Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development of ZP Method for Seurop Pig Carcass Grading in Poland Cover

Development of ZP Method for Seurop Pig Carcass Grading in Poland

Open Access
|Oct 2015

References

  1. Blicharski T., Borzuta K., Ostrowski A., Lisiak D., Strzelecki J. (2002). Ultra Fom 300 -anew device for assessing the meat percentage in pig carcasses (in Polish). Pr. Mat. Zoot. Zesz. Spec., 13: 17-22.
  2. Blicharski T., Żak G., Pierzchała M., Eckert R. (2003). Preliminary studies on possibility of estimating pig belly lean percentage based on slaughter traits measured atameat plant. Ann. Anim. Sci., 3: 333-344.
  3. Borzuta K. (1998). Studies on usefulness of different methods of meatiness evaluation for the classification of pork carcasses in the EUROPsystem (in Polish). Ann. Meat Fat Res. Inst., XXXV: 1-84.
  4. Borzuta K., Rasmussen M.K., Borys A., Lisiak D., Olsen E.V., Strzelecki J., Kien S., Winarski R., Piotrowski E., Grześkowiak E., Pospiech E. (2004). Elaboration of regression equations for estimation of pig carcass meatiness using Ultra-Fom 300 and CGMdevices. Rocz. Inst. Przem. Mięs. Tłusz., XLI: 95-108.
  5. Branscheid W., Dempfle L., Dobrowolski A., Sack E., Höreth R. (1990). Die Handelsklassen für Schweinehälften. Neue Wege der apparativen Klassifiezierung. Fleischwirtschaft, 70: 1428-1436.
  6. Branscheid W., Dobrowolski A., Höreth R. (1991). Klassifiezierung von Schweinehälften mit ultraschallgeräten. Fleischwirtschaft, 71: 760-762.
  7. Brøndum J., Jensen S.A. (1996). Carcass grading using the Auto Fom ultrasound system. 42nd ICo MST Lillehammer, Norway, Poster Proc., pp. 238-239.
  8. Causeur D., Daumas G., Dhorne T., Engel B., Font -i- Furnols M. (2006). Statistical handbook for assessing pig classification methods: Recommendations from EUPIGCLASSproject group. EUworking document.
  9. Commission Decision 506/UE (2011). Commission Implementing Decision of 16 August 2011amending Decision 2005/240/ECauthorising methods for grading pig carcasses in Poland. Official Journal of the European Union L 209/43.http://eurlex.europa.eu/Lex Uri Serv/Lex Uri Serv.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:2 09:0043:0048:EN:PDF (29.7.2013)
  10. Daumas G., Dhorne T. (1998). Pig carcass grading in European Union. Proc. 44th ICOMST Barcelona, Spain, pp. 946-947.
  11. Daumas G., Causeur D., Dhorne T., Schollhammer E. (1998). The new pig carcass grading methods in France. Proc. 44th ICOMST Barcelona, Spain, pp. 948-949.
  12. Dobrowolski A., Höreth R., Branscheid W. (1993). Apparative Klassifizierung von Schweinehälften. Kulmbacher Reihe Band., 12: 1-26.
  13. Engel B., Lambooij E.,. Buist W.G., Vereijken P. (2012). Lean meat prediction with HGP, CGMand CSB-Image-Meater, with prediction accuracy evaluated for different proportions of gilts, boars and castrated boars in the pig population. Meat Sci., 90: 338-344.
  14. European Community (2008). Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1249/2008. Laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and the reporting of prices thereof.
  15. Font -i- Furnols M., Gispert M. (2009). Comparison of different devices for predicting the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses. Meat Sci., 83: 443-446.
  16. Fortin A. (1989). Electronic grading of pig carcasses. The Canadian experience. Proc. EAAP Symposium: New Techniques on Pig Carcass Evaluation, Pudoc Wageningen Publ., 41: 75-85.
  17. Fortin A., Tong A.K.W., Robertson W.M. (2004). Evaluation of three ultrasound instruments, CVT-2, Ultra Fom 300 and Auto Fom for predicting saleable meat yield and weight of lean in the primal of pork carcasses. Meat Sci., 68: 537-549.
  18. Kempster A.J., Chadwick J.P., Jones D.W. (1985). An evaluation of the Hennessy grading probe and the SFK Fat-o-Meater for use in pig carcass classification and grading. Anim. Prod., 40: 323-329.
  19. Lisiak D., Borzuta K., Borys A., Strzelecki J., Rogalski J., Grześkowiak E. (2006). Elaboration of regression equation for the purpose of estimating meat content in pig carcasses with the help of Polish optical-needle probe IM-03. Offi. J. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci., 1, Suppl.: 81-82.
  20. Lisiak D., Borzuta K., Janiszewski P., Magda F., Grześkowiak E., Strzelecki J., Powałowski K., Lisiak B. (2012). Verification of regression equations for estimating pork carcass meatiness using CGM, IM-03, Fat-o-Meater and Ultra-Fom 300 devices. Ann. Anim. Sci., 12: 585-596.
  21. Olsen E.V., Candek-Potokar M., Oksama M., Kien S., Lisiak D., Busk H. (2007). On-line measurements in pig carcass classification: Repeatability and variation caused by the operator and the copy of instrument, Meat Sci., 75: 29-38.
  22. Schinckel A.P., Einstein M.E., Foster K., Craig B.A. (2007). Evaluation of the impact of errors in the measurement of backfat depth on the prediction of fat-free lean mass. J. Anim. Sci., 85: 2031-2042.
  23. Wajda S., Daszkiewicz T. (1997). Analize of preciseness of fat and m. longissimus dorsi thickness measure by caliper and ultrasound device. Proc. Polish-Slovak-Czech Science Conference.
  24. UWM, Olsztyn, 07.05.1997, p. 124.Winarski R., Wajda S., Boruta K. (2004). The use of longissimus dorsi muscle measurements in assessing meat content of pig carcasses. Primal Sci. Pap. Rep., 22: 575-585.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2015-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8733 | Journal ISSN: 1642-3402
Language: English
Page range: 987 - 996
Submitted on: Jun 25, 2013
Accepted on: Feb 13, 2015
Published on: Oct 29, 2015
Published by: National Research Institute of Animal Production
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Dariusz Lisiak, Karol Borzuta, Piotr Janiszewski, Eugenia Grześkowiak, Krzysztof Powałowski, Łukasz Samardakiewicz, Beata Lisiak, published by National Research Institute of Animal Production
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.