Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Optimization of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Determining the Intrinsic Dimensionality of High–Dimensional Data Cover

Optimization of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Determining the Intrinsic Dimensionality of High–Dimensional Data

Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. Álvarez-Meza, A.M., Valencia-Aguirre, J., Daza-Santacoloma, G. and Castellanos-Domínguez, G. (2011). Global and local choice of the number of nearest neighbors in locally linear embedding,(16): 2171–2177.
  2. Belkin, M. and Niyogi, P. (2003). Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation,(6): 1373–1396.
  3. Brand, M. (2003). Charting a manifold,S. Becker, S. Thrun and K. Obermayer (Eds.),, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 961–968.
  4. Camastra, F. (2003). Data dimensionality estimation methods: A survey,(12): 2945–2954.
  5. Carter, K.M., Raich, R. and Hero, A.O. (2010). On local intrinsic dimension estimation and its applications,(2): 650–663.
  6. Chang, Y., Hu, C. and Turk, M. (2004). Probabilistic expression analysis on manifolds,, pp. 520–527.
  7. Costa, J.A. and Hero, A.O. (2004). Geodesic entropic graphs for dimension and entropy estimation in manifold learning,(8): 2210–2221.
  8. Costa, J.A. and Hero, A.O. (2005). Estimating local intrinsic dimension with k-nearest neighbor graphs,(23): 1432–1436.
  9. Donoho, D.L. and Grimes, C. (2005). Hessian eigenmaps: New locally linear embedding techniques for high-dimensional data,(21): 7426–7431.
  10. Dzemyda, G., Kurasova, O. and Žilinskas, J. (2013)., Optimization and Its Applications, Vol. 75, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
  11. Einbeck, J. and Kalantan, Z. (2013). Intrinsic dimensionality estimation for high-dimensional data sets: New approaches for the computation of correlation dimension,(2): 91–97.
  12. Elgammal, A. and su Lee, C. (2004a). Inferring 3d body pose from silhouettes using activity manifold learning,, pp. 681–688.
  13. Elgammal, A. and su Lee, C. (2004b). Separating style and content on a nonlinear manifold,, pp. 478–485.
  14. Fan, M., Zhang, X., Chen, S., Bao, H. and Maybank, S.J. (2013). Dimension estimation of image manifolds by minimal cover approximation,: 19–29.
  15. Fukunaga, K. (1982). Intrinsic dimensionality extraction,P. Krishnaiah and L. Kanal (Eds.),, Vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 347–362.
  16. Fukunaga, K. and Olsen, D. (1971). An algorithm for finding intrinsic dimensionality of data,(2): 176–183.
  17. Gong, S., Cristani, M., Yan, S. and Loy, C.C. (Eds.) (2014)., Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. XVIII, Springer, London.
  18. Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I. (1983). Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors,(1–2): 189–208.
  19. Hadid, A., Kouropteva, O. and Pietikäinen, M. (2002). Unsupervised learning using locally linear embedding: experiments with face pose analysis,, pp. 111–114.
  20. He, J., Ding, L., Jiang, L., Li, Z. and Hu, Q. (2014). Intrinsic dimensionality estimation based on manifold assumption,(5): 740–747.
  21. Hein, M. and Audibert, J. (2005). Intrinsic dimensionality estimation of submanifolds in rd,, pp. 289–296.
  22. Jenkins, O.C. and Mataric, M.J. (2004). A spatio-temporal extension to isomap nonlinear dimension reduction,pp. 441–448.
  23. Karbauskaitė, R. and Dzemyda, G. (2009). Topology preservation measures in the visualization of manifold-type multidimensional data,(2): 235–254.
  24. Karbauskaitė, R. and Dzemyda, G. (2014). Geodesic distances in the intrinsic dimensionality estimation using packing numbers,(4): 578–591.
  25. Karbauskaitė, R., Dzemyda, G. and Marcinkevičius, V. (2008). Selecting a regularization parameter in the locally linear embedding algorithm,, pp. 59–64.
