Dynamics of the Non-Contact Roundness Measurement with Air Gages

Jermak, Czesław Janusz; Rucki, Mirosław

doi:10.1515/ama-2016-0035

Abstract

The paper presents the results of investigations on the air gages dynamic characteristics in the measurement of the round profiles of motor cylinders. The principle of the measuring device is explained, and the analysis of the air gages dynamics is described. The results of dynamic calibration enabled to eliminate those configurations of air gages that may not meet the requirements of the measurement they were designed for. After the proper air gages were chosen, the entire system underwent the accuracy test and passed it successfully revealing the method accuracy better than 10% compared to the reference measurement.

References

1. Adamczak S., Janecki D., Stępień K. (2010), Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the accuracy of the V-block method of cylindricity measurements, Precision Engineering, 34, 619–626.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2010.03.004
Search in Google Scholar
2. Cellary A., Jermak Cz. J. (2009), Pneumatic Method for Reference Out-Of-Roundness Measurement, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Metrology in Production Engineering, Poznan – Zerkow, 59–64.
Search in Google Scholar
3. Derezynski J., Jakubowicz M. (2016), Verification tests of the air gauges metrological characteristics, Mechanik, 3, 196–199.10.17814/mechanik.2016.3.20
Search in Google Scholar
4. Dmitriev V.N., Chernyshev V.I. (1958), Calculation of the time domain characteristics of the pneumatic flow-through chambers, Avtomatika i telemehanika, 12, 1118–1125 (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
5. Figliola R.S., Beasley D.E. (2006), Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements, 4^th ed., John Wiley& Sons Inc., Clemson.
Search in Google Scholar
6. Gao R.D., Tang X., Gordon G., Kazmer D.O. (2014), Online product qualty monitoring through in-process measurement, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 63(1), 493–496.10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.041
Search in Google Scholar
7. Grandy D., Koshy P., Klocke F. (2009), Pneumatic non-contact roughness assessment of moving surfaces, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 58(1), 515–518.10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.121
Search in Google Scholar
8. Jermak Cz. J., Rucki M. (2012), Air Gauging: Static and Dynamic Characteristics, IFSA, Barcelona.
Search in Google Scholar
9. Jermak Cz.J., Cellary A., Rucki M. (2010), Novel method of non-contact out-of-roundness measurement with air gauges, Proceedings of the euspen 10^th International Conference, Delft, 71–74.
Search in Google Scholar
10. Jun Liu et al. (2012), Design and accuracy analysis of pneumatic gauging for form error of spool valve inner hole, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 23, 26–32.10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2011.12.007
Search in Google Scholar
11. Menzies I., Koshy P. (2009), In-process detection of surface porosity in machined castings, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 49(6), 530–535.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.12.008
Search in Google Scholar
12. Milo M.W., Roan M., Harris B. (2015), A new statistical approach to automated quality control in manufacturing processes, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 159–167.10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.06.001
Search in Google Scholar
13. O’Neill P., Sohal A., Teng Ch.W. (2016), Quality management approaches and their impact on firms’ financial performance – An Australian study, International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 381–393.10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.015
Search in Google Scholar
14. Pollard J.H. (1977), A Handbook of Numerical and Statistical Techniques, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Search in Google Scholar
15. Rucki M. (2011), Dynamic properties of the back-pressure air gauges with small measuring chambers, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan (in Polish).
Search in Google Scholar
16. Rucki M., Barisic B. (2009), Response Time of Air Gauges With Different Volumes of the Measuring Chambers, Metrology and Measurement Systems, 16(2), 289–298.
Search in Google Scholar
17. Rucki M., Jermak Cz. J. (2012), Dynamic Properties of Small Chamber Air Gages, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 134(1), p. 011001 (6 pages).10.1115/1.4005043
Search in Google Scholar
18. Shiraishi M., Yamagiwa T., Ito A. (2002), Practical dimensional error control and surface roughness inspection in turning, Proceedings of ASME-2002 Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, 45–51.10.1115/IMECE2002-32036
Search in Google Scholar
19. Stępień K. (2010), In situ measurement of cylindricity – Problems and solutions, Precision Engineering, 38, 697–701.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.02.007
Search in Google Scholar
20. Tsidulko F.V. (1965), Dynamics of the pneumatic devices for the dimensional measurement, Mashinostroyeniye, Moskva (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
21. Vacharanukul K., Mekid S. (2005), In-Process Dimensional Inspection Sensors, Measurement, 38, 204–218.10.1016/j.measurement.2005.07.009
Search in Google Scholar
22. Valicek J. et al. (2007), An investigation of surfaces generated by abrasive waterjets using optical detection, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 53(4), 224–232.
Search in Google Scholar
23. Wang Y. H. et al. (2005), An Automatic Sorting System Based on Pneumatic Measurement, Key Engineering Materials, 295-296, 563–568.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.295-296.563
Search in Google Scholar
24. Wieczorkowski S. (1995), Automatic regulation of the rotational speed of the pneumatic misroturbines, Research Publication Series of Lodz University of Technology, No. 703, Lodz (in Polish).
Search in Google Scholar
25. Yribarren R. (1955), The pneumatic method applied to dynamic measurement, Proceedings of the Symposium on Engineering dimensional metrology, London, 225–240.
Search in Google Scholar

Dynamics of the Non-Contact Roundness Measurement with Air Gages

Abstract

Paradigm

My account