Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does the activity of producer group organizations improve the production of pigs? Cover

Does the activity of producer group organizations improve the production of pigs?

Annals of Animal Science
Volume 15 (2015): Issue 3 (July 2015)
By: Damian Knecht,  Anna Jankowska-Mąkosa and  Kamil Duziński  
Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. 2011/506/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 16 August 2011 amending Decision 2005/240/ECauthorising methods for grading pig carcasses in Poland. Act of 15 September 2000 about agricultural producer groups and their associations and other laws. Warszawa, Poland, pp. 1-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Anderson S. (2003). Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods. Ecol. Econ., 45: 331-339.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Antosik K., Ko ćwin- Podsiadło M. (2000). Pork market in Poland in the light of the data and the Standards of the European Union. In: Economic assessment of the quality of agricultural production against the standards of the European Union (in Polish). Akademia Podlaska, pp. 110-124.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Boguta W., Siekierski C. (2001). Agricultural producer groups asafactor in improving the production and marketing of agricultural products (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. SGGW, 43: 45-56.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Borecka A. (2004). Integration of pig producers asafactor of profitability (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. Prz. Hod., 72: 232.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Defaix G. (1997). Producer organizations from protected agriculture to contract. Agricultural Information Service (in Polish). Ambasada Republiki Francuskiejw Polsce & BDPA. Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Donnellan T., Chantreuil F., Erjavec E., Esposti R., Hanrahan K.F.,van Leeu -wen M., Salamon P., Salputra G. (2012). EU Market Outlook. In: The Future of EU Agricultural Markets by AGMEMOD. Springer Netherlands, pp. 77-96.10.1007/978-94-007-2291-0_4
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Eurostat (2012). Agriculture, fishery and forestry statistics. Main results - 2010-2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Games P.A., Howell J.F. (1976). Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal N’s and/or variances:a Monte Carlo study. Journal of Statistics Education, 1: 113-125.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Gibon A., Sibbald A.R., Flamant J.C., Lhoste P., Revilla R., Rubino R., S øren-sen J.T. (1999). Livestock farming systems research in Europe and its potential contribution for managing towards sustainability in livestock farming. Livest. Prod. Sci., 61: 121-137.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Go ł ębiowski B. (2009). Partnership asamodel of vertical links farms to processing (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk Rol. Seria G, 94: 302-310.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Gonet D. (1997). New forms of co-operative activities in terms of transformation of the food economy (in Polish). In: Rural cooperatives in the perspective of integration with the European Union. T. II. SIB. Zakopane, pp. 39-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. G órniak J., Wachnicki J. (2004). First step in data analysis - SPSSfor Windows (in Polish). SPSS Polska, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. GUS - Central Statistical Office (2011). Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland, GUS, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Guzewicz W., Osuch D., Zdzieborska M. (2004). The results of the economic production of large-scale farms arising on the assets of the former state farms in 2000-2003 and plans for 2004 (in Polish). IERi GŻ, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Jankowska- Dymet A., Piasecka J. (2005). Producer groups -achance for Polish farmers (in Polish). Pr. Kom. Nauk Rol. Biol., XLIII, Bydgoszcz, pp. 223-230.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Jensen T.B., Baadsgaard N.P., Houe H., Toft N., Østergaard S. (2008). The association between disease and profitability in individual finishing boars atatest station. Livest. Sci., 117: 101-108.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. J ó źwiak W. (2000). Overview of the agribusiness sector output in Poland taking into account the trends in agricultural policy. In: Strategic options for the Polish agribusiness sector in the light of economic analysis. SGGW, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Knecht D., Duzi ński K. (2014). The effect of parity and date of service on the reproductive performance of Polish Large White × Polish Landrace (PLW×PL) crossbred sows. Ann. Anim. Sci., 14: 69-79.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Knecht D., Środo ń S. (2013). Analysis of activity in swine producers group based on agricultural producers association in Biała district. J. Agribus. Rural Dev., 1: 107-117.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Knecht D., Janczak M., Bodkowski R. (2007). Improvement of slaughter material quality thanks to cooperation between producer groups and meat plants. Anim. Sci., 1: 66-67.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Knecht D., Jankowska A., Zale śny G. (2012). The impact of gastrointestinal parasites infection on slaughter efficiency in pigs. Vet. Parasitol., 184: 291-297.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Knoblauch L., Kisiel R. (2005). Integration processes in the pig meat sector using the example of producer groups from the area of north-eastern Polish (in Polish). UWM, Olsztyn.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Krystallis A., Barcellos M.D., K ügler J.A., Verbeke W., Grunert K.G. (2009). Attitudes of European citizens towards pig production systems. Livest. Sci., 126: 46-56.