Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A situation-based multi-agent architecture for handling misunderstandings in interactions Cover

A situation-based multi-agent architecture for handling misunderstandings in interactions

Open Access
|Sep 2015

References

  1. Barber, H. and Kudenko, D. (2008). Generation of dilemma-based interactive narratives with a changeable story goal, International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment, Cancun, Mexico, pp. 6:1-6:10.
  2. Behrmann, G., David, A. and Larsen, K. (2004). A tutorial on Uppaal, in M. Bernardo and F. Corradini (Eds.), Formal Methods for the Design of Real-Time Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3185, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 200-236.10.1007/978-3-540-30080-9_7
  3. Champagnat, R., Delmas, G. and Augeraud, M. (2010). A storytelling model for educational games: Heros interactive journey, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 2(1): 4-20.10.1504/IJTEL.2010.031257
  4. Combefis, S., and Pecheur, C. (2009). A bisimulation-based approach to the analysis of human-computer interaction, ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS’09), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 101-110.
  5. Dang, K.D., Pham, P.T., Champagnat, R. and Rabah, M. (2013). Linear logic validation and hierarchical modeling for interactive storytelling control, in D. Reidsma, H. Katayose and A. Nijholt (Eds.), Advances in Computer Entertainment, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8253, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 524-527.10.1007/978-3-319-03161-3_44
  6. Dey, A.K. (2001). Understanding and using context, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5(1): 4-7.10.1007/s007790170019
  7. Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(1): 19-30.10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8
  8. Ho, H.N., Rabah, M., Nowakowski, S. and Estrailler, P. (2014). Trace-based weighting approach for multiple criteria decision making, Journal of Software 9(8): 2180-2187.10.4304/jsw.9.8.2180-2187
  9. Hommel, B., P¨osse, B. andWaszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action, Psychologica Belgica 40(4): 227-245.10.5334/pb.964
  10. Jiang, H. (2005). Confidence measures for speech recognition: A survey, Speech Communication 45(5): 455-470.10.1016/j.specom.2004.12.004
  11. Karlsson, B., Ciarlini, A.E.M., Feijo, B. and Furtado, A.L. (2006). Applying a plan-recognition/plan-generation paradigm to interactive storytelling, Workshop on AI Planning for Computer Games and Synthetic Characters (ICAPS 2006), Cumbria, UK, pp. 31-40.
  12. Karsenty, L. and Botherel, V. (2005). Transparency strategies to help users handle system errors, Speech Communication 45(3): 305-324.10.1016/j.specom.2004.10.018
  13. King, G.G. (2011). General aviation training for automation surprise, Journal of Professional Aviation Training & Testing Research 5(1): 46-51.
  14. Laprie, J. C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C. and Member, S. (2004). Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 1(1): 11-33.10.1109/TDSC.2004.2
  15. Lebowitz, J. and Klug, C. (2011). Interactive Storytelling for Video Games: A Player-Centered Approach for Creating Memorable Character and Stories, Focal Press, Waltham, MA.
  16. Lopez-Cozar, R., Callejas, Z. and Griol, D. (2010). Using knowledge about misunderstandings to increase the robustness of spoken dialogue systems, Knowledge-Based Systems 23(5): 471-485.10.1016/j.knosys.2010.03.004
  17. Magerko, B. and Laird, J.E. (2004). Mediating the tension between plot and interaction, AAAI Workshop Series: Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 108-112.
  18. Paul, R., Charles, D., McNeill, M. and McSherry, D. (2011). Adaptive storytelling and story repair in a dynamic environment, in M. Si et al. (Eds.), International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (ICIDS), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7069, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 128-139.10.1007/978-3-642-25289-1_14
  19. Pham, P.T., Rabah, M. and Estraillier, P. (2011). Handling the misunderstanding in interactions: Definition and solution, International Conference on Software Engineering & Applications (SEA 2011), Singapore, pp. 47-52.
  20. Pham, P.T., Rabah, M. and Estraillier, P. (2013). Agent-based architecture and situation-based scenario for consistency management, Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS 2013), Kraków, Poland, pp. 1065-1070.
  21. Picard, F. and Estraillier, P. (2010). Context-dependent player’s movement interpretation application to adaptive game development, Three-Dimensional Image Processing (3DIP) and Applications, San Jose, CA, USA.10.1117/12.838757
  22. Prigent, A., Champagnat, R. and Estraillier, P. (2005). Scenario building based on formal methods and adaptative execution, International Simulation and Gaming Association Conference (ISAGA2005), Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1-19.
  23. Rapaport, W.J. (2003). What did you mean by that? Misunderstanding, negotiation, and syntactic semantics, Journal Minds and Machines 13(3): 397-427.10.1023/A:1024145126190
  24. Sehaba, K., Estraillier, P. and Lambert, D. (2005). Interactive educational games for autistic children with agent-based system, International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC’05), Sanda, Japan, pp. 422-432.
  25. Silva, A., Raimundo, G. and Paiva, A. (2003). Tell me that bit again... Bringing interactivity to a virtual storyteller, in O. Balet, G. Subsol and P. Torguet (Eds.), Virtual Storytelling. Using Virtual Reality Technologies for Storytelling, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 1-10.
  26. Tanenbaum, A.S. and Woodhull, A.S. (2006). Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  27. Trillaud, F., Pham, P.T., Rabah, M., Estraillier, P. and Malki, J. (2012). Situation-based scenarios for e-learning, International Conference on e-Learning (EL 2012), Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 121-128.
  28. Young, R.M., Riedl, M.O., Branly, M. and Jhala, A. (2004). An architecture for integrating plan-based behavior generation with interactive game environments, Journal of Game Development 1(1): 51-70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2015-0033 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8492 | Journal ISSN: 1641-876X
Language: English
Page range: 439 - 454
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2014
Published on: Sep 30, 2015
Published by: University of Zielona Góra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Thao Phuong Pham, Mourad Rabah, Pascal Estraillier, published by University of Zielona Góra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.