References
- 1. Bassiouny MA. & Grant AA. A visible light-cured composite restorative. Clinical open assessment. Br Dent J. 1978;145,327-30.
- 2. Santini A. Current status of visible light activation units and the curing of light- activated resin-based composite materials. Dent Update. 2010;37,214-227.
- 3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27,29-38.
- 4. Ferracane JL. Current Trends in Dental Composites. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine. 1995;6,302-318.
- 5. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 1997;105,97-116.
- 6. Asmussen E.& Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater DD. 1998.
- 7. da Silva EM., Poskus LT., Guimaraes JG., et al. Influence of light polymerisation modes on degree of conversion and crosslink density of dental composites. J Mater. 2008.
- 8. Cramer NB., Stansbury JW.& Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res. 2011;90,402-16.
- 9. Lohbauer U., Frankenberger R., Kramer N.& Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;76,114-20.
- 10. Turssi CP., Ferracane JL. & Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials. 2005;26,4932-7.
- 11. Willems G., Lambrechts P., Braem M., Celis JP. & Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater. 1992;8,310-9.
- 12. Gladys S., van Meerbeek B., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1997;76,883-94.
- 13. Arcis RW., Lopez-Macipe A., et al. Mechanical properties of visible light-cured resins reinforced with hydroxyapatite for dental restoration. Dent Mater. 2002;18.
- 14. Sim JS., Seol HJ., Park JK., et al. Interaction of LED light with co-initiator-containing composite resins: effect of dual peaks. J Dent. 2012;40,836-42.
- 15. Stansbury JW. Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerisation. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12,300-8.
- 16. Alvim HH., Alecio AC., Vasconcellos WA., et al. Analysis of camphorquinone in composite resins as a function of shade. Dent Mater. 2007;23,1245-9.
- 17. Shin DH.& Rawls HR. Degree of conversion and color stability of the light curing resin with new photoinitiator systems. Dent Mater. 2009;25,1030-8.
- 18. Park YJ., Chae KH. & Rawls HR. Development of a new photoinitiation system for dental light-cure composite resins. Dent Mater. 1999;15,120-7.
- 19. Abate PF., Zahra VN., Macchi RL. Effect of potopolymerisation variables on composite hardness. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86,632-5.
- 20. Asmussen E.& Peutzfeldt A. Influence of composition on rate of polymerisation contraction of light-curing resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60,146-50.
- 21. Neumann MG., Miranda WG., Jr. Schmitt CC., Rueggeberg FA.& Correa IC. Molar extinction coefficients and the photon absorption efficiency of dental photoinitiators and light curing units. J Dent. 2005;33,525-32.
- 22. Arikawa H., Kanie T., Fujii K., et al. Optical and color stabilities of paint-on resins for shade modification of restorative resins. Dent Mater J. 2004;23,155-60.
- 23. Emami N. & Soderholm KJ. How light irradiance and curing time affect monomer conversion in light-cured resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111, 536-42.
- 24. Arikawa H., Takahashi H., Kanie T. & Ban S. Effect of various visible light photoinitiators on the polymerisation and color of light-activated resins. Dent Mater J. 2009;28,454-60.
- 25. Ilie N. & Hickel R. Can CQ be completely replaced by alternative initiators in dental adhesives? Dent Mater J. 2008.;27,221-8.
- 26. Leprince JG., Hadis M., Shortall AC., et al. Photoinitiator type and applicability of exposure reciprocity law in filled and unfilled photoactive resins. Dent Mater. 2011;27,157-64.
- 27. Miletic V.& Santini A. Micro-Raman spectroscopic analysis of the degree of conversion of composite resins containing different initiators cured by polywave or monowave LED units. J Dent. 2012;40,106-13.
- 28. Emami N.& Soderholm KJ. Influence of light-curing procedures and photo- initiator/co-initiator composition on the degree of conversion of light- curing resins. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16,47-52.
- 29. Schneider LF., Pfeifer CS., Consani S., et al. Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerisation, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resincomposites. Dent Mater. 2008;24, 1169-77.
