Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The performance profile: A multi–criteria performance evaluation method for test–based problems Cover

The performance profile: A multi–criteria performance evaluation method for test–based problems

Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. Ashlock, D. and Lee, C. (2013). Agent-case embeddings for the analysis of evolved systems,(2): 227–240.
  2. Axelrod, R. (1984)., Basic Books, New York, NY.
  3. Beyer, H.-G. and Schwefel, H.-P. (2002). Evolution strategies—a comprehensive introduction,(1): 3–52.
  4. Bucci, A., Pollack, J.B. and de Jong, E. (2004). Automated extraction of problem structure,K. Deb(Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 501–512.
  5. Chong, S.Y., Tiño, P., Ku, D.C. and Xin, Y. (2012). Improving generalization performance in co-evolutionary learning,(1): 70–85.
  6. Chong, S.Y., Tiño, P. and Yao, X. (2008). Measuring generalization performance in coevolutionary learning,(4): 479–505.
  7. Chong, S.Y., Tiño, P. and Yao, X. (2009). Relationship between generalization and diversity in coevolutionary learning,(3): 214–232.
  8. Chong, S.Y. and Yao, X. (2005). Behavioral diversity, choices and noise in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma,(6): 540–551.
  9. Darwen, P.J. and Yao, X. (2001). Why more choices cause less cooperation in iterated prisoner’s dilemma,, Vol. 2, pp. 987–994.
  10. Darwen, P. and Yao, X. (2000). Does extra genetic diversity maintain escalation in a co-evolutionary arms race,(3): 191–200.
  11. de Jong, E.D. (2004). The incremental Pareto-coevolution archive,K. Deb(Ed.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 525–536.
  12. Ficici, S.G. (2004)., Ph.D. thesis, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
  13. Fogel, D.B. (1991). The evolution of intelligent decision making in gaming,(2): 223–236.
  14. Fogel, D.B. (2001)., Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
  15. Frean, M. (1996). The evolution of degrees of cooperation,(4): 549–59.
  16. Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A. (2000). A simple adaptive procedure leading to correlated equilibrium,(5): 1127–1150.
  17. Hillis, W.D. (1990). Co-evolving parasites improve simulated evolution as an optimization procedure,(1–3): 228–234.
  18. Jaśkowski, W. (2011)., Ph.D. thesis, Poznań University of Technology, Poznań.
  19. Jaśkowski, W. (2014). Systematic-tuple networks for Othello position evaluation,(2): 85–96.
  20. Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2011). How many dimensions in cooptimization?,N. Krasnogor (Ed.),, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 829–830.
  21. Jaśkowski, W., Krawiec, K. and Wieloch, B. (2008). Evolving strategy for a probabilistic game of imperfect information using genetic programming,(4): 281–294.
  22. Jaśkowski, W., Liskowski, P., Szubert, M. and Krawiec, K. (2013). Improving coevolution by random sampling,C. Blum (Ed.),, ACM, Amsterdam, pp. 1141–1148.
  23. Jaśkowski, W., Szubert, M. and Liskowski, P. (2014). Multi-criteria comparison of coevolution and temporal difference learning on Othello,A.I. Esparcia-Alcazar and A.M. Mora (Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8602, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 301–312.
  24. Juillé, H. and Pollack, J.B. (1998). Coevolving the ideal trainer: Application to the discovery of cellular automata rules,, pp. 519–527.
  25. Knowles, J.D., Watson, R.A. and Corne, D. (2001). Reducing local optima in single-objective problems by multi-objectivization,, pp. 269–283.
  26. Krawiec, K., Jaśkowski, W. and Szubert, M. (2011). Evolving small-board go players using coevolutionary temporal difference learning with archive,(4): 717–731, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-011-0057-3.
  27. Lucas, S.M. (2007). Learning to play Othello with-tuple systems,(4): 1–20.
  28. Lucas, S.M. and Runarsson, T.P. (2006). Temporal difference learning versus co-evolution for acquiring Othello position evaluation,, pp. 52–59.
  29. Luke, S. and Wiegand, R.P. (2002). When coevolutionary algorithms exhibit evolutionary dynamics,A.M. Barry (Ed.),, AAAI, New York, NY, pp. 236–241.
  30. Manning, E.P. (2010). Using resource-limited Nash memory to improve an Othello evaluation function,(1): 40–53.
  31. Nolfi, S. and Floreano, D. (1998). Coevolving predator and prey robots: Do “Arms races” arise in artificial evolution?,(4): 311–335.
  32. Pollack, J.B. and Blair, A.D. (1998). Co-evolution in the successful learning of backgammon strategy,(3): 225–240.
  33. Popovici, E., Bucci, A., Wiegand, R.P. and de Jong, E.D. (2011). Coevolutionary principles,G. Rozenberg(Eds.),, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 987–1033.
  34. Popovici, E. and De Jong, K. (2009). Monotonicity versus performance in co-optimization,, pp. 151–170.
  35. Poundstone, W. (1992)., Doubleday, NY.
  36. Reynolds, C. (1994). Competition, coevolution and the game of tag,R.A. Brooks and P. Maes (Eds.),, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 59–69.
  37. Runarsson, T. and Lucas, S. (2014). Preference learning for move prediction and evaluation function approximation in Othello,(3): 300–313.
  38. Samothrakis, S., Lucas, S., Runarsson, T. and Robles, D. (2012). Coevolving game-playing agents: Measuring performance and intransitivities,(2): 1–15.
  39. Szubert, M., Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2009). Coevolutionary temporal difference learning for Othello,, pp. 104–111.
  40. Szubert, M., Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2011). Learning board evaluation function for Othello by hybridizing coevolution with temporal difference learning,(3): 805–831.
  41. Szubert, M., Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2013a). On scalability, generalization, and hybridization of coevolutionary learning: A case study for Othello,(3): 214–226.
  42. Szubert, M., Liskowski, P., Jaśkowski, W. and Krawiec, K. (2013b). Shaping fitness function for evolutionary learning of game strategies,C. Blum (Ed.),, ACM, Amsterdam, pp. 1149–1156.
  43. Szubert, M., Jaśkowski, W., Liskowski, P. and Krawiec, K. (2015). The role of behavioral diversity and difficulty of opponents in coevolving game-playing agents,M.A. Mora and G. Squilero (Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9028, Springer, pp. 394–405.
  44. Watson, R.A. and Pollack, J.B. (2001). Coevolutionary dynamics in a minimal substrate,, pp. 702–709.
  45. Yoshioka, T., Ishii, S. and Ito, M. (1998). Strategy acquisition for the game ”Othello” based on reinforcement learning,S. Usui and T. Omori (Eds.),, IOA Press, Kitakyushu, pp. 841–844.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2016-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 215 - 229
Submitted on: Feb 13, 2015
Published on: Mar 31, 2016
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Wojciech Jaśkowski, Paweł Liskowski, Marcin Szubert, Krzysztof Krawiec, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.