Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Donation of Gametes and the Anonimity of the Donors Cover

The Donation of Gametes and the Anonimity of the Donors

Acta Medica Bulgarica
Volume 42 (2015): Issue 1 (May 2015)
By:  and    
Open Access
|May 2015
References

References

  1. 1. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law III Gamete and embryo donation - Human Reproduction, 2002; 17(5): 1407-1408.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. McWhinnie A. Gamete donation and anonymity, Hum Reprod, 2001; 16(5): 807-817.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Hill M (2002) Sperm donors “want to keep anonymity”. BBC News. Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2329675.stm
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Brett S, Sacranie RR, Thomas GE, and Rajkhowa R. Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2008; 11: 101-107.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Janssens P. M. W, Simons A. H. M, van Kooij R. J, Blokzijl E, and Dunselman G. A. J. A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact. Hum. Reprod, 2006; 21(4): 852-856.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, and Golombok S. School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents’ disclosure patterns. Hum. Reprod., 2005; 20(3): 810-819.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Krastev R, Mitev V. Law and bioethics of the assisted reproduction in the European Union, Sofia, ed. Iztok-Zapad, 2014, p.29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Daniels K, and Lalos O. The Swedish Insemination Act and the availability of donors. Hum. Reprod, 1995; 12: 1871-1874.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Fichou K. (AFP) (Oct 8, 2011) Sperm donors father huge “families” in US, Canada Available at www.google.com/.../afp/.../ALeqM5jT8W3P_gpVoAZi1l6ShG5zH1...
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Pennings, G., The “double track” policy for donor anonymity. Hum. Reprod., 1997; 12; 2839-2844.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Frith, L, Blyth, E., Farrand, A., UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitement. Hum. Reprod, 2007; 22(6): 1675-1680.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Skoog Svanberg, A., Lampic, C., Bergh, T., Lundkvist, Ö. Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden. Human Reproduction 2003a; 18(5): 1107-1114.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Skoog Svanberg, A., Lampic, C., Bergh, T., Lundkvist, Ö. Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden. Human Reproduction 2003b; 18(10):2210-2215.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Isaksson, S., Skoog Svanberg, A., Sydsjö, G., Thurin-Kjellberg, A., Karlström, P. O., Solensten, N.-G., Lampic, C. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation? Human Reproduction 2011; 26(.4): 853-860.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Minai, J., Suzuki, K., Takeda, Y., Hoshi, K., Yamagata, Z. There are gender differences in attitudes towards surrogacy when information on this technique is provided. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2007; 132: 193-199.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. http://www.ipsos.com/interviews
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. http://www.doctissimo.fr/html/dossiers/genetique/14922-enquete-la-bioethique-et-vous
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. De la Fuente Fonnest I., Finn Søndergaard, Gert Fonnest and Agnette Vedsted-Jacobsen, Attitudes among health care professionals on the ethics of assisted reproductive technologies and legal abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2000; 79: 49-53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Papaharitou S, Nakopoulou E., Moraitou M., Hatzimouratidis K. and Hatzichristou D. Reproductive health and midwives: Does occupational status differentiate their attitudes on assisted reproduction technologies from those of the general population? Human Reproduction 2007; 22(7): 2033-2039.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. YouGov Assisted Reproduction Survey On behalf of Progress Educational Trust Summ ary report, www.YouGov.com novembre 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Brewaeys, A., De Bruyn, J. K., Louwe, L. A., Helmerhorst, F. M. Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients’ choices. Hum. Reprod, 2005; 20(3): 820-824.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amb-2015-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 (formerly 0324-1750) | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 11
Published on: May 22, 2015
Published by: Medical University - Sofia
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
anonymity,
gamete donation,
assisted reproduction
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other

© 2015 R. Krastev, V. Mitev, published by Medical University - Sofia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 42 (2015): Issue 1 (May 2015)
Next article