- 30. Bucuta S.& Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;1-10.
- 31. Bayne SC., Thompson JY., Swift EJ. Jr., Stamatiades P., Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129,567-77.
- 32. Ritter AV. Posterior composites revisited. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20,57-67.
- 33. Bonilla ED., Yashar M.& Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89,261-7.
- 34. Frankenberger R., Kramer N., Pelka M.& Petschelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3,208-15.
- 35. Ernst CP., Canbek K., Aksogan K.& Willershausen B. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7,129-34.
- 36. van Dijken JW. & Pallesen U. Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. Dent Mater. 2011;27,150-6.
- 37. Roggendorf MJ., Kramer N., Appelt A., Naumann Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011;39,643-7.
- 38. Brunthaler A., Konig F., Lucas T., Sperr W.& Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7,63-70.
- 39. Burke FJ., Mchugh S., Hall AC., et al 2003. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001. Br Dent J, 194, 613-8; discussion 609.
- 40. Lee MR., Cho BH., Son HH., Um CM. & Lee IB. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2007;23,288-95.
- 41. Palin WM., Senyilmaz DP., Marquis PM. & Shortall AC. Cure width potential for MOD resin composite molar restorations. Dent Mater. 2008;24,1083-94.
- 42. Knobloch LA., Kerby RE., Seghi R., Berlin JS. & Clelland N. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88,307-13.
- 43. Opdam NJ., Bronkhorst EM., Roeters JM.& Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23,2-8.
- 44. Beun S., Glorieux T., Devaux J., Vreven J.& Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater. 2007;23,51-9.
- 45. Feilzer AJ., de Gee AJ.& Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66,1636-9.
- 46. Caughman WF., Rueggeberg FA.& Curtis JW. Jr. Clinical guidelines for photocuring restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126,1280-2,1284,1286.
- 47. Price RB., Derand T., Loney R. W. & Andreou P. Effect of light source and specimen thickness on the surface hardness of resin composite. Am J Dent. 2002;15,47-53.
- 48. Pilo R., Oelgiesser D.& Cardash HS. A survey of output intensity and potential for depth of cure among light-curing units in clinical use. J Dent. 1999;27,235-41.
- 49. Koupis NS., Martens LC.& Verbeeck RM. Relative curing degree of polyacid-modified and conventional resin composites determined by surface Knoop hardness. Dent Mater. 2006;22,1045-50.
- 50. Flur YS., Hayoz S., Peutzfeldt A., Husler J.& Lussi A. Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater. 2012;28,521-8.
- 51. Abbas G., Fleming GJ., Harrington E., Shortall AC.& Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent. 2003;31,437-44.
- 52. Burgess J.& Cakir D. Comparative properties of low-shrinkage composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31SpecNo2,10-5.
- 53. Ilie N. & Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater. 2011;27, 348-55.
- 54. Jun SK., Kim DA., Goo HJ.& LEE HH. Investigation of the correlation between the different mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater J, 2013;32,48-57.
- 55. Christensen GJ. Advantages and Challenges of Bulk-Fill Resins. Clinicians Report.2012;5,1-2.
- 56. Safty S., Silikas N. & Watts DC. Creep deformation of restorative resincomposites intended for bulk-fill placement. Dent Mater, 2012;28,928-35.
- 57. Finan L., Palin WM., Moskwa N., Mcginley EL.& Fleming GJ. The influence of irradiation potential on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of two bulk-fill flowable RBC base materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29,no.8,906-912.
- 58. Ilie N., Kessler A.& Durner J. Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk fill resin based composites. J Dent. 2013;41,695-702.
- 59. Campodonico CE., Tantbirojn D., Olin PS. & Versluis A. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142,1176-82.
- 60. Czasch P.& Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17,227-35.
- 61. Alrahlah A., Silikas N. & Watts DC. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental resin-composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30,149-54.
- 62. Alshali RZ., Silikas N.& SATTERTHWAITE JD. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals. Dent Mater. 2013;29,e213-7.