Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pancreatico-Gastric Anastomosis with and without Sutures – Experimental Swine Model Cover

Pancreatico-Gastric Anastomosis with and without Sutures – Experimental Swine Model

Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica
Volume 61 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
By: A Tudor,  C Molnar,  C Copotoiu,  VO Butiurca,  C Nicolescu,  Tudor Bianca and  Gurzu Simona  
Open Access
|Aug 2015

References

  1. 1. Allema JH, Reinders ME, van Gulik TM, Koelemay MJ, Van Leeuwen DJ, de Wilt LT, et al. Prognostic factors for survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head region. Cancer, 1995;75:2069-2076.10.1002/1097-0142(19950415)75:8<2069::AID-CNCR2820750807>3.0.CO;2-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg, 1993;217:430–435.10.1097/00000658-199305010-00002
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA, Nagorney DM, McIlrath DC, Ilstrup D. Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: current management. Arch Surg, 1992;127:945–949.10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420080079012
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Haddad LBP, Scatton O, Randone B, Andraus W, Massault P, Dousset B, Soubrane O. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the conservative treatment of choice. HPB (Oxford), 2009;11:203–209.10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00007.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E, Scopelliti F, Casarotto A, Bassi C. Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15: 247–251.10.1007/s00534-007-1301-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Akamatsu, N., Sugawara, Y., Komagome, M., Shin, N., Cho, N., Ishida, T., Ozawa, F. and Hashimoto, D. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Panc, 2010;17:322–328.10.1007/s00534-009-0248-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Falconi M, Pederzoli P. The relevance of gastrointestinal fistulae in clinical practice: a review. Gut, 2001; 49 (Suppl 4): iv2–iv10.10.1136/gut.49.suppl_4.iv2
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg, 1997;226:248-260.10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Scurtu R, Lucescu I, Oshita A, Jaeck D. Pancreatogastrostomy as a Salvage Procedure to Treat Severe Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg, 2008;143:966-970.10.1001/archsurg.143.10.966
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Zhu F, Wang M, Wang X, Tian R, Shi C, Xu M, Shen M, Han J, Luo N, Qin R. Modified Technique of Pancreaticogastrostomy for Soft Pancreas with Two Continuous Hemstitch Sutures: A Single-Center Prospective Study. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013;17:1306–1311.10.1007/s11605-013-2183-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P: Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg, 2005;242:767–771.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Niedergethmann M, Dusch N, Widyaningsih R, Weiss C, Kienle P, Post S: Risk-adapted anastomosis for partial pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula: a pilot study. World J Surg, 2010;34:1579–1586.10.1007/s00268-010-0521-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Lopez-Boado MA, Astudillo E: Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg, 2008;248:930–938.10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818fefc7
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Aranha GV, Hodul P, Golts E, Oh D, Pickleman J, Creech S. A comparison of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2003;7:672–682.10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00432-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Annals of Surgery, 2005;242:767–773.10.1097/01.sla.0000189124.47589.6d
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Bartsch DK, Langer P, Kanngiesser V, Fendrich V, Dietzel K: A simple and safe anastomosis for pancreatogastrostomy using one binding purse-string and two transfixing mattress sutures. Int J Surg Oncol, 2012:718637.10.1155/2012/718637
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Adams DB: The pancreatic anastomosis: the danger of a leak, which anastomotic technique is better? J Gastrointest Surg, 2009;13:1182–1183.10.1007/s11605-009-0865-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Mantovani W, Butturini G, Gumbs AA, Salvia R, Pederzoli P: Duct-to-mucosa versus endto-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery, 2003; 134:766–771.10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00345-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H, et al: Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dualinstitution trial. J Am Coll Surg, 2009;208:738–747.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.03119476827
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA: One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg, 2006;244:10–15.10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea157059016794383
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Su CH, Shyr YM, Lui WY, P’eng FK. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Hepatogastroenterology, 1999; 46:1973-1979.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Pellegrini CA, Heck CF, Raper S, Way LW. An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreati-coduodenectomy. Arch Surg, 1989;124:778–781.10.1001/archsurg.1989.014100700280062742478
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Ming-Dong Bai, Liang-Qun Rong, Lian-Chen Wang, Hai Xu, Rui-Fang Fan, Pei Wang, Xiao-Peng Chen, Liu-Bin Shi, and Shu-You Peng. Experimental study on operative methods of pancreaticojejunostomy with reference to anastomotic patency and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function. World J Gastroenterol, 2008; 14:441–447.10.3748/wjg.14.441
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Hamanaka Y, Nishihara K, Hamasaki T, Kawabata A, Yamamoto S, Tsurumi M, Ueno T, Suzuki T. Pancreatic juice output after pancreatoduodenectomy in relation to pancreatic consistency, duct size, and leakage. Surgery, 1996;119:281-287.10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80114-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Yeo CJ, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg, 1995;222:580-592.10.1097/00000658-199510000-0001412348947574936
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Duffas JP, et al. A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg, 2005;189:720-729.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.01515910726
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Peng SY, et al. A pancreas suture-less type II binding pancreaticogastrostomy. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery], 2009; 47:1764-1766.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amma-2015-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2668-7763 | Journal ISSN: 2668-7755
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 105 - 109
Submitted on: Apr 1, 2015
|
Accepted on: May 1, 2015
|
Published on: Aug 6, 2015
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
duodenopancreatectomy,
pancreatic fistula,
pancreatico-gastric anastomosis,
double purse string
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other

© 2015 A Tudor, C Molnar, C Copotoiu, VO Butiurca, C Nicolescu, Tudor Bianca, Gurzu Simona, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 61 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)Next article