Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Study on Fracture Resistance of Class IV Cavities Treated with Pins Cover

A Study on Fracture Resistance of Class IV Cavities Treated with Pins

Open Access
|Feb 2015

References

  1. 1 . Butchard , D., A. Grieve et J. Kamel. Retention of composite restorations: A comparison between a threated pin and a dentine binding agent. - British Dental J., 165, 1988, № 6, 217-219. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806563
  2. 2 . Burgess, J. O., A. Alvares et J. B. Summit. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations. - Operative Dentistry, 22, 1997, № 3, 128-132.
  3. 3 . Federick , D. A marriage of convenience: bonds of retention pins and composites. - J. Prosthetic Dentistry, 57, 1987, № 3, 270-276. 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90295-2
  4. 4 . Felton , D. et al. Pulpal response to treated pin and retentive slot techniques: A pilot investigation. - J. Prosthetic Dentistry, 66, 1991, № 5, 597-602. 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90436-Z
  5. 5 . Imbery, T. A., J. O. Burgess et R. C. Batzer. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations. - J. Am. Dental Association,126, 1995, № 6, 753-759. 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.02707797731
  6. 6 . Muhlbauer, J. et al. Composite pins in class IV restorations. - Operative Dentistry, 27, 2002, № 3, 285-288.
  7. 7 . Neme , A., D. Evans et B. Maxson. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. - Operative Dentistry, 25, 2000, 512-519.
  8. 8 . Pickard, H. M. A manual of operative dentistry. Oxford University Press, 1983, p. 129, 149, 153, 204, 206, 232.
  9. 9 . Redtenbacher, K. Use of retentive pins in composite restorations class IV. - Quintessence International, 1975, 6, 7, 31-32.
  10. 10 . Roberts, H., C. Hermesch et D. Charlton. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of class IV restorations. - Operative dentistry, 25, 2000, 4, 2, 270-273.
  11. 11 . Sen, D., E. Nayir et F. Cetiner. Shear bond strength of amalgam reinforced with a bonding agent and/or dentin pins. - J. Prosthetic Dentistry, 87, 2002, № 4, 446-450. 10.1067/mpr.2002.122865
  12. 12 . Standlee, J., E. Collard et A. Caputo. Dentinal defects caused by some twist drills and retentive pins. - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 24, 1970, № 2, 185-192.10.1016/0022-3913(70)90143-5
  13. 13. Summitt, J. B.et all. The performance of bonded versus pin retained complex amalgam restorations: a five year clinical evaluation. - Journal of American Dental Association, 132, 2001, № 7, 923-931. 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.030511480646
  14. 14 . Summitt, J. B.et al. Six year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations. - Operative Dentistry, 29, 2004, № 3, 261-268.
  15. 15 . Terence, A., et al. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents. - J. Am. Dental Association, 126, 1995, 753. 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0270
  16. 16 . Vaught, R. L. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations. What is the evidence? - J. Dental Education, 71, 2007, № 10, 1356-1362. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.10.tb04400.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/amb-2014-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5384 | Journal ISSN: 0324-1750
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 48
Published on: Feb 6, 2015
Published by: Sofia Medical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 E. Boteva, K. Peycheva, D. Karayasheva, D. Pashkouleva, M. Marinova, published by Sofia Medical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.