References
- AOAC (2000). Official method 960.39, fat (crude) or ether extract in meat. In Official methods of analysis (17th ed., p. 2). Arlington, VA: Association of Analytical Chemists.
- Bahelka I., Oravcova M., Hanusova E., Demo P. (2011). The effect of sex and terminal sire line on carcass characteristics of pork belly. Arch. Tierzucht, 54: 264-270.
- Baulain U., Henning M., Tholen E., Wittmann W., Peschke A. (1998). Objective methods for estimation of the lean meat content of pig belly 2nd communication: Utilization of scans from MR-imaging. Zuchtungskunde, 70: 205-212.
- Branscheid W., Dobrowolski A. (1996). Accuracy of video image analysis - Assessment of joint value and lightness of pork. Fleischwirtschaft, 76, p. 1228.
- Branscheid W., Dobrowolski A., Horeth R. (1994). Investigations to the reliability of determination of the lean content in cooled pig carcasses. Arch. Tierzucht, 37: 121-131.
- Branscheid W., Horeth R., Dobrowolski A., Baulain U., Tholen E. (2004). Estimation of the carcass composition based on the combination of the video imaging analysis with other grading systems. Fleischwirtschaft, 84: 98-101.
- Engel B., Buist W.G., Walstra P., Olsen E., Daumas G. (2003). Accuracy of prediction of percentage lean meat and authorization of carcass measurement instruments: adverse effects of incorrect sampling of carcasses in pig classification. Anim. Sci., 76: 199-209.
- Engel B., Lambooij E., Buist W.G., Vereijken P. (2012). Lean meat prediction with HGP, CGMand CSB-Image-Meater, with prediction accuracy evaluated for different proportions of gilts, boars and castrated boars in the pig population. Meat Sci., 90: 338-344.
- Goenaga P., Lloveras M.R., Amendola C. (2008). Prediction of lean meat content in pork carcasses using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Fat-O-Meater in Argentina. Meat Sci., 79: 611-613.
- Hermesch S. (2008). Genetic relationships between composition of pork bellies and performance, carcase and meat quality traits. Animal, 2: 1178-1185.
- Judas M., Horeth R., Dobrowolski A. (2006). Computed tomography as an analytical method for pig carcasses. Fleischwirtschaft, 86: 102-105.
- Kolb R., Nitter G. (1993). Digitized ultrasonic images on live pigs for prediction of meat proportion in the belly. Zuchtungskunde, 65: 297-305.
- Marcoux M., Pomar C., Faucitano L., Brodeur C. (2007). The relationship between different pork carcass lean yield definitions and the market carcass value. Meat Sci., 75: 94-102.
- Person R.C., Mc Kenna D.R., Griffin D.B., Mc Keith F.K., Scanga J.A., Belk K.E., Smith G.C., Savell J.W. (2005). Benchmarking value in the pork supply chain: Processing characteristics and consumer evaluations of pork bellies of different thicknesses when manufactured into bacon. Meat Sci., 70: 121-131.
- Pfeiffer H., Brendel B., Vonlengerken G. (1993). Valuation of the quality of belly by pig. Arch. Tierzucht, 36: 397-407.
- Pulkrabek J., Pavlik J., Valis L., Vitek M. (2006). Pig carcass quality in relation to carcass lean meat proportion. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 51: 18-23.
- Schwerdtfeger R., Krieter J., Kalm E. (1993). Objective measurement of bellies. Fleischwirtschaft, 73: 93-96.
- Seifert H., Zimmermann P., Seifert G., Kumpfert L. (2002). Tissue differentiation of pork by way of ultrasonic measuring process - Method for an objective classification of belly quality. Fleischwirtschaft, 82: 100-103.
- Sonnichsen M., Dobrowolski A., Horeth R., Branscheid W. (2002). Commercial valuation of pig carcases by using Video Image Analysis. Fleischwirtschaft, 82: 98-101.
- Stupka R., Sprysl M., Pour M. (2004). Analysis of the formation of the belly in relation to sex. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 49: 64-70.
- Stupka R., Čitek J., Sprysl M., Okrouhla M., Kures D., Likar K. (2008). Effect of weight and sex on intramuscular fat amounts in relation to the formation of selected carcass cuts in pigs. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 53: 506-514.
- Tholen E., Peschke W., Baulain U., Schellander K. (1998). Objective methods for estimation of the lean meat content of pork belly 1st communication: Derivation of regression equations by using different carcass traits. Zuchtungskunde, 70: 196-204.
- Tholen E., Baulain U., Henning M.D., Schellander K. (2003). Comparison of different methods to assess the composition of pig bellies in progeny testing. J. Anim. Sci., 81: 1177-1184.
- Trusell K.A., Apple J.K., Yancey J.W.S., Johnson T.M., Galloway D.L., Stack- house R.J. (2011). Compositional and instrumental firmness variations within fresh pork bellies. Meat Sci., 88: 472-480.
- Tyra M., Szyndler-Nedza M., Eckert R. (2011). Possibilities of using ultrasonography in breeding work with pigs. Part III - estimation of carcass meat content using regression equations developed from ultrasonographic measurements. Ann. Anim. Sci., 11: 357-369.
- Uttaro B., Zawadski S. (2010). Prediction of pork belly fatness from the intact primal cut. Food Control, 21: 1394-1401.
- Valis L., Pulkrabek J., Pavlik J., Vitek M., Wolf J. (2005). Conformation and meatiness of pork belly. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 116-121.
- Walstra A.P., Merkus G.S.M. (1995). Procedure for assessment of the lean meat percentage as a consequence of the new EUreference dissection method in pig carcass classification. DLO-Research Institute for Animal Science and Health Research Branch, Zeist, the Netherlands, pp. 1-22.
- Zelenak L., Kormendy L., Vada-Kovacs M. (2004). The effect of different animal types on the prediction (calibration) equations used for pig carcass classification. J. Food Engin., 61: 431-437.