simulation model for evaluation of testing strategies for detection of paratuberculosis in midwestern USdairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med., 83: 65-82.
- Toribio J., Sergeant E. (2007). Acomparison of methods to estimate the prevalence of ovine Johne’s infection from pooled faecal samples. Aust. Vet. J., 85: 317-324.
- Weber M. (2006). Risk management of paratuberculosis in dairy herds. Ir. Vet. J., 59: 555-561.
- Wells S., Whitlock R., Wagner B., Collins J., Garry F., Hirst H., Lawrence J., Saville W., Naugle A. (2002 a). Sensitivity of test strategies used in the Voluntary Johne’s Disease Herd Status Program for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection in dairy cattle herds. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 220: 1053-1057.
- Wells S., Whitlock R., Lindeman C., Fyock T. (2002 b). Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of pooled faecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Am. J. Vet. Res., 63: 1207-1211.10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1207
- Wells S., Godden S., Lindeman C., Collins J. (2003). Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of individual and pooled faecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 223: 1022-1025.
- Yokomizo Y., Yugi H., Merkal R. (1985). Amethod for avoiding false-positive reactions in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Japanese J. Vet. Sci., 47: 111-119.