Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Resin-Based Composite and LCU-related Factors Affecting the Degree of Cure. A Literature Review: Part 1. Resin-Based Composites Cover

Resin-Based Composite and LCU-related Factors Affecting the Degree of Cure. A Literature Review: Part 1. Resin-Based Composites

Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica
Volume 61 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Nov 2015
References

References

  1. 1. Bassiouny MA. & Grant AA. A visible light-cured composite restorative. Clinical open assessment. Br Dent J. 1978;145,327-30.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Santini A. Current status of visible light activation units and the curing of light- activated resin-based composite materials. Dent Update. 2010;37,214-227.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27,29-38.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Ferracane JL. Current Trends in Dental Composites. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine. 1995;6,302-318.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 1997;105,97-116.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Asmussen E.& Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater DD. 1998.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. da Silva EM., Poskus LT., Guimaraes JG., et al. Influence of light polymerisation modes on degree of conversion and crosslink density of dental composites. J Mater. 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Cramer NB., Stansbury JW.& Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res. 2011;90,402-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Lohbauer U., Frankenberger R., Kramer N.& Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;76,114-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Turssi CP., Ferracane JL. & Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials. 2005;26,4932-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Willems G., Lambrechts P., Braem M., Celis JP. & Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater. 1992;8,310-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Gladys S., van Meerbeek B., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1997;76,883-94.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Arcis RW., Lopez-Macipe A., et al. Mechanical properties of visible light-cured resins reinforced with hydroxyapatite for dental restoration. Dent Mater. 2002;18.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Sim JS., Seol HJ., Park JK., et al. Interaction of LED light with co-initiator-containing composite resins: effect of dual peaks. J Dent. 2012;40,836-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Stansbury JW. Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerisation. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12,300-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Alvim HH., Alecio AC., Vasconcellos WA., et al. Analysis of camphorquinone in composite resins as a function of shade. Dent Mater. 2007;23,1245-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Shin DH.& Rawls HR. Degree of conversion and color stability of the light curing resin with new photoinitiator systems. Dent Mater. 2009;25,1030-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Park YJ., Chae KH. & Rawls HR. Development of a new photoinitiation system for dental light-cure composite resins. Dent Mater. 1999;15,120-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Abate PF., Zahra VN., Macchi RL. Effect of potopolymerisation variables on composite hardness. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86,632-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Asmussen E.& Peutzfeldt A. Influence of composition on rate of polymerisation contraction of light-curing resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60,146-50.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Neumann MG., Miranda WG., Jr. Schmitt CC., Rueggeberg FA.& Correa IC. Molar extinction coefficients and the photon absorption efficiency of dental photoinitiators and light curing units. J Dent. 2005;33,525-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Arikawa H., Kanie T., Fujii K., et al. Optical and color stabilities of paint-on resins for shade modification of restorative resins. Dent Mater J. 2004;23,155-60.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Emami N. & Soderholm KJ. How light irradiance and curing time affect monomer conversion in light-cured resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111, 536-42.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Arikawa H., Takahashi H., Kanie T. & Ban S. Effect of various visible light photoinitiators on the polymerisation and color of light-activated resins. Dent Mater J. 2009;28,454-60.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Ilie N. & Hickel R. Can CQ be completely replaced by alternative initiators in dental adhesives? Dent Mater J. 2008.;27,221-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Leprince JG., Hadis M., Shortall AC., et al. Photoinitiator type and applicability of exposure reciprocity law in filled and unfilled photoactive resins. Dent Mater. 2011;27,157-64.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Miletic V.& Santini A. Micro-Raman spectroscopic analysis of the degree of conversion of composite resins containing different initiators cured by polywave or monowave LED units. J Dent. 2012;40,106-13.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Emami N.& Soderholm KJ. Influence of light-curing procedures and photo- initiator/co-initiator composition on the degree of conversion of light- curing resins. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16,47-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Schneider LF., Pfeifer CS., Consani S., et al. Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerisation, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resincomposites. Dent Mater. 2008;24, 1169-77.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Bucuta S.& Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;1-10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Bayne SC., Thompson JY., Swift EJ. Jr., Stamatiades P., Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129,567-77.