Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Maintaining the Feasibility of Hard Real–Time Systems with a Reduced Number of Priority Levels Cover

Maintaining the Feasibility of Hard Real–Time Systems with a Reduced Number of Priority Levels

Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. Audsley, N.C., Burns, A., Tindell, K. and A. Wellings (1993). Applying new scheduling theory to static priority preemptive scheduling,(5): 284–292.
  2. Audsley, N.C. (2001). On priority assignment in fixed priority scheduling,(1): 39–44.
  3. Bini, E., Buttazzo, G.C. and Buttazzo, G. (2001). A hyperbolic bound for the rate monotonic algorithm,, pp.59–66.
  4. Bini, E. and Buttazzo, G.C. (2004). Schedulability analysis of periodic fixed priority systems,(11): 1462–1473.
  5. Bini, E., Natale, M.D. and Buttazzo, G. (2008). Sensitivity analysis for fixed-priority real-time systems,(1–3): 5–30.
  6. Burns, A. and Wellings, A.J. (2009)., 4th Edn., Addison Wesley, Longmain.
  7. Davis, R.I., Zabos, A. and Burns, A. (2008). Efficient exact schedulability tests for fixed priority real-time systems,(9): 1261–1276.
  8. Han, C.C. and Tyan, H.Y. (1997). A better polynomial-time schedulability test for real-time fixed-priority scheduling algorithms,, p. 36.
  9. Hong, K.S. and Leung, J.Y.-T. (1992). On-line scheduling of real-time tasks,(10):1326–1331.
  10. Joseph, M. and Pandya, P.K. (1986). Finding response times in a real-time system,(5): 390–395.
  11. Katcher, D.I., Arakawa, H. and Strosnider, J.K. (1993). Engineering and analysis of fixed priority schedulers,(9): 920–934.
  12. Katcher, D.I., Sathaye, S.S. and Strosnider, J.K. (1995). Fixed priority scheduling with limited priority levels,(9): 1140–1144.
  13. Kopetz, H. (1997).Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
  14. Laplante, P.A., Kartalopoulos, S.V., Akay, M., El-Hawary, M.E., Periera, F. M.B., Anderson, J. B., Leonardi, R., Singh, C., Baker, R.J., Montrose, M., Tewksbury, S., Brewer, J.E., Newman, M.S. and Zobrist, G. (2004)., John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
  15. Lee, W. Y., Hong, S. J. and Kim, J. (2003). On-line scheduling of scalable real-time tasks on multiprocessor systems,(12): 1315–1324.
  16. Lehoczky, J.P. and Sha, L. (1986). Performance of real-time bus scheduling algorithms,, pp. 44–53.
  17. Lehoczky, J.P., Sha, L. and Ding, Y. (1989). The rate monotonic scheduling algorithm: Exact characterization and average case behavior,, pp. 166–171.
  18. Leung, J.Y.T. and Whitehead, J. (1982). On the complexity of fixed-priority scheduling of periodic,(4): 237–250.
  19. Liu, C.L. and Layland, J.W. (1973). Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in a hard real-time environment,(1): 40–61.
  20. Liu, J.W.S. (2000)., Prentice Hall, New York, NY.
  21. Min-Allah, N., Yong-Ji, W., Jian-Sheng, X. and Jiu-Xiang, L. (2007). Revisiting fixed priority techniques,T.W. Kuo(Eds.),, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4808, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 134–145.
  22. Min-Allah, N., Khan, S.U. and Yongji, W. (2010). Optimal task execution times for periodic tasks using nonlinear constrained optimization,(3): 1–19.
  23. Min-Allah, N. and Khan, S.U. (2011). A hybrid test for faster feasibility analysis of periodic tasks,(10): 5689–5698.
  24. Orozco, J., Cayssials, R., Santos, J. and Santos, R. (1998). On the minimum number of priority levels required for the rate monotonic scheduling of real-time systems,.
  25. Patan, M. (2012). Distributed scheduling of sensor networks for identification of spatio-temporal processes,(2): 299–311, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-012-0022-9.
  26. Santos, J., Gastaminza, M. L., Orozco, J., Picardi, D. and Alimenti, O. (1991). Priorities and protocols in real-time LANs,(9): 507–514.
  27. Sha, L. and Goodenough, J.B. (1988). Real-time scheduling theory and ADA,, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Piittsburgh, PA.
  28. Sha, L., Sprunt, B. and Lehoczky, J.P. (1989). Aperiodic task scheduling for hard real-time systems,(1): 27–69.
  29. Sheng, J., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Zeng, H. and Min-Allah, N. (2007). A static priority assignment algorithm with least number of priority levels,(7): 1844–1854.
  30. Sjodin, M. and Hansson, H. (1998). Improved response-time analysis calculations,, pp. 399–409.
  31. Tindell, K.W., Bums, A. and Wellings, A.J. (1994). An extendible approach for analyzing fixed priority hard real-time tasks,(2):133–151.
  32. Xuelian, B., Yuhai, Y. and Shiyao, J. (2003). Optimal fixed priority assignment with limited priority levels,, pp. 194–203.
  33. Xu, J. and Parnas, D. (1990). Scheduling processes with release times, deadlines, precedence, and exclusion relations,(3): 360–369.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2015-0051 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 709 - 722
Submitted on: Oct 11, 2014
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Muhammad Bilal Qureshi, Saleh Alrashed, Nasro Min-Allah, Joanna Kołodziej, Piotr Arabas, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.