  26. Karbauskaitė, R., Dzemyda, G. and Marcinkevičius, V. (2010). Dependence of locally linear embedding on the regularization parameter,(2): 354–376.
  27. Karbauskaitė, R., Dzemyda, G. and Mazėtis, E. (2011). Geodesic distances in the maximum likelihood estimator of intrinsic dimensionality,(4): 387–402.
  28. Karbauskaitė, R., Kurasova, O. and Dzemyda, G. (2007). Selection of the number of neighbours of each data point for the locally linear embedding algorithm,(4): 359–364.
  29. Kégl, B. (2003). Intrinsic dimension estimation using packing numbers,, pp. 697–704.
  30. Kouropteva, O., Okun, O. and Pietikäinen, M. (2002). Selection of the optimal parameter value for the locally linear embedding algorithm,, pp. 359–363.
  31. Kulczycki, P. and Łukasik, S. (2014). An algorithm for reducing the dimension and size of a sample for data exploration procedures,(1): 133–149, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2014-0011.
  32. Lee, J.A. and Verleysen, M. (2007)., Springer, New York, NY.
  33. Levina, E. and Bickel, P.J. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of intrinsic dimension,L.K. Saul, Y. Weiss and L. Bottou (Eds.),, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 777–784.
  34. Levina, E., Wagaman, A.S., Callender, A.F., Mandair, G.S. and Morris, M.D. (2007). Estimating the number of pure chemical components in a mixture by maximum likelihood,(1–2): 24–34.
  35. Li, S. Z., Xiao, R., Li, Z. and Zhang, H. (2001). Nonlinear mapping from multi-view face patterns to a Gaussian distribution in a low dimensional space,, pp. 47–54.
  36. Mo, D. and Huang, S.H. (2012). Fractal-based intrinsic dimension estimation and its application in dimensionality reduction,(1): 59–71.
  37. Nene, S.A., Nayar, S.K. and Murase, H. (1996). Columbia object image library (COIL-20),, Columbia University, New York, NY.
  38. Niskanen, M. and Silven, O. (2003). Comparison of dimensionality reduction methods for wood surface inspection,, pp. 178–188.
  39. Qiao, M.F.H. and Zhang, B. (2009). Intrinsic dimension estimation of manifolds by incising balls,(5): 780–787.
  40. Roweis, S.T. and Saul, L.K. (2000). Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding,(5500): 2323–2326.
  41. Saul, L.K. and Roweis, S.T. (2003). Think globally, fit locally: Unsupervised learning of low dimensional manifolds,: 119–155.
  42. Shin, Y.J. and Park, C.H. (2011). Analysis of correlation based dimension reduction methods,(3): 549–558, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-011-0043-9.
  43. Tenenbaum, J.B., de Silva, V. and Langford, J.C. (2000). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction,(5500): 2319–2323.
  44. van der Maaten, L.J.P. (2007). An introduction to dimensionality reduction using MATLAB,, Maastricht University, Maastricht.
  45. Varini, C., Nattkemper, T. W., Degenhard, A. and Wismuller, A. (2004). Breast MRI data analysis by LLE,, Vol. 3, pp. 2449–2454.
  46. Verveer, P. and Duin, R. (1995). An evaluation of intrinsic dimensionality estimators,(1): 81–86.
  47. Weinberger, K.Q. and Saul, L.K. (2006). Unsupervised learning of image manifolds by semidefinite programming,(1): 77–90.
  48. Yang, M.-H. (2002). Face recognition using extended isomap,, pp. 117–120.
  49. Yata, K. and Aoshima, M. (2010). Intrinsic dimensionality estimation of high-dimension, low sample size data with d-asymptotics,(8–9): 1511–1521.
  50. Zhang, J., Li, S.Z. and Wang, J. (2004). Nearest manifold approach for face recognition,, pp. 223–228.
  51. Zhang, Z. and Zha, H. (2004). Principal manifolds and nonlinear dimensionality reduction via local tangent space alignment,(1): 313–338.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2015-0064 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 895 - 913
Submitted on: Sep 11, 2014
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Rasa Karbauskaitė, Gintautas Dzemyda, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.