Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A belief revision approach for argumentation-based negotiation agents Cover
Open Access
|Sep 2015

References

  1. Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P. and Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2): 510-530.10.2307/2274239
  2. Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y. and Moraitis, P. (2007). A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation, 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2007), Honolulu, HI, USA, p. 158.
  3. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S. and Maudet, N. (2000). Arguments, dialogue and negotiation, inW. Horn (Ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), IOS Press, Berlin, pp. 338-342.
  4. Amgoud, L. and Vesic, S. (2011). A formal analysis of the outcomes of argumentation-based negotiations, 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1237-1238.
  5. Bonanno, G., Delgrande, J., Lang, J. and Rott, H. (2009). Special issue on formal models of belief change in rational agents, Journal of Applied Logic 7(4): 363.10.1016/j.jal.2009.05.001
  6. Dix, J., Hansson, S.O., Kern-Isberner, G. and Simari, G.R. (2013). Belief change and argumentation in multi-agent scenarios (Dagstuhl seminar 13231), Dagstuhl Reports 3(6): 1-21.
  7. Dung, P.M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77(2): 321-357.10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
  8. Falappa, M., Garcia, A., Kern-Isberner, G. and Simari, G. (2011). On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation, Knowledge Engineering Review 26(1): 35-43.10.1017/S0269888910000391
  9. Fermé, E., Saez, K. and Sanz, P. (2003). Multiple kernel contraction, Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic 73(2): 183-195.10.1023/A:1022927828817
  10. Hansson, S. (1994). Kernel contraction, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 59(3): 845-859.10.2307/2275912
  11. Hansson, S. (1999). A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating, Applied Logic Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-007-0814-3
  12. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C. and Wooldridge, M. (2001). Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges, International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2): 199-215.10.1023/A:1008746126376
  13. Kraus, S., Sycara, K. and Evenchik, A. (1998). Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation, Artificial Intelligence 104(1-2): 1-69.10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00078-2
  14. Parsons, S., Sierra, C. and Jennings, N.R. (1998). Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing, Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3): 261-292.10.1093/logcom/8.3.261
  15. Pasquier, P., Hollands, R., Rahwan, I., Dignum, F. and Sonenberg, L. (2011). An empirical study of interest-based negotiation, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 22(2): 249-288.10.1007/s10458-010-9125-6
  16. Pilotti, P., Casali, A. and Chesñevar, C. (2014). Incorporating object features in collaborative argumentation-based negotiation agents, Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)/Encontro Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC), Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil, pp. 31-37.
  17. Rahwan, I., Pasquier, P., Sonenberg, L. and Dignum, F. (2007). On the benefits of exploiting underlying goals in argument-based negotiation, 22nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Vancouver, Canada, pp. 116-121.
  18. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., Mcburney, P., Parsons, S. and Sonenberg, L. (2003).
  19. Argumentation-based negotiation, Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4): 343-375.10.1017/S0269888904000098
  20. Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R. and Sierra, C. (2003).
  21. Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach, Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 9-17.
  22. Rosenschein, J.S. and Zlotkin, G. (1994). Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  23. Sadri, F., Toni, F. and Torroni, P. (2001). Logic agents, dialogues and negotiation: An abductive approach, Proceedings of the AISB’01 Convention, York, UK, pp. 5-12.
  24. Sakama, C. (2011). Dishonest reasoning by abduction, 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1063-1064.
  25. Sierra, C. and Debenham, J.K. (2007). The logic negotiation model, 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2007), Honolulu, HI, USA, p. 243.
  26. Zhang, D. (2010). A logic-based axiomatic model of bargaining, Artificial Intelligence 174(16-17): 1307-1322.10.1016/j.artint.2010.08.003
  27. Zhang, D., Foo, N., Meyer, T. and Kwok, R. (2004). Negotiation as mutual belief revision, Proceedings of AAAI04, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 317-322.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2015-0034 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 455 - 470
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2014
Published on: Sep 30, 2015
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Pablo Pilotti, Ana Casali, Carlos Chesñevar, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.