Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
High Dynamic Range Imaging by Perceptual Logarithmic Exposure Merging Cover

High Dynamic Range Imaging by Perceptual Logarithmic Exposure Merging

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Volume 25 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2015
References

References

  1. Aydin, T., Mantiuk, R., Myszkowski, K. and Seidel, H. (2008). Dynamic range independent image quality assessment,(3): 1–10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Banterle, F., Artusi, A., Debattista, K. and Chalmers, A. (2011)., AK Peters (CRC Press), Natick, MA.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Banterle, F., Artusi, A., Sikudova, E., Edward, T., Bashford-Rogers, W., Ledda, P., Bloj, M. and Chalmers, A. (2012). Dynamic range compression by differential zone mapping based on psychophysical experiments,, pp. 39–46.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Barten, P.G.J. (1999)., SPIE, Washington, DC.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Bruce, N.D. (2014). Expoblend: Information preserving exposure blending based on normalized log-domain entropy,: 12–23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Čadík, M., Wimmer, M., Neumann, L. and Artusi, A. (2008). Evaluation of HDR tone mapping methods using essential perceptual attributes,(3): 330–349.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Debevec, P. and Malik, J. (1997). Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs,, pp. 369–378.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Deng, G., Cahill, L.W. and Tobin, G.R. (1995). A study of logarithmic image processing model and its application to image enhancement,(4): 506–512.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Drago, F., Myszkowski, K., Annen, T. and Chiba, N. (2003). Adaptive logarithmic mapping for displaying high contrast scenes,(3): 419–426.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Durand, F. and Dorsey, J. (2002). Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images,(3): 257–266.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Fattal, R., Lischinski, D. and Werman, M. (2002). Gradient domain high dynamic range compression,(3): 249–256.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Ferradans, S., Bertalmio, M., Provenzi, E. and Caselles, V. (2012). An analysis of visual adaptation and contrast perception for tone mapping,(10): 2002–2012.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Florea, C. and Florea, L. (2013). Parametric logarithmic type image processing for contrast based auto-focus in extreme lighting conditions,(3): 637–648, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2013-0048.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Gilchrist, A., Kossyfidis, C., Bonato, F., Agostini, T., Cataliotti, J., Li, X., Spehar, B., Annan, V. and Economou, E. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception,(4): 795–834.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Grossberg, M.D. and Nayar, S.K. (2004). Modeling the space of camera response functions,(10): 1272–1282.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Jourlin, M. and Pinoli, J.C. (1987). Logarithmic image processing,: 651–656.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Krawczyk, G., Myszkowski, K. and Seidel, H.-P. (2005). Lightness perception in tone reproduction for high dynamic range images,(3): 635–645.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Macmillan, N. and Creelman, C. (Eds.) (2005)., Lawrence Erlbaum, London.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Mann, S. and Mann, R. (2001). Quantigraphic imaging: Estimating the camera response and exposures from differently exposed images,, Vol. 1, pp. 842–849.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Mann, S. and Picard, R. (1995). Being ‘undigital’ with digital cameras: Extending dynamic range by combining differently exposed pictures,, Vol. 1, pp. 422–428.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Marković, D. and Jukić, D. (2013). On parameter estimation in the bass model by nonlinear least squares fitting the adoption curve,(1): 145–155, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2013-0012.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Mertens, T., Kautz, J. and Reeth, F.V. (2007). Exposure fusion,, pp. 382–390.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Meylan, L., Alleysson, D. and Susstrunk, S. (2007). Model of retinal local adaptation for the tone mapping of color filter array images,(9): 2807–2816.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Naka, K.-I. and Rushton, W.A.H. (1966). S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (cyprinidae),(3): 587–599.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Navarro, L., Courbebaisse, G. and Deng, G. (2013). The symmetric logarithmic image processing model,(5): 1337–1343.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Panetta, K., Zhou, Y., Agaian, S. and Wharton, E. (2011). Parameterized logarithmic framework for image enhancement,(2): 460–472.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Patrascu, V. and Buzuloiu, V. (2001). Color image enhancement in the framework of logarithmic models,, Vol. 1, pp. 199–204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Pece, F. and Kautz, J. (2010). Bitmap movement detection: HDR for dynamic scenes,, pp. 1–8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Pinoli, J.C. and Debayle, J. (2007). Logarithmic adaptive neighborhood image processing (LANIP): Introduction, connections to human brightness perception, and application issues,: 114–114, Paper no. 036105.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Reinhard, E., Stark, M., Shirley, P. and Ferwerda, J. (2002). Photographic tone reproduction for digital images,(3): 267–276.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Reinhard, E., Ward, G., Pattanaik, S. and Debevec, P. (2005)., Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Robertson, M., Borman, S. and Stevenson, R. (1999). Dynamic range improvement through multiple exposures,, pp. 159–163.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Stevens, J. and Stevens, S. (1963). Brightness functions: Effects of adaptation,(3): 375–385.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Stevens, S. (1961). To honor Fechner and repeal his law,(3446): 80–133.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Tamburino, D., Alleysson, D., Meylan, L. and Strusstruk, S. (2008). Digital camera workflow for high dynamic range images using a model of retinal process,D. Tamburrino,(Eds.),.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Valeton, J. and van Norren, D. (1983). Light adaptation of primate cones: An analysis based on extracellular data,(12): 1539–1547.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Vertan, C., Oprea, A., Florea, C. and Florea, L. (2008). A pseudo-logarithmic framework for edge detection,, pp. 637–644.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R. and Simoncelli, E.P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity,(4): 600–612.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Ward, G., Rushmeier, H. and Piatko, C. (1997). A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes,(4): 291–306.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Yeganeh, H. and Wang, Z. (2013). Objective quality assessment of tone mapped images,(2): 657–667.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Zhang, W. and Cham, W.-K. (2012). Gradient-directed multi-exposure composition,(4): 2318–2323.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2015-0067 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 943 - 954
Submitted on: Nov 3, 2014
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
logarithmic image processing,
human visual system,
high dynamic range
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Applied mathematics

© 2015 Corneliu Florea, Constantin Vertan, Laura Florea, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 25 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article