Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Medical Students’ Acceptance of Online Assessment Systems Cover

Medical Students’ Acceptance of Online Assessment Systems

Open Access
|Feb 2016

References

  1. 1. Wang TH.Implementation of Web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics.Computers & Education. 2011;56:1062-1071.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.014
  2. 2. Wang TH. Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students’ e-learning effectiveness. Computers & Education. 2010;54:1157-1166.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.001
  3. 3. Wang TH. Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: Development and evaluation. Computers & Education. 2008;51:1247-1263.10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.011
  4. 4. Llamas-Nistal M, Fernández-Iglesias MJ, González-Tato J, Mikic-Fonte FJ. Blended e-assessment: Migrating classical exams to the digital world. Computers & Education. 2013;62:72-87.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.021
  5. 5. Petrişor M, Măruşteri M, Ghiga D, Şchiopu A. Online Assessment System. Applied Medical Informatics. 2011;28:23-28.
  6. 6. Ventouras E, TriantisD, Tsiakas P, Stergiopoulos, C. Comparison of examination methods based on multiple-choice questions and constructed-response questions using personal computers. Computers & Education. 2010;54:455-461.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.028
  7. 7. Lee JW. Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education. 2010;13:277-28310.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002
  8. 8. Grieve R, Padgett CR, Moffitt RL.Assignments 2.0: The role of social presence and computer attitudes in student preferences for online versus offline marking. Internet and Higher Education. 2016;28:8-1610.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.002
  9. 9. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Airasian PW, et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson, Allyn& Bacon, New York. 2001
  10. 10. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63-6710.1097/00001888-199009000-000452400509
  11. 11. Struyven K, Dochy F, Janssens S. Students’ perception about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education.2005;30:325-341.10.1080/02602930500099102
  12. 12. Furnham A, Christopher A, Garwood J, Martin N. Ability, demography, learning style and personality trait correlates of student preferences for assessment method. Educational Psychology. 2008;28:15-27.10.1080/01443410701369138
  13. 13. Dascalu CG, Enache AM, Mavru RB, Zegan G. Computer-based MCQ Assessment for Students in Dental Medicine - Advantages and Drawbacks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;187:22-27.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amma-2015-0110 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Language: English
Page range: 30 - 32
Submitted on: Aug 7, 2015
|
Accepted on: Sep 14, 2015
|
Published on: Feb 9, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Marius Petrisor, Marius Marusteri, Dan Simpalean, Emilian Carasca, Dana Ghiga, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.