Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Case Report. Practical Advantages of CBCT in the Surgical Treatment of Impacted Lower Third Molar Cover

Case Report. Practical Advantages of CBCT in the Surgical Treatment of Impacted Lower Third Molar

Open Access
|Apr 2017

References

  1. 1. Carter K, Worthington S. Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016 Mar;95(3):267-76.10.1177/002203451561585726561441
  2. 2. Huang GJ, Cunha-Cruz J, Rothen M, Spiekerman C, Drangsholt M, Anderson L, Roset GA. A Prospective Study of Clinical Outcomes Related to Third Molar Removal or Retention. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(4):728-234.10.2105/AJPH.2013.301649402569924524521
  3. 3. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, The Management of Impacted Third Molar Teeth, 2013
  4. 4. Chandak S, Shetty CM - Comparative Study of Dentascan and Radiography for Radiological Evaluation of Impacted Teeth, J Clin Diagn Res, 2014, 8(7): RC01-RC05.10.7860/JCDR/2014/7997.4618414912625177620
  5. 5. Sansare K, Khanna V, Karjodkar - Early Victims of X-rays: a Tribute and Current Perception, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011, 40(2): 123-125.10.1259/dmfr/73488299352029821239576
  6. 6. Miles DA - Metoda Imagistică cu Fascicul Conic - “De ce Atâta Agitaţie în Legătură cu Doza de Radiaţii?”, Revista de Imagistică Dentară, 2010, 2: 14-22.
  7. 7. Matzen LH, Wenzel A - Efficacy of CBCT for Assessment of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: a Review - Based on a Hierarchical model of evidence, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2015, 44(1): 20140189.10.1259/dmfr.20140189427743725135317
  8. 8. Gonzalez SM - Interpretation Basics of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Wiley Blackwell, Iowa, 2014, 16-22.10.1002/9781119421177
  9. 9. de Melo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, de Oliveira e Silva ED, Holanda GZ. Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1030-37.10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.02016781335
  10. 10. Atieh MA. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:74-82.10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.07420006158
  11. 11. Koong B, Pharoah MJ, Bulsara M, Tennant M. Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral maxillofacial surgeons. Aust Dent J. 2006;51:64-68.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00403.x16669480
  12. 12. Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstruction to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1678-1685.10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.03218634957
  13. 13. Dodson TB. Role of computerized tomography in management of impacted mandibular third molars. N Y State Dent J. 2005 Nov
  14. 14. Bell GW. Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome. Brit J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42:21-2710.1016/S0266-4356(03)00186-4
  15. 15. Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:3-7.10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.21715635549
  16. 16. Tuzi A, Di Bari R, Cicconetti A. 3D imaging reconstruction and impacted third molars: case reports. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012 Jul-Dec; 3(3-4): 123-131.
  17. 17. Liu T, Xia B, Gu Z. Inferior alveolar canal course: a radiographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1212-121810.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01736.x19719735
  18. 18. Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Scheer M, Keeve E, Zoller JE. Comparison of cone beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol End. 2008;105:633-42.10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.04118299225
  19. 19. Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Review. Clin Oral Invest. 2008;12:291-30210.1007/s00784-008-0200-118446390
  20. 20. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Preoperative computed tomography imaging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:83-88.10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.05217174769
  21. 21. Suomalainen A, Esmaeili EP, Robinson S - Dentomaxillofacial Imaging with Panoramic Views and Cone Beam CT, Insights Imaging, 2015, 6(1): 1-16.10.1007/s13244-014-0379-4433023725575868
  22. 22. Pippi R. A case of inferior alveolar entrapment in the roots of a partially erupted mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1170-1173. 10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.00720185220
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amma-2017-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 45
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2016
|
Accepted on: Jan 16, 2017
|
Published on: Apr 20, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Alina Ormenișan, Alina Iacob, Daniel Szava, Balint Bogozi, Adina Coșarcă, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.