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Kuku ła K. (2007). On the issue of research on agrarian structure in Poland in spatial terms (in Polish). Acta Sci. Pol. Oeconomia, 6: 19-27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Lamarche H. (1994). Les logiques productives. L’agriculture familiale: comparaison internacional. II Du mythe à la réalité, Paris, L’Harmattan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Malarska A. (2005). Statistical analysis of the data supported by the program SPSS (in Polish). SPSS Polska, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Ordinance of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, 15 February 2010 on the requirements and how to proceed while maintaining livestock species for which protection standards are provisions of the European Union.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Ostasiewicz S., Rusnak Z., Siedlecka U. (1998). Statistics - elements of the theory and tasks (in Polish). AE Wrocław.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Pepliński B. (2013). Impact of the profitability of pig production on changes in the pig population in Poland. Regional analysis. Rocz. Ekon. Rol. Rozwoju Wsi Obszarów Wiejskich, 100: 75-77.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Pepliński B., Wajszczuk K. (2003). Vertical integration - way to correct yield of pork production (in Polish). Pr. Nauk. AE Wrocław, 980: 421-426.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Polish Swine Nutrition Requirements. (1993). The Kielanowski Institute Animal Physiology and Nutrition.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Polish Academy of Sciences, Omnitech-Press, Warsaw, Poland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Rekiel A., Wiecek J., Wojtasik M., Ptak J., Blicharski T., Mroczko L. (2012). Effect of sex ratio in the litter in which Polish Large White and Polish Landrace sows were born on the number of piglets born and reared. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12: 179-185.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Roessler R., Drucker A.G., Scarpa R., Markemann A., Lemke E., Thuy L.E., Val-le - Z árate A. (2008). Using choice experiments to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for pig breeding traits in different production systems in North-West Vietnam. Ecol. Econ., 66: 184-189.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Roessler R., Herold P., Willam A., Piepho H.P., Thuy L.T., Valle- Z árate A. (2009). Modelling ofarecording scheme for market-oriented smallholder pig producers in Northwest Vietnam. Livest. Sci., 123: 241-248.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Skar żyńska A. (2011). The scale of production of agricultural production activities and their costeffectiveness (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk Rol. Seria G, 98: 7-21.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Skar żyńska A., Augustyńska- Grzymek I. (2001). Unit costs and profitability of agricultural production on private farms in 2000 (in Polish). Zagad. Ekon. Rol., 4-5: 79-137.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Skiba G., Raj S., Po ławska E., Pastuszewska B., Elminowska - Wenda G., Bogu -cka J., Knecht D. (2012). Profile of fatty acids, muscle structure and shear force of musculus longissimus dorsi (MLD) in growing pigs as affected by energy and protein or protein restriction followed by realimentation. Meat Sci., 91: 339-346.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Szczebiot- Knoblauch L. (2005). The formation of producer groups asamanifestation of rural entrepreneurship, competiveness, labor market and its entity (in Polish). Katedra Mikroekonomii US, Szczecin, pp. 237-241.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Šprysl M., Čitek J., Stupka R. (2010). Interaction of selected production indicators of the economics of pork production. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 55: 1-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Tereszkiewicz K., Ruda M., Dungin - Mugler C. (2001). Meatiness and carcass weight of finishing pigs produced in different regions of Poland (in Polish). Trz. Chlewna, 39: 52-53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Udo H.M.J., Aklilu H.A., Phong L.T., Bosma R.H., Budisatria I.G.S., Patil B.R., Sam-dup T., Bebe B.O. (2011). Impact of intensification of different types of livestock production in smallholder crop-livestock system. Livest. Sci., 139: 22-29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Urban R. (2002). Analysis of comparative advantages at the level of agri-food industry (in Polish). IERi GŻ, Warszawa, p. 53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Wilcox R.R. (2003). Applying Contemporary Statistical Techniques. Academic Press, San Diego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Wysoki ńska A., Kondracki S. (2014). Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two-breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann. Anim. Sci., 14: 559-571.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. ZSRIR (2011). Integrated agricultural market information system. Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Warsaw, Poland.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2015-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 759 - 774
Submitted on: Sep 16, 2014
Accepted on: Mar 4, 2015
Published on: Jul 29, 2015
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
integration,
agricultural producer groups,
pigs,
production parameters
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Biotechnology,
Zoology,
Medicine,
Veterinary medicine

© 2015 Damian Knecht, Anna Jankowska-Mąkosa, Kamil Duziński, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 15 (2015): Issue 3 (July 2015)Next article