Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Modelling DNA and RNA secondary structures using matrix insertion–deletion systems Cover

Modelling DNA and RNA secondary structures using matrix insertion–deletion systems

Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. Boullier, P. and Sagot, B. (2011). Multi-component tree insertion grammars,P. De Groote(Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 5591, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 31–46.
  2. Brendel, V. and Busse, H.G. (1984). Genome structure described by formal languages,(5): 2561–2568.
  3. Brown, M. and Wilson, C. (1995). RNA pseudoknot modelling using intersections of stochastic context free grammars with applications to database search,, pp. 109–125.
  4. Cai, L., Russell, L. and Wu, Y. (2003). Stochastic modelling of RNA pseudoknotted structures: A grammatical approach,(1): 66–73.
  5. Calude, C.S. and Paŭn, Gh. (2001)., Taylor and Francis, London.
  6. Chiang, D., Joshi, A.K. and Searls, D.B. (2006). Grammatical representations of macromolecular structure,(5): 1077–1100.
  7. Dong, S. and Searls, D.B. (1994). Gene structure prediction by linguistic methods,(3): 540–551.
  8. Dorigo, M. and Stutzle, T. (2004)., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  9. Durbin, R., Eddy, S., Krogh, A. and Mitchison, G. (1998)., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  10. Eiben, A.E. and Smith, J.E. (2003)., Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
  11. Galiukschov, B.S. (1981). Semicontextual grammars,: 38–50, (in Russian).
  12. Goldberg, E.D. (1989)., Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
  13. Haussler, D. (1982)., Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
  14. Haussler, D. (1983). Insertion languages,(1): 77–89.
  15. Head, T. (1987). Formal language theory and DNA: An analysis of the generative capacity of specific recombinant behaviors,(6): 737–750.
  16. Kuppusamy, L., Mahendran, A. and Krishna, S.N. (2011a). Matrix insertion–deletion systems for bio-molecular structures,R. Natarajan and A. Ojo (Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6536, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 301–311.
  17. Kuppusamy, L., Mahendran, A. and Clergerie, E.V. (2011b). Modelling intermolecular structures and defining ambiguity in gene sequences using matrix insertion–deletion systems in biology, computation and linguistics,G.B. Enguix(Eds.),, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 71–85.
  18. Lyngso, R.B., Zuker, M. and Pedersen, C.N.S. (1999). Internal loops in RNA secondary structure prediction,, pp. 260–267.
  19. Lyngso, R.B. and Pedersen, C.N.S. (2000). Pseudoknots in RNA secondary structure,pp. 201–209.
  20. Mamitsuka, H. and Abe, N. (1994). Prediction of beta-sheet structures using stochastic tree grammars,, pp. 19–28.
  21. Pardo, M.A.A., Clergerie, E.V. and Ferro, M.V. (1997). Automata-based parsing in dynamic programming for LIG,A.S. Narinyani (Ed.),, pp. 22–27.
  22. Păun, Gh., Rozenberg, G. and Salomaa, A. (1998)., Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
  23. Păun, Gh. (2002)., Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
  24. Petre, I. and Verlan, S. (2012). Matrix insertion–deletion systems,: 80–88.
  25. Rivas, E. and Eddy, S.R. (2000). The language of RNA: A formal grammar that includes pseudoknots,(4): 334–340.
  26. Rozenberg, G. and Salomaa, A. (1997)., Vol. 1, Springer, New York, NY.
  27. Sakakibara, Y., Brown, R., Hughey, R., Mian, I.S., Sjolander, K., Underwood, R.C. and Haussler, D. (1996). Stochastic context-free grammars for tRNA modelling,(23): 5112–5120.
  28. Sakakibara, Y. (2003). Pair hidden Markov models on tree structures,(1): 232–240.
  29. Searls, D.B. (1988). Representing genetic information with formal grammars,, pp. 386–391.
  30. Searls, D.B. (1992). The linguistics of DNA,(6): 579–591.
  31. Searls, D.B. (1993). The computational linguistics of biological sequences,L. Hunter (Ed.),, AAAI Press, Paolo Alto, CA, pp. 47–120.
  32. Searls, D.B. (1995). Formal grammars for intermolecular structures,, pp. 30–37.
  33. Searls, D.B. (2002). The language of genes,(6912): 211–217.
  34. Theis, C., Janssen, S. and Giegerich, R. (2010). Prediction of RNA secondary structure including kissing hairpin motifs,, pp. 52–64.
  35. Uemura, Y, Hasegawa, A., Kobayashi, S. and Yokomori, T. (1999). Tree adjoining grammars for RNA structure prediction,(2): 277–303.
  36. Yuki, S. and Kasami, T. (2006). RNA pseudoknotted structure prediction using stochastic multiple context-free grammar,: 12–21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2016-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 245 - 258
Submitted on: Aug 8, 2014
Published on: Mar 31, 2016
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Lakshmanan Kuppusamy, Anand Mahendran, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.