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Ritter AV. Posterior composites revisited. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20,57-67.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Bonilla ED., Yashar M.& Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89,261-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Frankenberger R., Kramer N., Pelka M.& Petschelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3,208-15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Ernst CP., Canbek K., Aksogan K.& Willershausen B. Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7,129-34.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. van Dijken JW. & Pallesen U. Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. Dent Mater. 2011;27,150-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Roggendorf MJ., Kramer N., Appelt A., Naumann Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011;39,643-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Brunthaler A., Konig F., Lucas T., Sperr W.& Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7,63-70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Burke FJ., Mchugh S., Hall AC., et al 2003. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001. Br Dent J, 194, 613-8; discussion 609.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Lee MR., Cho BH., Son HH., Um CM. & Lee IB. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2007;23,288-95.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Palin WM., Senyilmaz DP., Marquis PM. & Shortall AC. Cure width potential for MOD resin composite molar restorations. Dent Mater. 2008;24,1083-94.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Knobloch LA., Kerby RE., Seghi R., Berlin JS. & Clelland N. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88,307-13.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Opdam NJ., Bronkhorst EM., Roeters JM.& Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23,2-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Beun S., Glorieux T., Devaux J., Vreven J.& Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater. 2007;23,51-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Feilzer AJ., de Gee AJ.& Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66,1636-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Caughman WF., Rueggeberg FA.& Curtis JW. Jr. Clinical guidelines for photocuring restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126,1280-2,1284,1286.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 47. Price RB., Derand T., Loney R. W. & Andreou P. Effect of light source and specimen thickness on the surface hardness of resin composite. Am J Dent. 2002;15,47-53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Pilo R., Oelgiesser D.& Cardash HS. A survey of output intensity and potential for depth of cure among light-curing units in clinical use. J Dent. 1999;27,235-41.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Koupis NS., Martens LC.& Verbeeck RM. Relative curing degree of polyacid-modified and conventional resin composites determined by surface Knoop hardness. Dent Mater. 2006;22,1045-50.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. 50. Flur YS., Hayoz S., Peutzfeldt A., Husler J.& Lussi A. Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater. 2012;28,521-8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. 51. Abbas G., Fleming GJ., Harrington E., Shortall AC.& Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent. 2003;31,437-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 52. Burgess J.& Cakir D. Comparative properties of low-shrinkage composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31SpecNo2,10-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 53. Ilie N. & Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater. 2011;27, 348-55.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. 54. Jun SK., Kim DA., Goo HJ.& LEE HH. Investigation of the correlation between the different mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater J, 2013;32,48-57.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. 55. Christensen GJ. Advantages and Challenges of Bulk-Fill Resins. Clinicians Report.2012;5,1-2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. 56. Safty S., Silikas N. & Watts DC. Creep deformation of restorative resincomposites intended for bulk-fill placement. Dent Mater, 2012;28,928-35.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. 57. Finan L., Palin WM., Moskwa N., Mcginley EL.& Fleming GJ. The influence of irradiation potential on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of two bulk-fill flowable RBC base materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29,no.8,906-912.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. 58. Ilie N., Kessler A.& Durner J. Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk fill resin based composites. J Dent. 2013;41,695-702.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. 59. Campodonico CE., Tantbirojn D., Olin PS. & Versluis A. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142,1176-82.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. 60. Czasch P.& Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17,227-35.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. 61. Alrahlah A., Silikas N. & Watts DC. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental resin-composites. Dent Mater. 2014;30,149-54.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. 62. Alshali RZ., Silikas N.& SATTERTHWAITE JD. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals. Dent Mater. 2013;29,e213-7.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amma-2015-0126 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 (formerly 2247-6113) | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 153 - 157
Submitted on: Aug 8, 2015
Accepted on: Sep 15, 2015
Published on: Nov 7, 2015
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
polymerisation,
bisphenol-A-glycidyl methacrylate,
ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other

© 2015 Aldossary Mohammed, Santini Ario, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)
Next article